21.07.2013 Views

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Identify Listed M/WBEs<br />

M/WBE Availability in the City <strong>of</strong> Clevel<strong>and</strong>’s Market Area<br />

While extensive, Dun & Bradstreet does not sufficiently identify all businesses owned by<br />

minorities or women. Although many such businesses are correctly identified in Dun &<br />

Bradstreet, experience has demonstrated that many are also missed. For this reason, several<br />

additional steps were required to identify the appropriate percentage <strong>of</strong> M/WBEs in the relevant<br />

market.<br />

First, NERA <strong>com</strong>pleted an intensive regional search for information on minority-owned <strong>and</strong><br />

woman-owned businesses in Clevel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the surrounding area. Beyond the information<br />

already in Dun & Bradstreet/Hoover’s, NERA collected lists <strong>of</strong> M\WBEs from the City <strong>of</strong><br />

Clevel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> other public <strong>and</strong> private entities. Specifically, directories were included from:<br />

American Indian Search, Black Pages Ohio, Business Research Services Inc., the City <strong>of</strong> Akron,<br />

the City <strong>of</strong> Canton, the City <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati, the City <strong>of</strong> Columbus, the City <strong>of</strong> Ft. Wayne, the City<br />

<strong>of</strong> Springfield, Diversity Information Resources, DiversityBusiness.<strong>com</strong>, Greater Cincinnati<br />

African American Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Green County, Indiana Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Administration, Indo-American Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Japan/America Society <strong>of</strong> Kentucky,<br />

Michigan Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation, the National Center for American Indian Enterprise<br />

Development, Native American Business Alliance, New York <strong>State</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Development, New York <strong>State</strong> Unified Certification Program, Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer<br />

District, Ohio Department <strong>of</strong> Administrative Services, Ohio Department <strong>of</strong> Development, Ohio<br />

Unified Certification Program, Pennsylvania Department <strong>of</strong> General Services, Pennsylvania<br />

Unified Certification Program, Small Business Administration, Summit County, U.S.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, United <strong>State</strong>s <strong>Women</strong>’s Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce, <strong>Women</strong> Business<br />

Enterprise National Council <strong>and</strong> MWBE.<strong>com</strong>. 217<br />

If the listed M/WBEs identified in Tables 4.9–4.20 are in fact all M/WBEs <strong>and</strong> are the only<br />

M/WBEs among all <strong>of</strong> the businesses identified in Tables 4.1–4.8, then an estimate <strong>of</strong> “listed”<br />

M/WBE availability is simply the number <strong>of</strong> listed M/WBEs (taken from Tables 4.9–4.20,<br />

respectively) divided by the total number <strong>of</strong> businesses in the relevant market (taken from Tables<br />

4.1-4.8, respectively). However, as we shall see below, neither <strong>of</strong> these two conditions holds true<br />

in practice <strong>and</strong> this is therefore not an appropriate method for measuring M/WBE availability.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are two reasons for this. First, it is likely that some proportion <strong>of</strong> the M/WBEs listed in the<br />

tables is not actually minority-owned or women-owned. Second, it is likely that there are<br />

additional “unlisted” M/WBEs among all <strong>of</strong> the businesses included in Tables 4.1–4.8. Such<br />

businesses do not appear in any <strong>of</strong> the directories we gathered <strong>and</strong> are therefore not included as<br />

M/WBEs in Tables 4.9-4.20. Additional steps are required to test these two conditions <strong>and</strong> to<br />

arrive at a more accurate representation <strong>of</strong> M/WBE availability within the Baseline Business<br />

Universe. We discuss these steps in Sections 3.A <strong>and</strong> 3.B below.<br />

217 We also obtained information from certain entities that was duplicative <strong>of</strong> either Dun & Bradstreet or one or<br />

more <strong>of</strong> the other sources listed above. <strong>The</strong>se entities are listed below in Appendix B. We were unable to obtain<br />

relevant lists or directories from a number <strong>of</strong> entities. <strong>The</strong> reasons for this include: (1) the entity did not have a<br />

list or the entity’s list did not include race <strong>and</strong> sex information; (2) the entity was unresponsive to repeated<br />

attempts at contacts; or, (3) the entity simply declined to provide us the list. <strong>The</strong>se entities, as well, are listed in<br />

Appendix B.<br />

NERA Economic Consulting 103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!