21.07.2013 Views

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Differences in Loan Denial Rates by Race/Ethnicity<br />

Statistical Disparities in Capital Markets<br />

In 1998 as in 1993, in <strong>com</strong>parison with firms owned by nonminority males, minority- <strong>and</strong><br />

female-owned firms were less creditworthy, more likely to have their loan applications turned<br />

down, more likely not to apply for a loan for fear <strong>of</strong> being denied, <strong>and</strong> consistently smaller <strong>and</strong><br />

younger. Moreover, their owners had lower amounts <strong>of</strong> both home <strong>and</strong> non-home equity.<br />

<strong>Minority</strong>-owned firms in general, <strong>and</strong> African American-owned firms in particular, were much<br />

less likely to be classified as having a “low risk” credit rating by Dun & Bradstreet. 290<br />

In the 1993 survey, respondents were asked “During the last three years has the firm applied for<br />

credit or asked for the renewal <strong>of</strong> terms on an existing loan?” In 1998, a narrower question<br />

limited to new loans was asked—“Did the firm apply for new loans in the last three years?” In<br />

1993, 43 percent answered the question in the affirmative <strong>com</strong>pared with 27 percent in 1998.<br />

Despite the fact that in 1993 the question was broader, the pattern <strong>of</strong> denials by race <strong>and</strong> gender<br />

is similar across the years. As can be seen below, minority-owned firms were especially likely to<br />

have their loan applications denied.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> Loan Applications Denied<br />

1993 1998<br />

Nonminority males 26.2% 24.4%<br />

African Americans 65.9% 62.3%<br />

Asian/Pacific Isl<strong>and</strong>ers, Native Americans, etc. 39.9% 47.0%<br />

Hispanics 35.9% 49.9%<br />

Nonminority females 30.1% 23.5%<br />

Overall 28.8% 28.6%<br />

Similarly, the proportion <strong>of</strong> firms reporting that they did not apply for fear <strong>of</strong> being denied is<br />

similar by race, ethnicity, <strong>and</strong> gender across the two survey years. More than half <strong>of</strong> African<br />

American owners did not apply for a loan for fear <strong>of</strong> being denied <strong>com</strong>pared with only one out <strong>of</strong><br />

five nonminority males.<br />

Percentage Not Applying for Fear <strong>of</strong> Denial<br />

1993 1998<br />

Nonminority males 22.5% 20.2%<br />

African Americans 60.7% 53.9%<br />

Asian/Pacific Isl<strong>and</strong>ers, Native Americans, etc. 27.5% 23.1%<br />

Hispanics 41.5% 34.3%<br />

Nonminority females 22.7% 24.2%<br />

Overall 24.7% 23.3%<br />

In the 1998 SSBF survey, respondents who were denied loans were asked if they believed there<br />

were reasons other than the <strong>of</strong>ficial ones provided by their financial institution as to why their<br />

loan applications were turned down. Among numerous options provided were the following:<br />

a) Prejudice on a racial/ethnic basis.<br />

290 Information on home <strong>and</strong> non-home equity or on the Dun & Bradstreet credit rating was not available in the<br />

1993 survey.<br />

NERA Economic Consulting 215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!