waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...
waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...
waders and their estuarine food supplies - Vlaams Instituut voor de ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 6 8 10 12<br />
worm length (cm)<br />
Fig. 16. Numenius arquata feeding on Nereis diversicolor. A. Accessihilnv<br />
of N ^ worms ipercenc of burrows found in the upper<br />
12 cm of the substrate: clav content < 5%) as a funeiioii nl worm<br />
length during late summer i same data as Rg, 2 in F.ssehnk .V Zwarts<br />
1989). B. Relative si/e •ricctiOfl on Np,,^. as a function ot norm<br />
leiigth in late summer, averaged for the 3 years (tame data H Rg.<br />
9C). Lower graph show s the selecliv itv without taking into account<br />
the increase of hiirrnw <strong>de</strong>pihs w nh si/e. Upper graph lakes into account<br />
the relative number of worms found in the upper 12 cm of the<br />
substrate (Fig. 16Aj. C. Proliuhilitv img s ' h<strong>and</strong>ling) of fi?ntK. including<br />
broken worms <strong>and</strong> probing time (cf. Table 3) as a function<br />
ol worm lengih. Iniake rale img s ' Heeding) is indicaled.<br />
VERSATILITY OF CURLEWS FEEDING ON NEREIS<br />
a;<br />
energy gain during h<strong>and</strong>ling is below the general intake<br />
rate during feeding <strong>and</strong> has to take each profitable<br />
prey encountered, i.e. prey for which mg s' 1 h<strong>and</strong>ling<br />
is above mg S"' feeding (Hughes 1980. Krebs et al.<br />
1983).<br />
The profitability ofN-^ <strong>and</strong> Npnihv. incicascs wilh<br />
si/e because although Curlews h<strong>and</strong>le small worms<br />
relatively rapidly, this is not fast enough given the<br />
small amouni s\\ flesh taken (Fig. 10). The prey value<br />
curves, shown in Fig. IOC. concern intact prey only.<br />
The profitability <strong>de</strong>creases 9% for N^<strong>and</strong> 12% for<br />
Nprc.iv '•' broken prey are inclu<strong>de</strong>d <strong>and</strong> again 2N'.' Im<br />
Nprotv '''*'" unsuccessful probing limes are reckoned as<br />
h<strong>and</strong>ling limes (Table 3). The adjusted profitabilities<br />
of NptoN. (Fig. 16C) are Uius 36% below the prey values<br />
for iniaci worms <strong>and</strong> successful probes only (Fig.<br />
IOC).<br />
The iniake rate of male Curlews in late summer <strong>and</strong><br />
autumn was, according to our data. 1.9 mg s' 1 feeding<br />
on average. The profitability of all size classes of Np^<br />
is above this lower limit: the yield of an Npivk of 5 cm<br />
is 5 mg tr', <strong>and</strong> making an extrapolation downward<br />
worms of 4 cm should still be profitable, but in fact<br />
the] .nv not i.iken.<br />
For all si/e classes Nprobc is less profitable than<br />
iNpeck- The rare Np^^. < 6 cm is below the predicted<br />
lower limit <strong>and</strong> 2.2 mg s"' for an Nprobc of 7 cm is just<br />
above the iniake rate of 1.9 mg s~' (Fig. 16C). According<br />
to the simple optimal diet equation there should be<br />
a step change in the selecliv iiy at a worm of C. 7 cm. As<br />
in many other empirical studies (Krebs et al. 1983).<br />
this is not the case - rather there is a gradual increase of<br />
selectivity with size.<br />
One of the assumptions of the classical optimal diet<br />
mo<strong>de</strong>l is that predators know the energy value of all<br />
encountered prey, whereas it is more realistic to suppose<br />
that predators can only estimate prey values <strong>and</strong><br />
thus must make mistakes (Rechten el al. 1983). A<br />
Curlew which <strong>de</strong>tects a worm at the surface must <strong>de</strong>rive<br />
its size from the prey width, since usually only a<br />
part of the body emerges from the burrow. N lhc is extracted<br />
from the substrate. Its si/e can be estimated<br />
only from die width of the entrance of the burrow. Although<br />
we have not quantified the relationship between<br />
width of the corridor <strong>and</strong> worm length, we are<br />
conv inced diat there is a close relationship, also because<br />
body width <strong>and</strong> body length are well correlated