05.06.2013 Views

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Study Control Number: PN00075/1482<br />

Probabilistic Assessment of Power System Security<br />

Chi-Hung Kelvin Chu<br />

Domestic utility systems are vulnerable to disruption from many types of threat including natural events and malicious<br />

action. Tools are needed to protect our nation’s electric power generation and delivery systems. This project is<br />

developing new approaches to reduce the vulnerability of the electric power infrastructure to internal and external threats.<br />

Project Description<br />

The goal of this research was to integrate both power<br />

system adequacy and security evaluation into a single<br />

framework. The scope of work focused on the security<br />

aspect of the power system. Specific objectives included:<br />

1) validate existing techniques for the fast detection of<br />

power system instability; 2) develop a reusable computer<br />

code to implement the selected technique, this segment of<br />

the project is used to screen, rank, and select system<br />

contingencies before conducting probabilistic system<br />

security assessment; and 3) develop a prototype digital<br />

computer program to implement and conduct probabilistic<br />

power system security evaluation.<br />

This project will quantify the system stability<br />

performance by providing information such as the<br />

probability of instability, and other useful and available<br />

indices. Once the approach is successfully developed and<br />

implemented, the overall goal of integrating both power<br />

system adequacy and security evaluation under one single<br />

framework can then be achieved.<br />

Introduction<br />

Power system security evaluation involves the<br />

determination of the stability of a power system under<br />

different contingencies. The common system planning<br />

approach is the use of a deterministic criterion such as<br />

“N-1” criterion. The system is designed to withstand and<br />

continue to function within established guidelines for any<br />

single contingency such as the outage of a line or the loss<br />

of a generator. The use of the N-1 criterion reduces the<br />

amount of time necessary to evaluate and simulate the<br />

performance of the system. This criterion was adequate<br />

for the North American interconnected transmission<br />

system because of the significant amount of transmission<br />

reserve in the system. As the economy grows, energy<br />

consumption also increases. In addition, as the electric<br />

industry moves into a deregulating and competitive<br />

environment, more energy is transmitted across the<br />

national grid and at longer distances. The power system<br />

has become more susceptible to instability as the load<br />

grows and the transmission reserve diminishes.<br />

The stability of a power system depends on a large<br />

number of factors and conditions at the time of the<br />

contingency. Factors such as the load level at the time of<br />

the contingency, location and the type of the contingency,<br />

the conditions of the network, and the components that<br />

are required to clear the problem at the time of<br />

contingency can all affect the stability of the system. The<br />

factors are stochastic in nature. The deterministic N-1<br />

criterion does not take into account the probabilistic<br />

nature of these factors. These, together with the addition<br />

of new players into the energy market and the<br />

unpredictable energy transactions across the nation, all<br />

contribute more uncertainties to the planning and<br />

operation of the modern power system. The ability to<br />

incorporate these uncertainties into the planning and<br />

operating processess and the ability to quantify the<br />

various risks and their consequences are therefore greatly<br />

needed.<br />

Approach<br />

The proposed project is divided into three stages:<br />

1. Validation of existing techniques. The traditional<br />

approach to determine system stability has been the<br />

use of step-by-step simulation using the system swing<br />

equation. Faster stability detection is often done<br />

using various energy functions. The traditional<br />

approach is computationally expensive and slow, and<br />

the use of energy functions requires the development<br />

of appropriate energy functions. Currently, the “Fast<br />

Second Kick” technique seems to be the most<br />

promising. The first phase is to select and validate<br />

the latest techniques for the determination and<br />

detection of power system stability. The selected<br />

technique will be used in the second phase.<br />

2. Implementation of the selected techniques. The<br />

selected technique will be implemented in the second<br />

Energy Technology and Management 269

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!