19.07.2013 Views

advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...

advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...

advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ond stress [N/mm²]<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

test series 1a<br />

test series 1b<br />

test series 1c<br />

0<br />

0,0 0,1<br />

slip[mm]<br />

0,2<br />

bond stress [N/mm²]<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Advanced Building Skins<br />

test series 2a<br />

test series 2b<br />

test series 2c<br />

0<br />

0,0 0,1<br />

slip [mm]<br />

0,2<br />

Figure 9: Bond stress-slip rel<strong>at</strong>ionship of test series 1-3<br />

4.3 Bending Behavior<br />

For the investig<strong>at</strong>ion of principle bending behavior of thin walled UHPC pl<strong>at</strong>es with steel-fibers and<br />

centric CFRP lamellae, 4-point bending tests were carried out in February <strong>2012</strong> <strong>at</strong> the Labor<strong>at</strong>ory for<br />

Structural Engineering. The pl<strong>at</strong>e elements had a thickness of 2,5 cm and spanned a length of 60 cm.<br />

The CFRP surface was roughened with fine sand, as described before.<br />

In order to get comparison values, the tests were carried out with two different types of reinforcement:<br />

UHPC pl<strong>at</strong>es with steel fibers and 3 centric CFRP-lamellae (test series 1), and UHPC pl<strong>at</strong>es with steel<br />

fiber reinforcement only (test series 2). The test´s intention was to investig<strong>at</strong>e the influence of centric<br />

CFRP-reinforcement on stiffness, crack form<strong>at</strong>ion and maximum load capacity of thin UHPC pl<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

Figure 10: Cross section of the UHPC pl<strong>at</strong>e used for test series<br />

The test results show th<strong>at</strong> UHPC pl<strong>at</strong>es with centric CFRP reinforcement (test series 1) had an almost<br />

8 times higher breaking load than those without (test series 2). Consequently, the reinforcement causes<br />

a significant increase of load bearing capacity. The bending stiffness EJ I in the non-cracked condition<br />

was <strong>15</strong>0.000 (test series 1) and 120.000 kNcm² (test series 2), the concrete cracked <strong>at</strong> a moment of 35<br />

kNcm (test series 1) and 31 kNcm (test series 2). Thus, the centric CFRP reinforcement did not increase<br />

bending stiffness in non-cracked condition and crack moment substantially.<br />

bending moment [kNm]<br />

3,5<br />

3,0<br />

2,5<br />

2,0<br />

1,5<br />

1,0<br />

0,5<br />

test series 1a<br />

test series 1b<br />

0,0<br />

0 5 10 <strong>15</strong> 20 25 30 35 40<br />

deform<strong>at</strong>ion [mm]<br />

Figure 11: Bending moment-deform<strong>at</strong>ion rel<strong>at</strong>ionship of test series 1 and 2<br />

- 7 -<br />

bending moment [kNm]<br />

3,5<br />

3,0<br />

2,5<br />

2,0<br />

1,5<br />

1,0<br />

0,5<br />

bond stress [N/mm²]<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

test series 3a<br />

test series 3b<br />

test series 3c<br />

0<br />

0,0 0,1<br />

slip [mm]<br />

0,2<br />

test series 2a<br />

test series 2b<br />

test series 2c<br />

0,0<br />

0 5 10 <strong>15</strong> 20 25 30 35 40<br />

deform<strong>at</strong>ion [mm]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!