alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library
alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library
alytical practical grammar - Toronto Public Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2·18<br />
ENG LISH GRAMMAR.<br />
Thus, 'I saw the man I wnnted to see.' Here, man should be reprcsented<br />
as equivalent to the own ,,110m. .<br />
.. Tbe cause of tbe error in respect to lI'hal, is, tbat t~e a.ntecedent IS<br />
IlPver exprcssc,\ with it, It is not like the ,:or~ who., whICb IS usell u?th<br />
when tbe antecedent is expressed, and wben It IS omItted. The relative<br />
Ih"t, however, was furmerly used in many cases where ~e u~e what, that<br />
is with tbe antecedent omitted. A few examples of thIS Will help uS,to<br />
,,;certain the nature of what; ',r e speak that we do know.'-ElIgI1slt<br />
Biblc.-' I am that I am.'-liJ.<br />
," Who had been seen imagine mot~ thereby,<br />
That wbylome of Hercules bath been told:-Spcnser.<br />
" 'Escbe\ve that wicked is.'-GOll'fr.<br />
'" T, it po~si1,le he should not know what he is, and be that he is.'-Sltaks.<br />
" 'Gather the sequel by that went beforc.'-Ib.<br />
"In the,e examples, that is a relative, and is exac!ly synonY!li0us with<br />
".hat. " .. one would contend, that that stands for Ibclf and. I~S ante.ce·<br />
dent at the snme time. The anteced~nt is omitted because it IS IDdefimte,<br />
or easily supplied."-Butler's Grammar, p. 48.<br />
These rl'lllm \;s appeal' to me just, and conclnsive on tbis point,<br />
APPENDIX IV.<br />
IS as EVER A REL,\TlVE?<br />
Tl>at the word AS should not be considered a relative in any circum·<br />
stances, I think is plain from tbe following considerations:-<br />
1. It bU3 neither the meaning nor the use of U relative, Its office is<br />
simply to connect things compared, and, together with its antecedent<br />
word, to express the idea of equality, likenes." &c., between them; thus,<br />
"James is as tall as his father."-u Your bat is such as mine,"<br />
~. It does not, like a relative, relate to a noun or pronoun before it,<br />
called tbe antecedent, nor stand instead of it, or of any other word, but<br />
is related only to the comparative word, as, Bueh, so, &c., in the preceding<br />
clause. Thus, in the sentence, "As many 3S received him," the second<br />
as relates to the first, and the two convey tbe idea of equality. Again,<br />
"Send such books as you have." Here, as refers not to books, but to sue",<br />
Take away such, and as can not be used.<br />
3. As can never be used as a substitute for another relative pronoun,<br />
nor another relative pronoun as a substitute for it.<br />
4. 10 sentences in which as is said to be a relative, it evidently has the<br />
same meaning and use as those in which it is allowed to be ouly [\ con·<br />
junction. Compare tbe following examples: "As many as five men received<br />
a reward."-u As many as received bim,"-" As many a.~ they can<br />
give." In all these, the phrase " as many as" menns, anel is felt to mean<br />
th~ san;re thi~g-equality of number. There .mely, then, caD be no pro~<br />
prlct,Y Ill. callJng the second as a conjunction in the first sentence, flnll a<br />
relatIve In the other two. Tbe same thing will be evident if we chan"e<br />
the antecedent word. Thus," Such books as tbese are useful."-" Slt~"<br />
books as are useful."-" Such books as you can give."