You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
fungus remained restricted to the underground<br />
parts of plants not showing wilt symptoms. Two<br />
distinct types of symptoms-wilting with and<br />
wilting without a necrotic band on the stem -<br />
were observed.<br />
Our observations of the past 3 years at<br />
1CRISAT Center indicate that the appearance of<br />
wilt symptoms increases rapidly from November<br />
onwards. We have started studies of the yield loss<br />
in relation to time of wilting, and preliminary<br />
results show a progressive decline in losses with<br />
symptoms appearing in successively later stages<br />
of pod formation and development. Surveys of<br />
disease incidence may tend to overestimate yield<br />
losses if seed production on diseased plants is<br />
ignored.<br />
Sterility Mosaic<br />
The causal agent of this disease has not yet been<br />
identified. We have been unable to transmit the<br />
disease either by mechanical transmission or by<br />
grafting. In the case of diseases caused by a<br />
mycoplasma-like organism, treatment with tetracycline<br />
has been found to give remission of<br />
symptoms. Tetracycline applications, made in<br />
several ways, had no effect on symptoms of<br />
plants infected with sterility mosaic. Electron<br />
microscope observations to date have not revealed<br />
virus or mycoplasma-like drganisms.<br />
Although the organism has not been identified,<br />
the vector has been known for several<br />
years. Our studies have shown that a minimum<br />
30-minute inoculation-access period was required<br />
for transmission by the mite (Aceria<br />
cajani). A single mite can transmit the causal<br />
agent.<br />
Although infected plants are usually sterile,<br />
seed is sometimes produced and we have grown<br />
several thousand seeds from diseased plants. In<br />
no case has sterility mosaic been transmitted<br />
through the seed; we consider that the causal<br />
agent is not seed-borne.<br />
Disease Surveys<br />
Surveys are being made each year to assess losses<br />
in farmers' fields. This year the central and<br />
western districts of Maharashtra, not included in<br />
our previous survey, and the states of Karnataka<br />
and Tamil Nadu were surveyed. Wilt and sterility<br />
mosaic were found to be the most important<br />
diseases, with a very low incidence of root rot and<br />
leaf diseases observed. The relative importance<br />
of sterility mosaic increased in areas further<br />
south (Table 31).<br />
Table 31. Observations of wilt and sterility<br />
mosaic in farmers' pigeonpea fields in<br />
three states of India, 1976.<br />
State<br />
Maharashtra (western &<br />
central districts)<br />
Karnataka<br />
Tamil Nadu<br />
Pest Surveys<br />
Wilt<br />
Sterility<br />
mosaic<br />
Range Mean Range Mean<br />
— ( % ) — — ( % ) —<br />
0-38 7.6 - 3.9<br />
0-17 1.1 0-95 9.7<br />
0-65 1.4 0-93 12.8<br />
The relative importance of various insect pests<br />
on pigeonpea was recorded by surveying and<br />
sample collection in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu,<br />
Maharashtra (Akola and Sholapur districts),<br />
Bihar, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh.<br />
The borer damage ranged from 3 to 84<br />
percent. Severe pod damage was recorded in<br />
southern states of India (Table 32).<br />
H. armigera was found to be the major cause<br />
of loss in pigeonpea but Exelastis atomosa Wals.<br />
and Maruca testulalis Geyr. were also common<br />
as pod borers.<br />
N u t r i t i o n a l Quality<br />
One of our objectives is to improve the nutritional<br />
quality of pigeonpea. We recognize that<br />
the first priority is to increase production of<br />
pulses, so have not included nutritional factors as<br />
selection criteria in the breeding program. Emphasis<br />
to date has been on screening the germ-<br />
90