31.08.2013 Views

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tahle 1. Macoma <strong>and</strong> Scrobicularia. Siphon length (cm) <strong>and</strong><br />

siphon weight (mg AFDW per mm) as a function of shell lengUi<br />

(cm). The lengih of tin- siphon was unstretched <strong>and</strong> measured ili<br />

reclly alter dissection. Macoma(n = 27SO. range: 4 to 21 mm) were<br />

collected in April <strong>and</strong> May I 9X6 <strong>and</strong> Scrobicularia < n = 73. range: 6<br />

to 35 mm) in June 1992. The regressions, w Inch are both highly sig-<br />

tiilicaiil. were calculated over the means pei mm class, weighed lor<br />

the number of cases.<br />

Siphon length (IV cm) IIS ,1 turn lion oj shell length (X; mini<br />

Mm imiii balthica<br />

Scrobicularia plana<br />

V= 1.37 ,\ + 0.24<br />

Y = 6.2I X-4.22<br />

FEEDING RADIUS. BURYING DEPTH AND SIPHON SIZE<br />

r=0.90<br />

r = 0.92<br />

Siphon weight t Y: mg . m im ./ function of shell length IX: mm)<br />

Macoma balthica<br />

Scrobicularia plana<br />

Y = 0.145 X- 0.009 r = 0.95<br />

Y = 0.386 X- 0.217 r = 0.97<br />

With Scrobicularia stored in the freezer, the unstretched<br />

siphon length was 2 to 10 cm. about five<br />

times longer than in boiled siphons. Siphon weight<br />

was again highly correlated with siphon length<br />

(r = +0.58) in these 34 Scrobicularia. The correlation<br />

was also significant when siphon weight was plotted<br />

againsi siphon width, measured at the top (r = +0.44),<br />

halfway along the siphon (r = +0.50) <strong>and</strong> at the base<br />

(r = +0.34). When siphon weight was plotted against<br />

the product of siphon length <strong>and</strong> the square of siphon<br />

width, the correlation was even higher, r = +0.70.<br />

Siphon weight is thus clearly a function of the combined<br />

effect of siphon length <strong>and</strong> siphon width. No relationship<br />

was found between siphon weight <strong>and</strong> shell<br />

si/e (r = +0.10). nor between siphon length <strong>and</strong> shell<br />

size (r = -0.08). The correlation between shell size <strong>and</strong><br />

siphon width was non-significant with the width at the<br />

top (r = +0.15) or halfway up the siphon (r = +0.14),<br />

but highly significant with the width measured al the<br />

base (r =+0.56).<br />

Macoma (15 mm long) that were held in vertical<br />

test tubes with sea water exten<strong>de</strong>d <strong>their</strong> siphons by I to<br />

8 cm. We found for these 26 animals no significant relationship<br />

between the total siphon weight, which varied<br />

between 0.5 <strong>and</strong> 2.1 mg. <strong>and</strong> the maximal length of<br />

the exten<strong>de</strong>d siphon. The siphons weighed 1.4 mg. on<br />

average. The maximal extension of the siphon was.<br />

120<br />

Scrobicularia plana<br />

Macoma balthica<br />

2.2 n=ll 0.6 n=2148<br />

— 2.0 • vtf O^,<br />

E • / 0.5 y^o<br />

£ --8 / • /<br />

o><br />

c<br />

01<br />

o /• 0.4 _ /<br />

CL / I<br />

S 1.4 / 1<br />

o<br />

1 2<br />

10<br />

•<br />

i i i<br />

0.3<br />

siphon weight (mg) siphon weight (mg)<br />

Fig. 6. I engih i cm i ot the inhalant siphon of Scrobicularia (35 mm)<br />

<strong>and</strong> .Wm iima 115 mm) after disscuion as a lunciion of the siphon<br />

weight: from data given in Tahle I: dala pooled per siphon weight<br />

category. Lines drawn by eye.<br />

also on average, 4.5 cm. so 1 cm siphon length correspon<strong>de</strong>d<br />

with about 0.31 mg siphon tissue.<br />

ln another experiment. Macoma (16 mm long) in<br />

some mm of sea water exten<strong>de</strong>d <strong>their</strong> siphons horizontally.<br />

There was again no relationship between the<br />

length of the exten<strong>de</strong>d siphon <strong>and</strong> its total weight. On<br />

average. Ihe extension was 3.0 cm (SD =1.1 cm) <strong>and</strong><br />

the total weight 1.28 mg; this gives for an extension of<br />

1 cm a siphon weight of 0.43 mg. or 0.39 mg cm' 1 for<br />

a st<strong>and</strong>ard Macoma of 15 mm. However, the expected<br />

relationship between siphon length <strong>and</strong> siphon weight<br />

was found in this sample of horizontally stretched<br />

siphons when length was plotted against the weight of<br />

only the exten<strong>de</strong>d portion of the siphon (Fig. 7A). As<br />

pari of ihe scatter in die data could be attributed to the<br />

total siphon weight, the relationship is given separately<br />

for total siphon weights of 1. 1.5 <strong>and</strong> 2 mg. If the<br />

siphon were elastic, the weight per cm extension<br />

would <strong>de</strong>crease the more the siphon was stretched.<br />

This is clearly not the case, since the weight per unit<br />

length of external siphon was 0.15 mg cm ' for a total<br />

siphon weighing 1 mg <strong>and</strong> did not increase when the<br />

siphon was stretched by 2 or 7 cm (Fig. 7B). The same<br />

panel shows that with a total siphon weight twice as<br />

greai. the weight per cm levelled off at the higher value<br />

of 0.3 mg cm', also twice as high as in the relatively<br />

lightweight siphons. Since siphon extension is only

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!