19.07.2013 Views

advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...

advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...

advanced building skins 14 | 15 June 2012 - lamp.tugraz.at - Graz ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Advanced Building Skins<br />

comply with the LEH-standard. The results indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> the planned target values for space he<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

had been achieved. The target-actual-comparison based on measured energy consumption showed<br />

good m<strong>at</strong>ches in general for all housing est<strong>at</strong>es. The consumption of useful energy was about on the<br />

same level as the calcul<strong>at</strong>ed demand values for space he<strong>at</strong>ing considering an actual indoor air<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure of 23 °C and actual clim<strong>at</strong>e d<strong>at</strong>a. [1], [2], [4]<br />

The PH standard saved about 30 kWh/(m².a) delivered energy on average compared with conventional<br />

housing est<strong>at</strong>es of the same construction period [1]. Many of the conventional reference <strong>building</strong>s<br />

already comply with LEH standard because of legal regul<strong>at</strong>ions for subsidized residential <strong>building</strong>s.<br />

Nevertheless, critical voices claim th<strong>at</strong> PH might have a worse life cycle performance than LEH e.g.<br />

due to higher electrical energy consumption for the ventil<strong>at</strong>ion system or due to higher ecological<br />

effort for the production of the <strong>building</strong> skin. Therefore the main questions of this paper were:<br />

How much environmental benefit is actually achieved by PH compared to conventional<br />

residential complexes?<br />

Impact of different insul<strong>at</strong>ion m<strong>at</strong>erials and different insul<strong>at</strong>ion thickness of external thermal<br />

insul<strong>at</strong>ion composite systems (ETICS) on the life cycle performance?<br />

1 Methodology<br />

1.1 Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings and Building M<strong>at</strong>erials<br />

Building m<strong>at</strong>erials were investig<strong>at</strong>ed from cradle (raw m<strong>at</strong>erials extraction) to grave (dismantling and<br />

end-of-life assessment). The methodology of the BNB system “Assessment System for Sustainable<br />

Building” (BMVBS [6]) of the German federal ministry of transport, <strong>building</strong> and urban development<br />

has been applied. This methodology is mand<strong>at</strong>ory for federal <strong>building</strong>s in Germany and the life cycle<br />

assessment is consistent with the certific<strong>at</strong>ion system of ÖGNI (Austrian sustainable <strong>building</strong> council)<br />

and DGNB (German sustainable <strong>building</strong> council) as well as with EN <strong>15</strong>978 and EN <strong>15</strong>804.<br />

According to this methodology a service life of 50 years is assumed for the assessment of residential<br />

<strong>building</strong>s and maintenance is taken into account by default values for the service life of <strong>building</strong><br />

m<strong>at</strong>erials.<br />

The environmental impact was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed with the d<strong>at</strong>abase “Ökobau.d<strong>at</strong> 2009” [5] th<strong>at</strong> is used for the<br />

BNB, ÖGNI and DGNB certific<strong>at</strong>ion and is based on the d<strong>at</strong>abase of PE Intern<strong>at</strong>ional and on EPD<br />

d<strong>at</strong>asets (environmental product declar<strong>at</strong>ions according to ISO <strong>14</strong>025) verified by IBU (Institute<br />

Construction and Environment e. V., Königswinter). As functional unit or service unit 1 m² gross floor<br />

area with clim<strong>at</strong>ic conditioning according to OIB [3] was used. The conversion factors of the Austrian<br />

<strong>building</strong> directive [3] have been used and are listed in table 1.<br />

Table 1: Conversion factors for primary energy and greenhouse gas emissions [3]<br />

Delivered energy Nonrenewable primary energy<br />

kWh/kWh<br />

- 2 -<br />

CO2 emissions*<br />

g/kWh<br />

Electrical energy 2.<strong>15</strong> 617<br />

Fossil gas 1.17 236<br />

* The OIB directive [3] for the calcul<strong>at</strong>ion of the energy certific<strong>at</strong>e of <strong>building</strong>s uses<br />

CO2-emissions instead of CO2-equivalents as indic<strong>at</strong>or for clim<strong>at</strong>e protection.<br />

1.2 Description of Passive Housing Est<strong>at</strong>e Mühlweg-C<br />

The housing est<strong>at</strong>e Mühlweg-C was completed in 2006 in Passive House standard with support of the<br />

impulse program “Building of Tomorrow” of bmvit (Federal Ministry for Transport, Innov<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />

Technology). The complex consists of four <strong>building</strong>s with a mixed structure of massive timber and<br />

concrete. 70 residential units have been realized with an eligible useable living area of 6748 m².

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!