27.12.2013 Views

alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library

alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library

alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2·18<br />

ENG LISH GRAMMAR.<br />

Thus, 'I saw the man I wnnted to see.' Here, man should be reprcsented<br />

as equivalent to the own ,,110m. .<br />

.. Tbe cause of tbe error in respect to lI'hal, is, tbat t~e a.ntecedent IS<br />

IlPver exprcssc,\ with it, It is not like the ,:or~ who., whICb IS usell u?th<br />

when tbe antecedent is expressed, and wben It IS omItted. The relative<br />

Ih"t, however, was furmerly used in many cases where ~e u~e what, that<br />

is with tbe antecedent omitted. A few examples of thIS Will help uS,to<br />

,,;certain the nature of what; ',r e speak that we do know.'-ElIgI1slt<br />

Biblc.-' I am that I am.'-liJ.<br />

," Who had been seen imagine mot~ thereby,<br />

That wbylome of Hercules bath been told:-Spcnser.<br />

" 'Escbe\ve that wicked is.'-GOll'fr.<br />

'" T, it po~si1,le he should not know what he is, and be that he is.'-Sltaks.<br />

" 'Gather the sequel by that went beforc.'-Ib.<br />

"In the,e examples, that is a relative, and is exac!ly synonY!li0us with<br />

".hat. " .. one would contend, that that stands for Ibclf and. I~S ante.ce·<br />

dent at the snme time. The anteced~nt is omitted because it IS IDdefimte,<br />

or easily supplied."-Butler's Grammar, p. 48.<br />

These rl'lllm \;s appeal' to me just, and conclnsive on tbis point,<br />

APPENDIX IV.<br />

IS as EVER A REL,\TlVE?<br />

Tl>at the word AS should not be considered a relative in any circum·<br />

stances, I think is plain from tbe following considerations:-<br />

1. It bU3 neither the meaning nor the use of U relative, Its office is<br />

simply to connect things compared, and, together with its antecedent<br />

word, to express the idea of equality, likenes." &c., between them; thus,<br />

"James is as tall as his father."-u Your bat is such as mine,"<br />

~. It does not, like a relative, relate to a noun or pronoun before it,<br />

called tbe antecedent, nor stand instead of it, or of any other word, but<br />

is related only to the comparative word, as, Bueh, so, &c., in the preceding<br />

clause. Thus, in the sentence, "As many 3S received him," the second<br />

as relates to the first, and the two convey tbe idea of equality. Again,<br />

"Send such books as you have." Here, as refers not to books, but to sue",<br />

Take away such, and as can not be used.<br />

3. As can never be used as a substitute for another relative pronoun,<br />

nor another relative pronoun as a substitute for it.<br />

4. 10 sentences in which as is said to be a relative, it evidently has the<br />

same meaning and use as those in which it is allowed to be ouly [\ con·<br />

junction. Compare tbe following examples: "As many as five men received<br />

a reward."-u As many as received bim,"-" As many a.~ they can<br />

give." In all these, the phrase " as many as" menns, anel is felt to mean<br />

th~ san;re thi~g-equality of number. There .mely, then, caD be no pro~<br />

prlct,Y Ill. callJng the second as a conjunction in the first sentence, flnll a<br />

relatIve In the other two. Tbe same thing will be evident if we chan"e<br />

the antecedent word. Thus," Such books as tbese are useful."-" Slt~"<br />

books as are useful."-" Such books as you can give."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!