Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
136 B.A.N.Z. ANTARCTIC RESEARCH EXPEDITION<br />
Podetia cylindrical at first, wholly scyphiferous, cup not dilated, bottom moderately concave,<br />
margin smooth and slightly brownish ; then dilating gradually upward, pellucid, areolate corticate,<br />
rapidly passing into farinose sorediose above; then the cup dilates rapidly above, becoming about<br />
20 mm. tall, cups up to 12 mm. broad, occasionally proliferating from the margins of the cup, or<br />
more commonly from the side of the old podetjum, and wholly farinose sorediose; cortex absent,<br />
algal layer breaking up into spherical colonies, 20-35p in diameter, corticated by one or two layers<br />
of fungal hyphae and breaking away as soredia, leaving a few loosely woven, medullary hyphae;<br />
chondroid axis 110-150~ thiclr, of densely woven, thick-walled, conglutinate hyphae.<br />
Apothecia immature, about 0-2 mm. in diameter, sessile in the margin of the cup, very coilvex ;<br />
parathecium not devkloped; hypothecium obconic, about 120p tall, of vertieal hyphae radiating<br />
from what appears to be the remains of an old spermogonium, of slender, thin-walled, slightly<br />
brownish hyphae which are continued above as paraphyses with broad elavate tips, cutting off<br />
thick-walled, subspherical cells about 4~ in diameter ; forming a dark brown epithecium about 15,~<br />
thick ; asci not developed.<br />
In the case of the apparent proliferatioil from the sides of the podetia, it is not clear whether<br />
the podetia arise from a soredium developing in situ, or by true proliferation, as the base consists<br />
of a contorted squamule with several other, subascendant, almost isidioid squamules nearly<br />
contiguous with that bearing the podetium.<br />
Our plants seem to belong in the species, or group of species from the southern hemisphere,<br />
related to ClaclolLia jimbriata and C. pityrea;. Fortunately the cofiection is abundant, with many<br />
different stages of development. If one had only the young podetia, it might be referred to<br />
C. pyzkiata v. pocillum, in spite of the thinner cortex and pellucid wall of the podetium where<br />
it is visible between the areolae. If one has an old, somewhat lacerate podetium, proliferating,<br />
with squamules about the base of the proliferation, it might be referred to C. squu.mosa as understood<br />
by Miiller-Argau. If one has a long, slender podetium before the cup begins to expand, it<br />
might be considered C. acuminata in the sense of Crombie. Certain broadly expanded podetia<br />
before they have proliferated might be taken for C. ji?abria,ta var. cho~droidea Vainio. It may<br />
be related to C. ccdspersa Mont. & v. d. Bosch, of which I have seen no authentic material.<br />
Kerguelen : Long Island, Royal Sound, B.A.N.Z.A.R.E. B168-1, B169-1 (535).<br />
STER~CAUMN ( Schreber 1 Hoffmann.<br />
Stcreocaulm (Schreber) Hoffmann, Deutschl. Fl., 128; 1796 non Schrader, Spicil. Flor. Germ., 1,<br />
113 ; 1794.<br />
Lichen. sect. Stereocadon Schreber in Linn6, Gen, P1. ed., 8, 2, 768 ; 1791 ; Acharius, K. Vetenslr<br />
Akad. Nya Handl., 1794,258 ; 1794.<br />
Type species: S. pawhale (L.) Hoffm. The early nomenclature of this genus is confusecl.<br />
Proposed by Schreber as a subgenus without citing any species belonging to it, it was first uscd<br />
by Schrader for S. corallinum (Gmel.) Schrader, a species now considered as belonging in Pertusaria.<br />
Since this use antedates Pertusaria, to adopt it would invalidate that name which has been<br />
in general use for more than a eentury and one would have to use Ccwalloides [Dillenius] Hoffmann,<br />
Descr. ~dumbr. P1. Lich., 1,23; 1789, for the group now known as Stereocaulon. Acharius<br />
(1794) included a species (and its variety) of Sphaerophorus, "Lichen. paschalis, L. ramulosus<br />
Swartz, etc." in his Stereocau!ole but nowhere malres formal combinations. In his Lichenographia<br />
Suecicae Prodomus, 208-209; 1798, he treats the group as a subgenus of Lichen but excludes<br />
Sphaerophorus and treats three species acd three doutbful ones. One of his three species is now