31.08.2013 Views

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table I. Annual variation in the biomass of prev species of Knol<br />

Calidris canutus ig AFDW m -'i.n sue N in August of 1977 to 1986.<br />

Average, lowest <strong>and</strong> highesi hiomass are given. RSD: relative st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

<strong>de</strong>viation (SD as percentage of the mean i.<br />

Spei ies Average, g Range, g RSD.%<br />

Macoma 17.22 7.4- 34.5 4(.(.<br />

Cera.sioilenna 20.66 0- 62.3 107.2<br />

Mya 13.20 7ii 23.7 38.6<br />

Si nihil ularia 20.2.1 8.1- 46.3 86.S<br />

Msiilus 1.45 0- 7.9 186.6<br />

Total 73.26 52.X-111.0 26.6<br />

Table 2. Annual variation in the biomass within the range of size<br />

classes harvestable bj Knot Calidris canutus ig AFDW m -: without<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth restriction) al she N in August of 1977 to 1986, Range ol hat<br />

vestable si/e classes are laken from Zwarts & Blomerl (1992). Ai<br />

erage. lowest <strong>and</strong> highest biomass harvestable by Knot are given.<br />

RSD: relative st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>de</strong>viation (SD as percentage of the mean).<br />

Species nge, mm Average, ? Range, % RSD, '.<br />

Macoma 6-16 7.81 3.9-14.9 44.0<br />

Cerasto<strong>de</strong>rma 5-12 1.25 (i 6.6 155.7<br />

Mya 7-17 0.33 0- 1.3 153.4<br />

Si nihil ularia 7-14 0.14 0- 1.4 .'00.0<br />

Mytilus 5-20 0.33 0- 2.6 2377)<br />

Total 9.86 3.9-17.7 45.9<br />

biomass. The biomass of these species did not <strong>de</strong>viate<br />

much, however, from the values found in other, similarly<br />

sheltered areas wilh mixed substrate, situated at<br />

or just above mean sea level (Beukema 1976. Zwarts<br />

1988b).<br />

Knot do not swallow large prey <strong>and</strong> they ignore the<br />

small si/e classes (Zwarts & Blomert 1992). Table 2<br />

gives the range of size classes harvestable bv Knol <strong>and</strong><br />

the corresponding biomass for these size classes at site<br />

N. A comparison of Tables I & 2 reveals that onlv a<br />

small fraction of the total biomass fell within die range<br />

of size classes harvestable by Knot. The exception vv as<br />

Macoma. for which, on average. 449f of ihe total<br />

biomass may be consi<strong>de</strong>red as harvestable by Knot.<br />

VARIATION IN FOOD SUPPLY OF KNOT<br />

292<br />

Moreover, of all the potential prey species, the annual<br />

variation in harvestable biomass is least in Macoma.<br />

The large annual variation in total <strong>food</strong> supply was<br />

caused by the erratic occurrence of summer recruitment<br />

<strong>and</strong> winter mortality (Beukema et al. 1978,<br />

Beukema 1979. 1982. Beukema & Essink 1986, Desprez<br />

«?/ al. 1991, Ducrotoy el al. 1991, Essink et al.<br />

1991. Jones & Park 1991. Obert & Michaelis 1991).<br />

There were also large differences among species in annual<br />

growth rale <strong>and</strong> mortality (Fig. 4). Cerasto<strong>de</strong>rma<br />

grew rapidly but the majority died within two or three<br />

years. There was recruitment in this species during<br />

seven of the ten years, but the only substantial cohort<br />

originated in 1984. No spatfall of any significance occurred<br />

in Scrobicularia during ihe ten years after 1976.<br />

when a strong year class was recruited (see also Essink<br />

et al. 1991). Many of these animals were still alive in<br />

1983 <strong>and</strong> 1984. In Mya as well, there was heavy spatfall<br />

during only one of the ten years, viz. 1979. Recruitment<br />

was variable in Macoma. but the variation<br />

was not as large as in the other species: in six of the ten<br />

years there was recruitment, with a consi<strong>de</strong>rable spatfall<br />

occurring in three of them.<br />

Food of Knot<br />

After the first growing season. Mya reached A si/e of 5<br />

lo 10 mm <strong>and</strong> grew io about 25 mm by the end of <strong>their</strong><br />

-econd summer (Figs. 4 & 5). This means that the majority<br />

of the first-year animals were ignored by Knot<br />

since they were too small <strong>and</strong> therefore unprofitable,<br />

while by the end of the next growing season they had<br />

become too large to be sw allowed. For ihe same reason,<br />

onlv die largest Cerasto<strong>de</strong>rma <strong>and</strong> Msiilus in <strong>their</strong><br />

first year <strong>and</strong> the most slowly growing individuals in<br />

<strong>their</strong> second year were potential prey for Knot. However.<br />

Knot were able to feed on Macoma over a much<br />

longer period, as it took a cohort of ibis species four<br />

years to pass through the 'window of predation" digs.<br />

4&5).<br />

The potential importance of Macoma as prey is also<br />

clear from Fig. 6. which shows the annual variation in<br />

biomass of the si/e classes harvestable by Knot. The<br />

other prey contributed, on average, only 2\ c

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!