19.07.2013 Views

advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...

advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...

advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Primary energy,<br />

non renewable<br />

kWh per m² GFA<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

‐25<br />

‐50<br />

‐75<br />

‐100<br />

‐125<br />

‐<strong>15</strong>0<br />

‐175<br />

‐200<br />

‐225<br />

‐250<br />

Advanced Building Skins<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 <strong>14</strong> 16 18 20 22 24 26 28<br />

‐100<br />

30 years<br />

- 7 -<br />

Greenhouse gas<br />

emissions<br />

kg CO 2‐Equ. per m² GFA<br />

EPS (30 kg/m³) PE‐non‐ren. Wood fibre PE‐non‐ren.<br />

Glass wool PE‐non‐ren. Flax board PE‐non‐ren.<br />

EPS (30 kg/m³) GWP100 Wood fibre GWP100<br />

Glass wool GWP100 Flax board GWP100<br />

Figure 3: Ecological profile of insul<strong>at</strong>ion m<strong>at</strong>erials per square meter gross floor area. Comparison of opaque PH<br />

skin Mühlweg-C with LEH-skin scenario 5-a. Differences of nonrenewable primary energy demand and<br />

greenhouse gas emissions per gross floor area (GFA) for production, disposal and 30 years <strong>building</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

2.3 Differences of LC-D<strong>at</strong>abases<br />

A sensitivity analysis was done for the assessment of insul<strong>at</strong>ion m<strong>at</strong>erials by comparing different<br />

d<strong>at</strong>abases with life cycle impact d<strong>at</strong>a for insul<strong>at</strong>ion m<strong>at</strong>erials. The d<strong>at</strong>a for production (cradle to g<strong>at</strong>e<br />

analysis) and production combined with end of life processes were analyzed. D<strong>at</strong>abases Ökobau.d<strong>at</strong><br />

2009 (ÖBD) [5], Ecoinvent 2.2 (ECOINV) [7] and Baubook [8] have been compared. Major<br />

differences of the methodology behind the d<strong>at</strong>abases are:<br />

Energy mix (electrical energy mix) for production and for environmental credits of thermal<br />

tre<strong>at</strong>ment with combined he<strong>at</strong> and power gener<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Share of secondary raw m<strong>at</strong>erials: E.g. the share of waste glass for glass wool production is<br />

65 % in Ecoinvent and 0 % in Ökobau.d<strong>at</strong>.<br />

CO2 intake of biogenic m<strong>at</strong>erial by photosynthesis: Considered in Ökobau.d<strong>at</strong> and Baubook<br />

Environmental credits <strong>at</strong> end of life:<br />

o Ökobau.d<strong>at</strong> includes environmental credits e.g. the end-of-life process for wood fiber<br />

boards is thermal waste tre<strong>at</strong>ment with combined he<strong>at</strong> and power gener<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> substitute<br />

electrical energy (German mix) and fossil gas.<br />

o Ecoinvent does not consider environmental credits. The recovery of energy by thermal<br />

waste tre<strong>at</strong>ment is considered within the process(es) for waste tre<strong>at</strong>ment and improves the<br />

energy mix.<br />

o Baubook does not include end of life processes<br />

Generally there are considerable differences for all insul<strong>at</strong>ion m<strong>at</strong>erials and the range and r<strong>at</strong>io of<br />

impact d<strong>at</strong>a are varying for each m<strong>at</strong>erial (figure 4):<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

‐10<br />

‐20<br />

‐30<br />

‐40<br />

‐50<br />

‐60<br />

‐70<br />

‐80<br />

‐90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!