27.12.2013 Views

alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library

alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library

alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76 ENGLISH GRAMMAR.<br />

436. The Present subjunctive, in its proper form, according to present<br />

approved usage, has always afuture reference; that is, it denotes a pre·<br />

sent uncertainty or contingency respecting a supposed future action (lr<br />

event; thus, U If he write," is equivalent to, "If he should write," or, "If<br />

he shan write."*<br />

437. Uncertainty or contingency respecting a supposed present action<br />

or state, is expressed by the present indicative used subjunctively; 'IS, "If<br />

he writes as well as he reads, be will succeed."<br />

438. The PRESENT'PERFECT subjunctive is only the same tense of the<br />

indicative, used subjunctively. Such expressions as Ii If she have brougltt<br />

up children," &c. (1 Tim. v. 10), are now obsolete.<br />

439. The Past snbjunctive is used in two senses-<br />

1. It is used to express a past action or state as conditional or contino<br />

gent; as, U If he wrote that letter he deserves credit, and shonld be reo<br />

warded;" "Ifhe was at home, I did not know it."<br />

2. It expresses a supposition with respect to something present, and im·<br />

plies a denial of the thing supposed; as, ., If I had the money now, I would<br />

pay it," implying, I have it not. Used in this way, the verb" fo be" (and<br />

of course the passive voice of transitive verbs) has a separate form in the<br />

singular, but not in the plural, viz, I were, thou wert, he were; for I was,<br />

thou wast, he was; thus, "If my kingdom were of this world, then would<br />

my servants fight," implying, It is not of this world; "0 that thou wert<br />

as my brother," implying, "thou art not."<br />

440. In this way, the Past subjunctive seems to be always used when<br />

the conjunctive term is omitted, and the verb or auxiliary is placed before<br />

its nominative (389); as, .. Had,t thou been here, my brother had not<br />

[would not have (358)] died."<br />

441. When a supposition, &Ce., respecting something past, is expressed<br />

in this way, the Past-perfect must be used; as, "If I had had the money<br />

yesterday, I would have paid it," implying, I had it not; "0 tbat thou<br />

hadst been as my brother," implying" thou wast not."<br />

442. Though the pas I tense, used in this way, refers to a present act or<br />

state, yet, as it has the past form, it should, in parsing, be called the past<br />

tense.<br />

• From this usagE" some gTammarians regard this as an elliptical form of the<br />

fntnre, or of the past potential, in a future sense, the signs shall or should being<br />

omitted; and some have given it as B future. in the conju"ation of the verb, HoweVPf<br />

plausib10 this may appear, from the present prevailing nsag(>, there can be no<br />

donbt that this, so called, elliptical future was formerly considered, and is cven still<br />

used. as a present subjunctive. It is often used when the time is manifestly pre·<br />

sent, and in such a way that neither shall, nor slwuld, nor any similar term, can be<br />

supplied without changino; the sense; and where the Jlresent usage would require<br />

tho present indicative; thus. "Though the Lord be ps, high," &c -Fs. cxxxVlii. G .<br />

.. If thou be [artl the son of God."-Malth. iv. 3,6. 'That which thou sowest is no$<br />

quickened exce»t it die [dies]."-l Cor. XI'. 36- "Whether he be lis] 1\ sinner or not<br />

I know nol."-John ix. 25, &c.<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!