05.06.2013 Views

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Study Control Number: PN00090/1497<br />

Use of Reduced Metal Ions in Reductive Reagents<br />

John S. Fruchter, Jim E. Szecsody<br />

In the past 15 years, groundwater cleanup of chlorinated solvents has involved installation of reactive subsurface iron<br />

barriers in over 25 sites in the U.S. One method used, which relies upon the reduction of iron in natural sediments, is<br />

applicable to deep aquifers (more than 100 feet). In this laboratory study, we modified geochemically the sediment<br />

reduction method to make the process more efficient and, ideally, less expensive.<br />

Project Description<br />

The purpose of this study was to determine a more<br />

efficient method for introducing chemical reducing<br />

capacity into the subsurface. After an initial reduction of<br />

aquifer sediments with sodium dithionite, reduced cations,<br />

such as ferrous iron (Fe(II)) or titanous ion (Ti(III)) would<br />

be injected into the aquifer. The expected results are an<br />

understanding of the proportions of Fe(II) and Ti(III)<br />

metal ions to use and the chemical conditions needed for<br />

achieving a successful reduced zone. In this way, a<br />

reactive barrier can be developed that is more effective<br />

for destroying dissolved contaminants such as chlorinated<br />

solvents and explosives.<br />

Over the past several years, a major effort at <strong>Pacific</strong><br />

<strong>Northwest</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong> was the development of<br />

reductive barrier remediation techniques for use on<br />

shallow and deep (>50 feet below ground surface)<br />

contaminant plumes. The most promising method is in<br />

situ redox manipulation. The basis of the method is the<br />

use of a strong reducing agent (dithionite) to reduce<br />

normally trivalent structural iron in the soil matrix to the<br />

more reactive divalent form. The presence of the<br />

immobile divalent iron in the treated zone creates a<br />

chemically active barrier to the transport of reducible<br />

species, which can last for decades before renewal.<br />

Despite these successes, dithionite addition alone is an<br />

inefficient and expensive way to add reducing capacity to<br />

the aquifer. Because the reduction of some contaminants<br />

(trichloroethylene for example), the surface has a catalytic<br />

or surface coordination role in reduction, the presence of<br />

specific metals on the iron oxide surface can increase the<br />

electron transfer (reduction) rate. This concept has been<br />

applied to zero-valent iron walls, with the incorporation<br />

of trace amounts of Cr and Ni. A more efficient method<br />

would be to inject dithionite to produce reducing<br />

conditions in the aquifer, then add one or more reduced<br />

metal ions directly. We propose to amend the in situ<br />

redox manipulation technique through addition of<br />

additional reduced metal ions (e.g., Fe(ii), Ti(III)) to the<br />

redox injection. Cationic adsorption of reduced metal<br />

ions on the soil matrix should the produce a more reactive<br />

barrier.<br />

Introduction<br />

In this study, we investigated electron donors or reaction<br />

catalysts potential chemical additions.<br />

Fe(II) and Mn(II) additions (electron donors) resulted in a<br />

significant increase in trichloroethylene dechlorination.<br />

Trichloroethylene dechlorination with the Fe(II) addition<br />

was predictable and more efficient than the Mn(II). The<br />

additions of Ti(III), Ni(II), Pd catalyst, and EDTA did not<br />

enhance the trichloroethylene dechlorination rate in<br />

sediments, even though these compounds are used in<br />

engineered systems. Because the addition of an electron<br />

shuttle had only a slight positive effect, the rate of<br />

trichloroethylene degradation is not limited by electron<br />

transfer, so an additional electron donor rather than<br />

catalyst is likely more efficient. While an Fe(II) addition<br />

is expected to be more cost efficient than the use of<br />

reduced sediment alone, amending the redox treatment at<br />

the field scale involves additional hydraulic and<br />

geochemical considerations. Upscaling these results of<br />

using small to large experimental systems is needed to<br />

design viable field-scale injection schemes.<br />

Trichloroethylene dechlorination with reduced sediment<br />

relies on the oxidation of ferrous iron [adsorbed Fe(II),<br />

Fe(II)CO3, reduced smectite clays; Szecsody et al. 2000a,<br />

b]. In addition, adsorbed or structural Fe II on an Fe III -<br />

oxide or clay surface is necessary for dechlorination,<br />

either as a catalyst, a semiconductor, or to provide surface<br />

Eh conditions (Scherer et al. 1999; Wehrli 1992). The<br />

trichloroethylene degradation pathway using zero-valent<br />

iron (Roberts et al. 1996) and reduced sediments<br />

(Szecsody et al. 2000b) is reductive elimination producing<br />

chloroacetylene, then acetylene:<br />

Earth System Science 251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!