27.12.2013 Views

alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library

alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library

alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX.<br />

APPENDIX I.<br />

GleNDER OF NOUNS.<br />

III dlllall"uaO'cs the distinction of nouns with regard to sex, has been<br />

noted. Ev~ry ~ubstantive denotes either. a male or femnle, .01'. that which<br />

is neither the one r.or the other. This accident, or characteristIc of nouns,<br />

is called thcir Gender. In English, all words denotin~ male an!~aI8, are<br />

considered as masculine; aT! those denoting {tmale Ilmmals, femtntne; and<br />

those denoting things neither TIlale nor female, are termed nwler. "In<br />

t.his dislributiulJ," says Crombie, "we follow the orJer of naturE', and o~r<br />

language iq, ill this respect, both simple and animated." Both in Latin<br />

and Greek, many words denoting things without sex, are ranked as maFCU<br />

line or feminine, wilhout any re~arJ to their meaning, but simply on account<br />

of their terminations. In Frer,ch, all nouns are regarded as either<br />

masculine or feminine, which is a still greater departure from the order<br />

anu simplicity of nature, for which the English language on this point is<br />

distinguished.<br />

Some have objected to the desiO'nation of three genders; they think that<br />

as there are but two sexes, it wo;ld be more philosophical aDd accurate to<br />

say there are only two genders; and to regard all words not belonging to<br />

these, as without gender. A little reflection, I think, will show that this<br />

ol~iectiOD has no just founuation, either in philosophy or fact, aDd that the<br />

change it proposes would be no improvement. It has probnbly arisen<br />

from confounding the word gender, which properly signifies a kind, claaa,<br />

or species, (Lat. gCl!1tS, French gtnre), with the word sex, nnd considering<br />

them a~ synonymous. This, howc\"er, is not the case; these words do not<br />

mean the same thing; and they can not be properly applied in the same<br />

way. 'Ve never S:1Y, "the masculine sex, the feminine sex;" nor" the<br />

male gender, the female gender." In strict propriety of speech, the word<br />

sex can be predicated only of animated beings; the word gender, only of<br />

th~ term by which that being is expressed. The being man, has sex, not<br />

genuer; the 1('ord man, has gender, not sex. Though therefore it is very<br />

absurd to speak of three sexes, yet it may be very proper to speak of three<br />

genders; that is to say, there are three classes (geoders) of nonnR, distinguished<br />

from one another by their relations to sex. One denotes objects<br />

of the male sex, and is called masculine; another denotes objects of the<br />

female sex, and is called feminine; and the third denotes objects neither<br />

male nor female, for which a n!lme more appropriate than the term neutel'<br />

ueed not be desired .<br />

. The term "Common gellde~'," applie? !O such words as parent, child.<br />

frIend, etc., does not constitute a distinct class of word3 which are<br />

neither masculine, nor femininl', 001' neuter, hut i~ uaed for ~onveDience,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!