19.07.2013 Views

Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic - Legislationline

Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic - Legislationline

Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic - Legislationline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that. Upon returning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> defendant in <strong>the</strong> court room, he/ she must be informed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

testimony <strong>of</strong> such persons, and allowed to ask questions to such persons.<br />

(4) The victim and <strong>the</strong> witnesses under <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> sixteen shall be removed from <strong>the</strong> courtroom<br />

after <strong>the</strong> interrogation, except in instances when <strong>the</strong> court finds <strong>the</strong>ir fur<strong>the</strong>r presence<br />

necessary.<br />

Article 294. Announcement <strong>of</strong> Testimony <strong>of</strong> Victim and Witnesses<br />

(1) The testimony <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> victim and witness given in <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> investigation may be<br />

announced, and <strong>the</strong> audio tape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir testimony, or video tape or a film may be reproduced<br />

by <strong>the</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties, in <strong>the</strong> following cases:<br />

1) in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> substantial conflict between <strong>the</strong>se testimony and testimony provided in<br />

court;<br />

2) in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> victim or witness in <strong>the</strong> court due to reasons which exclude <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

appearance;<br />

3) in case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir refusal to testify.<br />

(2) The rules specified in point (1) <strong>of</strong> this Article shall also apply to <strong>the</strong> instances <strong>of</strong><br />

announcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> testimony by victim or witness previously given in <strong>the</strong> court.<br />

(3) Testimony <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> victim and <strong>the</strong> defendant interrogated in accordance with point (2) <strong>of</strong><br />

Article 285 here<strong>of</strong>, may be also announced in <strong>the</strong> hearing.<br />

(4) The audio record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> testimony <strong>of</strong> a victim or witness, <strong>the</strong> video tape or a film <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

interrogation may be also reproduced in accordance with <strong>the</strong> rules established in point (3) <strong>of</strong><br />

Article 289 here<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Article 295. Conduct <strong>of</strong> Expertise in Court<br />

(1) By <strong>the</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> parties, <strong>the</strong> court may appoint an expertise in <strong>the</strong> hearing. The experts who<br />

gave <strong>the</strong>ir opinion during investigation, or o<strong>the</strong>r experts appointed by court shall conduct that<br />

expertise.<br />

(2) The expertise shall be conducted in court in accordance with <strong>the</strong> rules stated in Chapter 25<br />

here<strong>of</strong>.<br />

(3) After announcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decision (resolution) on appointment <strong>of</strong> expertise, <strong>the</strong> presiding<br />

judge shall explain to <strong>the</strong> parties <strong>the</strong>ir right to dismiss an expert, to file a motion to include in<br />

<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> experts a person indicated by a party, to conduct <strong>the</strong> expertise by<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r expert institution, or to conduct <strong>the</strong> expertise in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />

parties.<br />

(4) In <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hearing, <strong>the</strong> expert may ask questions to <strong>the</strong> interrogated persons,<br />

familiarize himself/ herself with written evidence, records <strong>of</strong> investigative actions, opinions<br />

<strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r experts, participate in examination, experiments, and o<strong>the</strong>r court actions relevant to<br />

<strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expertise.<br />

(5) Should it be necessary that <strong>the</strong> expert obtain <strong>the</strong> samples for comparative examination, rules<br />

<strong>of</strong> Article 207 here<strong>of</strong> shall apply.<br />

(6) In clarifying all circumstances, significant for giving opinion, <strong>the</strong> presiding judge suggests<br />

that parties present <strong>the</strong>ir questions to <strong>the</strong> expert in writing. The posed questions must be<br />

announced, and opinions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trial must be heard. The court shall review<br />

<strong>the</strong>se questions and decide to exclude those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m which are not relevant to <strong>the</strong> case or <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!