21.07.2013 Views

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Market-Based Disparities in Business Formation <strong>and</strong> Business Owner Earnings<br />

Table 5.15 shows <strong>com</strong>parable SBO data for the construction sector in the U.S. as a whole. Here,<br />

large disparities are evident for African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans, Native<br />

Hawaiians <strong>and</strong> Pacific Isl<strong>and</strong>ers, <strong>and</strong> women. For example, although African Americans account<br />

for 3.75 percent <strong>of</strong> all firms in construction, they earn only 0.88 percent <strong>of</strong> all sales <strong>and</strong> receipts<br />

in that sector. Hispanics account for 10.16 percent <strong>of</strong> firms but only 3.79 percent <strong>of</strong> receipts. For<br />

Asians, the figures are 2.11 percent <strong>and</strong> 1.24 percent, respectively. For Native Americans, the<br />

figures are 1.12 percent <strong>and</strong> 0.56 percent, respectively. For women, disparities are not as acute as<br />

for minorities but are still fairly large. <strong>Women</strong> account for 8.01 percent <strong>of</strong> all construction firms<br />

but earned only 6.46 percent <strong>of</strong> construction sales <strong>and</strong> receipts.<br />

Among firms with paid employees, large disparities are observed for African Americans,<br />

Hispanics, <strong>and</strong> Native Americans. Overall, disparities in this category appear somewhat less<br />

acute than among firms as a whole. However, they remain far larger than <strong>com</strong>parable figures for<br />

nonminority male-owned firms. This is evident in that the fraction <strong>of</strong> employer firms <strong>com</strong>pared<br />

to the fraction <strong>of</strong> all firms is far higher among nonminority males than among other race <strong>and</strong><br />

gender groups. In Table 5.15, for example, nonminority males represent 62.52 percent <strong>of</strong> all<br />

firms but 66.27 percent <strong>of</strong> employer firms. For all other groups, the direction <strong>of</strong> this ratio is<br />

reversed. That is, each group’s fraction among employer firms is smaller than its fraction among<br />

firms as a whole, whereas for nonminority males it is larger.<br />

Table 5.16 shows <strong>com</strong>parable results for the construction sector in Ohio. Among all firms in<br />

construction, large disparities are observed for African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, Native<br />

Americans, <strong>and</strong> women. Among firms with paid employees, large disparities are observed for<br />

Hispanics <strong>and</strong> women. As in Table 5.15, nonminority males have a much higher ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

employer firms to firms as a whole than do minorities.<br />

NERA Economic Consulting 179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!