Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic - Legislationline

(1) In order to undertake a comparative research the investigator shall be authorized to receive
samples of handwriting and other samples necessary from the suspect or the accused.
(2) Any investigator shall be also authorized to receive samples of handwriting and other
samples for a comparative research from a witness or victim but only with their consent and
in cases when it is necessary to check whether they left prints in a place of event or on
exhibits.
(3) It shall be prohibited in receiving samples for a comparative research to use methods that are
dangerous for the life and health of a person or humiliate his dignity.
(4) Any investigator shall render a resolution on receiving of samples for a comparative research
of alive persons. In necessary cases the receiving of samples shall be made with a
participation of specialists and a transcript on proceedings shall be compiled on that in
accordance with the requirements established by Articles 170 and 171 of this Code.
(5) If receiving of samples is a part of an expert’s research it shall be made by an expert. In this
case an expert shall reveal an information on the action in his opinion.
Article 208. Placing into a medical agency in order to enforce an expert examination
(1) If in the course of an appointment or enforcement of a medical or legal medical expert
examination there appeared a necessity to enforce a review over the suspect or the accused
under the conditions of a state hospital he may be placed into a hospital and that shall be
specified in a resolution on expert examination appointment.
(2) If an issue on a necessity to appoint a medical or medical expert examination and placing of
the accused into hospital appeared in the course of a trial the decision on that shall be taken
by court on the motion of the parties or its own initiative and a ruling (resolution) on that
shall be rendered.
(3) In placing of the suspect to a hospital in order to enforce medical expert examination the time
limit within which he has to be charged shall be interrupted until the receipt an opinion of
doctors- psychiatrist on a mental state of the suspect.
Article 209. The content of an expert’s opinion, information on impossibility to provide an
opinion
(1) Having made a research with regard to its results an expert or experts in their name shall
compile an opinion that shall specify when, who , whom (full name, education, profile, labor
experience, scientific degree, position) and on what grounds made an expert examination; the
remark certified with an expert’s signature that he was warned about a criminal responsibility
for a wave of or deviation from providing an opinion, who was present at an expert
examination enforcement and what explanations were provided, what materials an expert
used and what research made, questions asked to an expert and his motivated answers. If in
the course of expert examination enforcement an expert substantiates the circumstances that
are important for a case with regard to which he was asked questions he shall be authorized
to specify them in his opinion.
(2) If an expert finds out that the asked questions are beyond the limits of his special knowledge
or submitted to him materials may not be used or are insufficient for providing of an opinion
and may not be executed or the state of scientific and expert practice does not let him answer