advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...
advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...
advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 Comparison<br />
Advanced Building Skins<br />
As demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed in this work, textiles have the ability to offer an extremely lightweight altern<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
facade solution. In addition, the textile facade can provide n<strong>at</strong>ural light to the interior, while <strong>at</strong> the<br />
same time reduce glare and, through the use of transparent insul<strong>at</strong>ion, thermally insul<strong>at</strong>e the interior<br />
spaces. Next, textiles offer the possibility of very large panel sizes, reducing the install<strong>at</strong>ion time<br />
required. And lastly, textiles can provide us with a fully recyclable m<strong>at</strong>erial. Tensiwall was<br />
theoretically applied to a number of <strong>building</strong>s across the world and compared in many performance<br />
and visual c<strong>at</strong>egories (see Figure 9 for a visual applic<strong>at</strong>ion of Tensiwall to an existing <strong>building</strong>).<br />
Because the Tensiwall system previously discussed (Section 3) was designed for use in high-rise<br />
applic<strong>at</strong>ions, this section compares it to a typical <strong>advanced</strong> high-rise facade. The comparison discussed<br />
is between another existing <strong>building</strong> facade in the United St<strong>at</strong>es, while the Tensiwall facade system<br />
was hypothetically applied to the <strong>building</strong> structure. Table 1 provides a detailed evalu<strong>at</strong>ion of the two<br />
systems, comparing various performance inform<strong>at</strong>ion as applied to 1 m 2 of facade area.<br />
Table 1: Existing Curtainwall and Tensiwall System Analysis (per 1 m 2 ) [3] [4] [5] [6]<br />
Facade Characteristic Existing Curtainwall Tensiwall<br />
M<strong>at</strong>erials Cost ($)<br />
Insul<strong>at</strong>ing Glass: 479<br />
Insul<strong>at</strong>ion: Included<br />
Glare Reduction: 392<br />
- 8 -<br />
Membranes: 476<br />
Insul<strong>at</strong>ion: 184<br />
Glare Reduction: Included<br />
Total M<strong>at</strong>erials Cost ($) 871 660<br />
Total Light Transmittance (%) 58 45<br />
Weight (kg)<br />
Glass: 375<br />
Aluminum: 25<br />
Insul<strong>at</strong>ion: Included<br />
Glare Reduction: 25<br />
Membranes: 6<br />
Glass: 94<br />
Aluminum: 12<br />
Insul<strong>at</strong>ion: 11<br />
Glare Reduction: Included<br />
Total Weight (kg) 425 123<br />
Number of Panels 0.16 0.03<br />
Recyclability (%) Glass: 0<br />
Membranes: 100<br />
Glass: 0<br />
Total Recyclability (%) 0 75<br />
Reusability (%) Glass: 100<br />
Membranes: 100<br />
Glass: 100<br />
Total Reusability (%) 100 100<br />
Repurposability (%) Glass: 100<br />
Membranes: 100<br />
Glass: 100<br />
Total Repurposability (%) 100 100<br />
Looking <strong>at</strong> a very rough m<strong>at</strong>erials cost only, the two systems are somewh<strong>at</strong> comparable, with<br />
Tensiwall costing less than the existing one. In fact, the cost can be reduced even further, depending<br />
on the type of textile used. This estim<strong>at</strong>e is based solely on the cost of the m<strong>at</strong>erials, as the fabric<br />
exterior wall system has never been built. However, it does provide a general and inform<strong>at</strong>ive