alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library
alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library
alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
76 ENGLISH GRAMMAR.<br />
436. The Present subjunctive, in its proper form, according to present<br />
approved usage, has always afuture reference; that is, it denotes a pre·<br />
sent uncertainty or contingency respecting a supposed future action (lr<br />
event; thus, U If he write," is equivalent to, "If he should write," or, "If<br />
he shan write."*<br />
437. Uncertainty or contingency respecting a supposed present action<br />
or state, is expressed by the present indicative used subjunctively; 'IS, "If<br />
he writes as well as he reads, be will succeed."<br />
438. The PRESENT'PERFECT subjunctive is only the same tense of the<br />
indicative, used subjunctively. Such expressions as Ii If she have brougltt<br />
up children," &c. (1 Tim. v. 10), are now obsolete.<br />
439. The Past snbjunctive is used in two senses-<br />
1. It is used to express a past action or state as conditional or contino<br />
gent; as, U If he wrote that letter he deserves credit, and shonld be reo<br />
warded;" "Ifhe was at home, I did not know it."<br />
2. It expresses a supposition with respect to something present, and im·<br />
plies a denial of the thing supposed; as, ., If I had the money now, I would<br />
pay it," implying, I have it not. Used in this way, the verb" fo be" (and<br />
of course the passive voice of transitive verbs) has a separate form in the<br />
singular, but not in the plural, viz, I were, thou wert, he were; for I was,<br />
thou wast, he was; thus, "If my kingdom were of this world, then would<br />
my servants fight," implying, It is not of this world; "0 that thou wert<br />
as my brother," implying, "thou art not."<br />
440. In this way, the Past subjunctive seems to be always used when<br />
the conjunctive term is omitted, and the verb or auxiliary is placed before<br />
its nominative (389); as, .. Had,t thou been here, my brother had not<br />
[would not have (358)] died."<br />
441. When a supposition, &Ce., respecting something past, is expressed<br />
in this way, the Past-perfect must be used; as, "If I had had the money<br />
yesterday, I would have paid it," implying, I had it not; "0 tbat thou<br />
hadst been as my brother," implying" thou wast not."<br />
442. Though the pas I tense, used in this way, refers to a present act or<br />
state, yet, as it has the past form, it should, in parsing, be called the past<br />
tense.<br />
• From this usagE" some gTammarians regard this as an elliptical form of the<br />
fntnre, or of the past potential, in a future sense, the signs shall or should being<br />
omitted; and some have given it as B future. in the conju"ation of the verb, HoweVPf<br />
plausib10 this may appear, from the present prevailing nsag(>, there can be no<br />
donbt that this, so called, elliptical future was formerly considered, and is cven still<br />
used. as a present subjunctive. It is often used when the time is manifestly pre·<br />
sent, and in such a way that neither shall, nor slwuld, nor any similar term, can be<br />
supplied without changino; the sense; and where the Jlresent usage would require<br />
tho present indicative; thus. "Though the Lord be ps, high," &c -Fs. cxxxVlii. G .<br />
.. If thou be [artl the son of God."-Malth. iv. 3,6. 'That which thou sowest is no$<br />
quickened exce»t it die [dies]."-l Cor. XI'. 36- "Whether he be lis] 1\ sinner or not<br />
I know nol."-John ix. 25, &c.<br />
•