PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(species, sub-species, and sex), space-and-time-course of<br />
irradiation, space-and-time-course of modifying factors,<br />
time-course of biological change, and damage. The<br />
species (human, animal, plant, cells in vitro), sub-species<br />
(racial makeup, ethnicity), genetic predisposition<br />
(DNA repair), susceptibility, and sex (e.g., in humans,<br />
thyroid cancer risk is proportional to the number of<br />
X-chromosomes, and breast cancer risk is proportional to<br />
[the number of X-chromosomes] 10 ) all affect radiation<br />
risk. The stage of development as a function of age<br />
(embryo, fetus, infant, child, adult, elderly adult),<br />
reproductive status, and hormonal status must be<br />
accounted for. The space-and-time-course of irradiation,<br />
the instantaneous spatial distributions of ionizations and<br />
excitations throughout existence of organism, the dose,<br />
the dose rate, the fractionation, the “quality” or (linear<br />
energy transfer, or lineal energy) all must be known as a<br />
function of time (age) and as a function of tissue or body<br />
part. The space-and-time-course of modifying factors<br />
include diet, temperature, infectious agents, combined<br />
injury (trauma, burns), the state of organ function, the<br />
state of adaptive response (DNA repair stimulation), the<br />
presence or absence of other initiators, promoters, tumor<br />
progressors (smoking), oxygen, dehydration, exogenous<br />
chemicals (antioxidants, free radical scavengers), drugs,<br />
and medical interventions such as surgery, and all must be<br />
know as a function of time (age) and location in an<br />
organism.<br />
The dependent variable for such a radiation-detriment<br />
model is the time-course of biologic change and damage.<br />
The model must predict biomarkers, initiated cells,<br />
tumors, dermatitis, cataracts, etc., as a function of time<br />
(age) and location in organism. The same factors must be<br />
considered when calibrating the model from existing data.<br />
Given this very ambitions project, what is knowable?<br />
What radiation measurements would be sufficiently<br />
predictive? For external irradiation, tissue-equivalent<br />
proportional counters to record lineal energy spectra as a<br />
function of time for the entire body for the entire life are<br />
externally used to infer that which is occurring inside the<br />
body. For internal irradiation, it is difficult to imagine<br />
precise enough measurements of emissions from<br />
radionuclides in the body to compare with external<br />
measurements, so one must model the dose-related<br />
quantities.<br />
If thresholds exist, then only the irradiation that occurs<br />
above a certain dose rate matters (as shown below).<br />
Dose, especially committed dose, alone does not predict<br />
risk in this case. One must model the entire time course<br />
of irradiation in each tissue, and such models do not<br />
follow strictly linear dose-response relationships.<br />
Enhancement of GENII Code<br />
The GENII computer code for calculating 50-year<br />
committed effective dose equivalent (Napier et al.<br />
1988a-c) has been modified to calculate instantaneous<br />
dose rates to each organ and tissue, as well as<br />
radioactivity contents as a function of time. This<br />
capability permits the examination of thresholds in dose<br />
rate as suggested by generalizing the Ames and Gold<br />
(1990) “mitogenesis increases mutagenesis” assertion<br />
(Figure 1).<br />
Figure 1. Fraction of 50-year committed effective dose<br />
equivalent due to Pu content of various organs and tissues<br />
calculated by enhanced GENII code. With threshold<br />
responses for osteosarcoma and liver cancer, only 25% of<br />
dose leads to any risk at low doses.<br />
Thresholds<br />
An unexpected discovery was that many simplistic and<br />
incorrect inferences of dose thresholds result from<br />
plotting incidence or mortality data on a logarithmic dose<br />
scale (Strom 2000). A number of representative examples<br />
are listed below.<br />
Human Radium Exposure and Bone Cancer<br />
Analysis of human data for exposure to radium (Rowland<br />
1994) using new methods (Chomentowski et al. 1990)<br />
unequivocally indicates an alpha radiation dose threshold<br />
for osteosarcoma at about 8 Gy (Figure 2).<br />
Human Thorium Exposure and Liver Cancer<br />
The Advisory Committee on Radiological Protection<br />
(ACRP 1996) stated that there “appears to be a practical<br />
threshold of about 2 Gy to liver tissue for induction of<br />
liver cancer” by Thorotrast (p. E-9) based on<br />
epidemiology of Danish patients as reported in 1992<br />
(Andersson and Storm 1992). Thorotrast-exposed<br />
patients are the fourth largest human population<br />
Human Health and Safety 279