31.08.2013 Views

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

too (Fig. 11 A). In<strong>de</strong>ed, the average size of N|milx. <strong>de</strong>creased<br />

1 cm from July to winter. No significant trend<br />

was found in N k: on average its size remained Ihe<br />

same during die course of the year (Fig. I IO.<br />

Substrate temperature had no effect on (he feeding<br />

rale of Curlews in summer or autumn, when the temperature<br />

lay between 2 <strong>and</strong> 24 °C. This seems to be different<br />

for February <strong>and</strong> March, because temperature<br />

has a highly significant effect on feeding rate, which<br />

increased from 0.6 to 1.8 prey min ' wilh a rise in mud<br />

temperature from 1 to 8 °C. However, this effect was<br />

not found within any single day. so it is unlikely thai<br />

substrate temperature has a direct short-term effect on<br />

prev availability.<br />

About 25'. of Nprote broke during summer <strong>and</strong><br />

more than 50 r /t in winter (Fig. 12A). The most likely<br />

explanation is the greater burrow <strong>de</strong>pth in winter, making<br />

ii morediffic'uli for a Curlew to grasp the prey well.<br />

The increase in h<strong>and</strong>ling time in the same period from<br />

15 to 20 s can partly be attributed to the increased proportion<br />

of broken worms (Fig. 12B). but die effect is<br />

still present for intact worms, indicating lhat <strong>de</strong>pth itself<br />

causes an increase in h<strong>and</strong>ling time.<br />

In contrast to N^,,,,,... the proportion of broken Np^...<br />

<strong>de</strong>creased from 25% in summer to 10% in winter (Fig.<br />

12A). Also, the average h<strong>and</strong>ling time <strong>de</strong>clined from 8<br />

s in July to 5 s in October, remaining at the same level<br />

afterwards (Fig. 12B). This <strong>de</strong>cline cannot be explained<br />

by a <strong>de</strong>crease in broken worms, since the trend<br />

was the same for unbroken worms. The <strong>de</strong>crease in<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ling time as well as in the proportion of broken<br />

N|Vli indicates th-.it Nereis became easier to capture<br />

later in the season, which is the consequence ol a sea<br />

sunal shift in the feeding behaviour of Nereis, as will<br />

be discussed later.<br />

Although we could not observe whether Np,.^ was<br />

laken from the entrance of the burrow or from the surface,<br />

we are convinced that all prey of the N_^ type in<br />

winter are taken from the surface whereas this is probably<br />

not always the ease in summer. The h<strong>and</strong>ling time<br />

is reduced lo seizing <strong>and</strong> swallowing if Nereis is laken<br />

from the surface, but if the prey is extracted from the<br />

burrow it has more opportunity to retreat, resulting in a<br />

longer h<strong>and</strong>ling time <strong>and</strong> a higher proportion of broken<br />

worms. Two explanations for both effects are conceivable.<br />

Either the proportion of worms taken from<br />

the surface increases during the season or substrate<br />

VERSATILITY OF CURLEWS FEEDING ON NEREIS<br />

326<br />

J A S O N D J F M<br />

Fig. 12. Numenius arquata (ceding on Nereis diversicolor. A.<br />

Percentage broken N—j (•) <strong>and</strong> NfniK (O) during the course<br />

ol the year. Total is 8749 worms, wilh ai leasl 400 per monlh.<br />

except February in = 136). B. H<strong>and</strong>ling lime (means± SE)of N„.k<br />

(•: R : = 7.2%, p < 0.001: n = 6230) <strong>and</strong> N ^ (O: R" = 0.8%.<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!