Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic - Legislationline
Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic - Legislationline
Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic - Legislationline
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>the</strong> asked questions he shall compile a motivated information on impossibility to provide an<br />
opinion and shall file it with a body or person who assigned an expert examination.<br />
Article 210. Expert interrogation<br />
(1) Any investigator shall be authorized to interrogate an expert in order for him to explain <strong>the</strong><br />
provided by him opinion. Any expert may himself provide his explanations. The transcript <strong>of</strong><br />
his interrogation shall be compiled in accordance with <strong>the</strong> rules established by Articles 170<br />
and 195 <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Code</strong>.<br />
(2) Expert’s interrogation before providing <strong>of</strong> his opinion shall be prohibited.<br />
Article 211. Expert examination opinion submittance to <strong>the</strong> suspect, accused, victim and<br />
witness<br />
(1) Expert examination opinion or his announcement on impossibility to provide an opinion, as<br />
well as a transcript <strong>of</strong> an expert’s interrogation proceedings before a completion <strong>of</strong> a<br />
prosecution shall be submitted to <strong>the</strong> suspect, accused, victim as well as a witness who was<br />
examined who shall be authorized to provide <strong>the</strong>ir explanations and state <strong>the</strong>ir objections on<br />
expert examination opinion. In case such a motion is redressed or waved <strong>the</strong> investigator<br />
shall render a relevant resolution that shall be announced to a person who filed a motion and<br />
a receipt on that shall be taken from him.<br />
(2) The transcript <strong>of</strong> proceedings shall be compiled on acknowledgment with an expert<br />
examination opinion and a transcript <strong>of</strong> his interrogation proceedings that shall reveal <strong>the</strong><br />
stated statements or objections<br />
(3) The rules <strong>of</strong> this Article shall be also applicable in cases when an expert examination was<br />
enforced before <strong>the</strong> attraction <strong>of</strong> a person as <strong>the</strong> accused or his recognizance as <strong>the</strong> suspect or<br />
a victim.<br />
Article 212. Additional and repeated expert examination<br />
(1) When an expert opinion is not detailed or complete or <strong>the</strong>re appeared new issues on <strong>the</strong><br />
earlier researched circumstances an additional expert examination may be appointed assigned<br />
to be enforced by <strong>the</strong> same or ano<strong>the</strong>r expert.<br />
(2) In case <strong>the</strong>re appeared some doubts in <strong>the</strong> correctness <strong>of</strong> an expert opinion a repeated expert<br />
examination may be appointed assigned to be enforced by ano<strong>the</strong>r expert or experts.<br />
(3) Additional and repeated expert examinations shall be appointed and enforced in accordance<br />
with <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> Articles 199, 202, 206, 209 <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Code</strong>.<br />
SECTION 26. IMPLEADING AS THE ACCUSED. BRINGING OF A CHARGE<br />
Article 213. Impleading as <strong>the</strong> accused<br />
When <strong>the</strong>re is enough evidence pointing at committing <strong>of</strong> a crime by a definite person <strong>the</strong><br />
investigator shall render a motivated resolution on <strong>the</strong> person’s impleading as <strong>the</strong> accused.