31.08.2013 Views

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1000 r<br />

1 II" 1 -<br />

r^Jan'80<br />

PREDICTING SEASONAL AND ANNUAL FLUCTUATIONS IN THE LOCAL EXPLOITION OF DIFFERENT PREY<br />

0.5 1 2 3mg-s-'<br />

10 100 1000<br />

prey weight (mg)<br />

244<br />

Fig. 7. Cerasto<strong>de</strong>rma. Ploi of <strong>de</strong>nsity in in -i againsi avenge llesh<br />

weighl (mg AFDW) for live different cohorts during one t.i three<br />

yean. The hues connect ihe course of the change in <strong>de</strong>nsity <strong>and</strong> average<br />

prey weight for as long as the eolion existed, besed on<br />

monthly samples in ihe Nes area, from August in the year ofsetiement<br />

onwards. In each winter (here was a <strong>de</strong>crease ol the prey<br />

weight. Grey fields indicate the predicted intake rate of Oy-tei<br />

caichers as ihe combined function of pa*y weighl <strong>and</strong> prey <strong>de</strong>nsit]<br />

(based on Fig. 16 in Zwarts t/u/. I996h).<br />

was assumed lhat all Oystercalchers fed on the prey<br />

predicted to yield the highest intake rate. Except for<br />

Macoma <strong>and</strong> Scrobicularia. we assumed that the birds<br />

could prey on only one prey species at a time. As<br />

shown before, the actual choice between these two<br />

species did not matter much for the predicted intake<br />

rate, so that it was hard to reliably predict the optimal<br />

mix. Fortunately, Scrobicularia was absent during the<br />

last four years. For the first four years, il was assumed<br />

that both prey were taken in an equal amount of<br />

biomass<br />

Results<br />

Bird <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

The Oystercatcher was the most common shorebird in<br />

the study area with 8.4 birds ha ', averaged over ihe entire<br />

year, but there was a large variation in the <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

during 8'/, years of counting (Fig. 6A). Hardly any<br />

Oystercatcher fed in the area in 1981 <strong>and</strong> 1982.<br />

Nonetheless, the peak numbers were present each year<br />

in mid-winter <strong>and</strong> the lowest numbers occurred between<br />

mid-March <strong>and</strong> mid-August. No counts were<br />

ma<strong>de</strong> when ice covered the mudflats (Fig. 6B), but<br />

usually no Oystercatchers fed in the study area during<br />

such periods, since mosl birds left the area altogether<br />

<strong>and</strong> those remaining stayed on the roosts. If birds led<br />

on the mudflats during frost periods, they did so outsi<strong>de</strong><br />

the study area on the water's edge near the lowwater<br />

mark, the only place where the substrate was not<br />

frozen.<br />

Oystercatchers <strong>and</strong> Cockles<br />

The intake rate of Oystercatchers <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>d closely on<br />

the weight of the prey taken <strong>and</strong>. to a lesser <strong>de</strong>gree, on<br />

ihe <strong>de</strong>nsit) in which these prey occurred. Figure 7 <strong>de</strong>-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!