31.08.2013 Views

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 - n=!080<br />

5 •<br />

g 4<br />

CP<br />

><br />

i 3<br />

CO<br />

CD<br />

f 2 L<br />

i<br />

0<br />

n=i6M<br />

water above thin moist<br />

surlace water lilm surface<br />

BURROWING AND FEEDING IN NEREIS<br />

^ burrow<br />

^ H surface<br />

Fijj. 11, \ereis diveiMiolnr. Activity in an aquarium in relation to<br />

water level after exposure, based on acliviiv Counts every 1(1 min<br />

In = counts X worms in aquarium I.<br />

tion when the <strong>de</strong>pth of the water column <strong>de</strong>creased, but<br />

we cannot exclu<strong>de</strong> the possibility that the burrow activity<br />

became more visible. The method used to quantify<br />

the activity data in Fig. 11 apparently led to an un<strong>de</strong>restimation<br />

compared with the time-budget study<br />

(Fig. I0A). This does not. however, change the relath e<br />

differences in activity as caused by water level.<br />

Discussion<br />

Burrow <strong>de</strong>pth <strong>and</strong> size<br />

Burrow <strong>de</strong>pth of Nereis increased with size (Figs. 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> 3). However, within each size class there was a<br />

large variation in burrow <strong>de</strong>pth. A part of this variation<br />

can be attributed to body condition: worms with a relatively<br />

heavy body weight have <strong>de</strong>eper burrows than<br />

worms in poor condition (Figs. 5 <strong>and</strong> 6). The difference<br />

in burrow <strong>de</strong>pths of worms living in s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

mud (Figs. 2 to 4) might also be explained by systematic<br />

differences in body condition for worms living in<br />

s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> mud (Fig. 5). There is no reason to assume<br />

that <strong>de</strong>ep burrows cause enhanced body condition, so<br />

the reverse seems more likely: worms with a poor condilion<br />

are apparently not able to dig <strong>and</strong>/or maintain a<br />

<strong>de</strong>ep burrow. In bivalves it was also found that individ­<br />

311<br />

uals with a better body condition increase <strong>their</strong> burying<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth, achieving a <strong>de</strong>crease in <strong>their</strong> predation risk<br />

(Zwarts 1986. Zwarts & Wanink 1989).<br />

Burrow <strong>de</strong>pth <strong>and</strong> predation risk<br />

When ihe tidal cycle is simulated in a laboratory,<br />

worms remain <strong>de</strong>ep in <strong>their</strong> burrows <strong>and</strong> perform no<br />

surface activity during immersion (Va<strong>de</strong>r 1964. this<br />

paper). If ihis is also the case in the field, <strong>de</strong>pth would<br />

<strong>de</strong>termine accessibility to shrimp <strong>and</strong> fish feeding<br />

when the tidal Bats are floo<strong>de</strong>d. Shrimp Crangon cran-<br />

It is necessary ID sil quietly lor many hours lo know how often Rag­<br />

worms come to the surface to feed during the low waler period.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!