alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library
alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library
alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
APPENDIX.<br />
APPENDIX I.<br />
GleNDER OF NOUNS.<br />
III dlllall"uaO'cs the distinction of nouns with regard to sex, has been<br />
noted. Ev~ry ~ubstantive denotes either. a male or femnle, .01'. that which<br />
is neither the one r.or the other. This accident, or characteristIc of nouns,<br />
is called thcir Gender. In English, all words denotin~ male an!~aI8, are<br />
considered as masculine; aT! those denoting {tmale Ilmmals, femtntne; and<br />
those denoting things neither TIlale nor female, are termed nwler. "In<br />
t.his dislributiulJ," says Crombie, "we follow the orJer of naturE', and o~r<br />
language iq, ill this respect, both simple and animated." Both in Latin<br />
and Greek, many words denoting things without sex, are ranked as maFCU<br />
line or feminine, wilhout any re~arJ to their meaning, but simply on account<br />
of their terminations. In Frer,ch, all nouns are regarded as either<br />
masculine or feminine, which is a still greater departure from the order<br />
anu simplicity of nature, for which the English language on this point is<br />
distinguished.<br />
Some have objected to the desiO'nation of three genders; they think that<br />
as there are but two sexes, it wo;ld be more philosophical aDd accurate to<br />
say there are only two genders; and to regard all words not belonging to<br />
these, as without gender. A little reflection, I think, will show that this<br />
ol~iectiOD has no just founuation, either in philosophy or fact, aDd that the<br />
change it proposes would be no improvement. It has probnbly arisen<br />
from confounding the word gender, which properly signifies a kind, claaa,<br />
or species, (Lat. gCl!1tS, French gtnre), with the word sex, nnd considering<br />
them a~ synonymous. This, howc\"er, is not the case; these words do not<br />
mean the same thing; and they can not be properly applied in the same<br />
way. 'Ve never S:1Y, "the masculine sex, the feminine sex;" nor" the<br />
male gender, the female gender." In strict propriety of speech, the word<br />
sex can be predicated only of animated beings; the word gender, only of<br />
th~ term by which that being is expressed. The being man, has sex, not<br />
genuer; the 1('ord man, has gender, not sex. Though therefore it is very<br />
absurd to speak of three sexes, yet it may be very proper to speak of three<br />
genders; that is to say, there are three classes (geoders) of nonnR, distinguished<br />
from one another by their relations to sex. One denotes objects<br />
of the male sex, and is called masculine; another denotes objects of the<br />
female sex, and is called feminine; and the third denotes objects neither<br />
male nor female, for which a n!lme more appropriate than the term neutel'<br />
ueed not be desired .<br />
. The term "Common gellde~'," applie? !O such words as parent, child.<br />
frIend, etc., does not constitute a distinct class of word3 which are<br />
neither masculine, nor femininl', 001' neuter, hut i~ uaed for ~onveDience,