05.06.2013 Views

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(species, sub-species, and sex), space-and-time-course of<br />

irradiation, space-and-time-course of modifying factors,<br />

time-course of biological change, and damage. The<br />

species (human, animal, plant, cells in vitro), sub-species<br />

(racial makeup, ethnicity), genetic predisposition<br />

(DNA repair), susceptibility, and sex (e.g., in humans,<br />

thyroid cancer risk is proportional to the number of<br />

X-chromosomes, and breast cancer risk is proportional to<br />

[the number of X-chromosomes] 10 ) all affect radiation<br />

risk. The stage of development as a function of age<br />

(embryo, fetus, infant, child, adult, elderly adult),<br />

reproductive status, and hormonal status must be<br />

accounted for. The space-and-time-course of irradiation,<br />

the instantaneous spatial distributions of ionizations and<br />

excitations throughout existence of organism, the dose,<br />

the dose rate, the fractionation, the “quality” or (linear<br />

energy transfer, or lineal energy) all must be known as a<br />

function of time (age) and as a function of tissue or body<br />

part. The space-and-time-course of modifying factors<br />

include diet, temperature, infectious agents, combined<br />

injury (trauma, burns), the state of organ function, the<br />

state of adaptive response (DNA repair stimulation), the<br />

presence or absence of other initiators, promoters, tumor<br />

progressors (smoking), oxygen, dehydration, exogenous<br />

chemicals (antioxidants, free radical scavengers), drugs,<br />

and medical interventions such as surgery, and all must be<br />

know as a function of time (age) and location in an<br />

organism.<br />

The dependent variable for such a radiation-detriment<br />

model is the time-course of biologic change and damage.<br />

The model must predict biomarkers, initiated cells,<br />

tumors, dermatitis, cataracts, etc., as a function of time<br />

(age) and location in organism. The same factors must be<br />

considered when calibrating the model from existing data.<br />

Given this very ambitions project, what is knowable?<br />

What radiation measurements would be sufficiently<br />

predictive? For external irradiation, tissue-equivalent<br />

proportional counters to record lineal energy spectra as a<br />

function of time for the entire body for the entire life are<br />

externally used to infer that which is occurring inside the<br />

body. For internal irradiation, it is difficult to imagine<br />

precise enough measurements of emissions from<br />

radionuclides in the body to compare with external<br />

measurements, so one must model the dose-related<br />

quantities.<br />

If thresholds exist, then only the irradiation that occurs<br />

above a certain dose rate matters (as shown below).<br />

Dose, especially committed dose, alone does not predict<br />

risk in this case. One must model the entire time course<br />

of irradiation in each tissue, and such models do not<br />

follow strictly linear dose-response relationships.<br />

Enhancement of GENII Code<br />

The GENII computer code for calculating 50-year<br />

committed effective dose equivalent (Napier et al.<br />

1988a-c) has been modified to calculate instantaneous<br />

dose rates to each organ and tissue, as well as<br />

radioactivity contents as a function of time. This<br />

capability permits the examination of thresholds in dose<br />

rate as suggested by generalizing the Ames and Gold<br />

(1990) “mitogenesis increases mutagenesis” assertion<br />

(Figure 1).<br />

Figure 1. Fraction of 50-year committed effective dose<br />

equivalent due to Pu content of various organs and tissues<br />

calculated by enhanced GENII code. With threshold<br />

responses for osteosarcoma and liver cancer, only 25% of<br />

dose leads to any risk at low doses.<br />

Thresholds<br />

An unexpected discovery was that many simplistic and<br />

incorrect inferences of dose thresholds result from<br />

plotting incidence or mortality data on a logarithmic dose<br />

scale (Strom 2000). A number of representative examples<br />

are listed below.<br />

Human Radium Exposure and Bone Cancer<br />

Analysis of human data for exposure to radium (Rowland<br />

1994) using new methods (Chomentowski et al. 1990)<br />

unequivocally indicates an alpha radiation dose threshold<br />

for osteosarcoma at about 8 Gy (Figure 2).<br />

Human Thorium Exposure and Liver Cancer<br />

The Advisory Committee on Radiological Protection<br />

(ACRP 1996) stated that there “appears to be a practical<br />

threshold of about 2 Gy to liver tissue for induction of<br />

liver cancer” by Thorotrast (p. E-9) based on<br />

epidemiology of Danish patients as reported in 1992<br />

(Andersson and Storm 1992). Thorotrast-exposed<br />

patients are the fourth largest human population<br />

Human Health and Safety 279

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!