21.07.2013 Views

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

The State of Minority- and Women- Owned ... - Cleveland.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anecdotal Evidence <strong>of</strong> Disparities in the City <strong>of</strong> Clevel<strong>and</strong>’s Market Area<br />

3. Experiences <strong>of</strong> Disparate Treatment in Business Dealings<br />

<strong>The</strong> survey included questions about instances <strong>of</strong> disparate treatment based on race <strong>and</strong>/or sex<br />

experienced in various business dealings during the past five years. As shown in the last row <strong>of</strong><br />

Table 8.3, 39 percent <strong>of</strong> M/WBE firms said they had experienced at least one instance <strong>of</strong><br />

disparate treatment in one or more areas <strong>of</strong> business dealings identified on the survey. Reports <strong>of</strong><br />

disparate treatment were substantially <strong>and</strong> statistically significantly higher for minorities <strong>and</strong><br />

nonminority women than for nonminority males, casting doubt on claims <strong>of</strong> widespread “reverse<br />

discrimination.” Reports were highest among African Americans, with an overall rate over 67<br />

percent, <strong>and</strong> Hispanics, with an overall rate <strong>of</strong> almost 44 percent. Similar patterns were observed<br />

when the results were disaggregated by procurement category.<br />

<strong>The</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> Table 8.3 shows results for each <strong>of</strong> 14 distinct types <strong>of</strong> disparate treatment<br />

inquired about in the survey. In all categories, the difference in reported amounts <strong>of</strong> disparate<br />

treatment between M/WBEs <strong>and</strong> non-M/WBEs is substantial. In having to perform inappropriate<br />

or extra work not required <strong>of</strong> non-M/WBEs, M/WBE firms reported disparate treatment more<br />

than seven times as frequently as non-M/WBEs. In hiring workers from union hiring halls, the<br />

ratio was almost five times higher. In applying for <strong>com</strong>mercial loans, 309 applying for surety<br />

bonds, applying for <strong>com</strong>mercial or pr<strong>of</strong>essional insurance, obtaining price quotes from suppliers,<br />

<strong>and</strong> having to meet quality, inspection, or performance st<strong>and</strong>ards not required <strong>of</strong> <strong>com</strong>parable<br />

non-M/WBEs, the ratio was more than three times higher. Even where differences are smallest,<br />

M/WBEs report being discriminated against roughly 1.2 to 2.4 times more frequently as non-<br />

M/WBEs.<br />

Evidence <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> public sector M/WBE programs is seen in that the smallest differences<br />

between M/WBEs <strong>and</strong> non-M/WBEs appear in the categories <strong>of</strong> working or attempting to work<br />

on public sector prime contracts (1.25 times higher) <strong>and</strong> subcontracts (1.2 times higher).<br />

Comparable ratios on private sector prime contracts <strong>and</strong> private sector subcontracts were 2.2<br />

times <strong>and</strong> 1.9 times higher, respectively.<br />

309 Discrimination in access to <strong>com</strong>mercial credit <strong>and</strong> capital is the most widely <strong>and</strong> <strong>com</strong>monly cited problem facing<br />

minority-owned firms. See Chapter VI for an extensive discussion <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>and</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> the evidence<br />

behind this phenomenon.<br />

NERA Economic Consulting 270

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!