PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Study Control Number: PN00090/1497<br />
Use of Reduced Metal Ions in Reductive Reagents<br />
John S. Fruchter, Jim E. Szecsody<br />
In the past 15 years, groundwater cleanup of chlorinated solvents has involved installation of reactive subsurface iron<br />
barriers in over 25 sites in the U.S. One method used, which relies upon the reduction of iron in natural sediments, is<br />
applicable to deep aquifers (more than 100 feet). In this laboratory study, we modified geochemically the sediment<br />
reduction method to make the process more efficient and, ideally, less expensive.<br />
Project Description<br />
The purpose of this study was to determine a more<br />
efficient method for introducing chemical reducing<br />
capacity into the subsurface. After an initial reduction of<br />
aquifer sediments with sodium dithionite, reduced cations,<br />
such as ferrous iron (Fe(II)) or titanous ion (Ti(III)) would<br />
be injected into the aquifer. The expected results are an<br />
understanding of the proportions of Fe(II) and Ti(III)<br />
metal ions to use and the chemical conditions needed for<br />
achieving a successful reduced zone. In this way, a<br />
reactive barrier can be developed that is more effective<br />
for destroying dissolved contaminants such as chlorinated<br />
solvents and explosives.<br />
Over the past several years, a major effort at <strong>Pacific</strong><br />
<strong>Northwest</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong> was the development of<br />
reductive barrier remediation techniques for use on<br />
shallow and deep (>50 feet below ground surface)<br />
contaminant plumes. The most promising method is in<br />
situ redox manipulation. The basis of the method is the<br />
use of a strong reducing agent (dithionite) to reduce<br />
normally trivalent structural iron in the soil matrix to the<br />
more reactive divalent form. The presence of the<br />
immobile divalent iron in the treated zone creates a<br />
chemically active barrier to the transport of reducible<br />
species, which can last for decades before renewal.<br />
Despite these successes, dithionite addition alone is an<br />
inefficient and expensive way to add reducing capacity to<br />
the aquifer. Because the reduction of some contaminants<br />
(trichloroethylene for example), the surface has a catalytic<br />
or surface coordination role in reduction, the presence of<br />
specific metals on the iron oxide surface can increase the<br />
electron transfer (reduction) rate. This concept has been<br />
applied to zero-valent iron walls, with the incorporation<br />
of trace amounts of Cr and Ni. A more efficient method<br />
would be to inject dithionite to produce reducing<br />
conditions in the aquifer, then add one or more reduced<br />
metal ions directly. We propose to amend the in situ<br />
redox manipulation technique through addition of<br />
additional reduced metal ions (e.g., Fe(ii), Ti(III)) to the<br />
redox injection. Cationic adsorption of reduced metal<br />
ions on the soil matrix should the produce a more reactive<br />
barrier.<br />
Introduction<br />
In this study, we investigated electron donors or reaction<br />
catalysts potential chemical additions.<br />
Fe(II) and Mn(II) additions (electron donors) resulted in a<br />
significant increase in trichloroethylene dechlorination.<br />
Trichloroethylene dechlorination with the Fe(II) addition<br />
was predictable and more efficient than the Mn(II). The<br />
additions of Ti(III), Ni(II), Pd catalyst, and EDTA did not<br />
enhance the trichloroethylene dechlorination rate in<br />
sediments, even though these compounds are used in<br />
engineered systems. Because the addition of an electron<br />
shuttle had only a slight positive effect, the rate of<br />
trichloroethylene degradation is not limited by electron<br />
transfer, so an additional electron donor rather than<br />
catalyst is likely more efficient. While an Fe(II) addition<br />
is expected to be more cost efficient than the use of<br />
reduced sediment alone, amending the redox treatment at<br />
the field scale involves additional hydraulic and<br />
geochemical considerations. Upscaling these results of<br />
using small to large experimental systems is needed to<br />
design viable field-scale injection schemes.<br />
Trichloroethylene dechlorination with reduced sediment<br />
relies on the oxidation of ferrous iron [adsorbed Fe(II),<br />
Fe(II)CO3, reduced smectite clays; Szecsody et al. 2000a,<br />
b]. In addition, adsorbed or structural Fe II on an Fe III -<br />
oxide or clay surface is necessary for dechlorination,<br />
either as a catalyst, a semiconductor, or to provide surface<br />
Eh conditions (Scherer et al. 1999; Wehrli 1992). The<br />
trichloroethylene degradation pathway using zero-valent<br />
iron (Roberts et al. 1996) and reduced sediments<br />
(Szecsody et al. 2000b) is reductive elimination producing<br />
chloroacetylene, then acetylene:<br />
Earth System Science 251