21.07.2013 Views

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Statistical Disparities in Capital Markets<br />

difficulties <strong>and</strong> to determine the personal collateral available should the firm default on its<br />

obligation. We do have measures <strong>of</strong> the owner’s human capital in the form <strong>of</strong> education <strong>and</strong><br />

experience, which likely capture at least some <strong>of</strong> the differential in available personal wealth<br />

across firm owners. Nevertheless, our potentially in<strong>com</strong>plete characterization <strong>of</strong> the business<br />

owner’s personal financial condition in the 1993 NSSBF dataset may introduce a bias into our<br />

analysis if African American business owners have fewer resources than nonminority business<br />

owners. As we will see below, however, <strong>and</strong> as noted in the previous footnote, this deficiency is<br />

rectified in the 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2003 SSBF datasets, with little change in the main findings.<br />

To assess the potential impact <strong>of</strong> this problem on our results, we separately examined groups <strong>of</strong><br />

firms who differ in the degree to which personal finances should influence the loan decision <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>com</strong>pare the estimated disadvantage experienced by African American-owned firms in different<br />

groups. First, we examine proprietorships <strong>and</strong> partnerships separately from corporations since<br />

owners <strong>of</strong> incorporated businesses are at least somewhat shielded from incurring the costs <strong>of</strong> a<br />

failed business. Second, we divide firms according to size. 280 Both larger small businesses <strong>and</strong><br />

those that have been in existence for some time are more likely to rely on the business’s funds,<br />

rather than the owner’s, to repay its obligations. Third, we consider firms that have applied for<br />

loans to obtain working capital separately from those firms that seek funds for other purposes<br />

(mainly to purchase vehicles, machinery <strong>and</strong> equipment, <strong>and</strong> buildings or l<strong>and</strong>). Loans made for<br />

one <strong>of</strong> these other purposes are at least partially collateralized because the financial institution<br />

could sell them, albeit at a potentially somewhat reduced rate, should the small business<br />

default. 281<br />

Results from these analyses provide no indication that omitting the owner’s personal wealth<br />

substantially biases the results presented above in Tables 6.8 <strong>and</strong> 6.9. Estimates presented in row<br />

numbers 1 through 8 <strong>of</strong> Table 6.10 indicate that African American-owned small businesses are<br />

significantly more likely to have their loan applications rejected regardless <strong>of</strong> the category <strong>of</strong><br />

firm considered. In particular, when samples are restricted to corporations, larger firms, <strong>and</strong><br />

firms seeking credit for uses other than working capital, African American-owned firms are 21,<br />

20, <strong>and</strong> 15 percentage points more likely, respectively, to have their loan application rejected<br />

even though personal resources should be less important in these categories. Moreover, in each<br />

group where there are two types <strong>of</strong> firms (large <strong>and</strong> small, etc.), the estimates for the two types<br />

<strong>of</strong> firms are not significantly different from each other.<br />

280 As reported earlier, the mean <strong>and</strong> median size <strong>of</strong> firms is 5.5 <strong>and</strong> 31.6 full-time equivalent workers, respectively.<br />

Fourteen percent <strong>of</strong> firms have one or fewer employees <strong>and</strong> 27 percent have two or fewer employees. In the<br />

ENC, the mean <strong>and</strong> median size <strong>of</strong> firms is 6.0 <strong>and</strong> 34.3 full-time equivalent workers, respectively. Twelve<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> firms have one or fewer employees <strong>and</strong> 26 percent have two or fewer employees.<br />

281 As indicated earlier, greater personal wealth may improve a small business’s chances <strong>of</strong> obtaining credit because<br />

it provides collateral should the loan go bad <strong>and</strong> because wealthy owners can use their own resources to weather<br />

bad times, improving the likelihood <strong>of</strong> repayment. Our separate analysis <strong>of</strong> corporations <strong>and</strong> proprietorships <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> large <strong>and</strong> small firms does not account for this second reason because corporations <strong>and</strong> large businesses may<br />

still need to draw on the owner’s personal wealth to help it survive short-term shocks. Businesses that have been<br />

in existence for several years, however, are less likely to experience these shocks, making them less likely to<br />

require infusions from the owner’s personal wealth. A loan used to purchase equipment that can be sold if the<br />

firm defaults similarly insulates the bank from the need to seek repayment directly from the owner.<br />

NERA Economic Consulting 202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!