14.04.2014 Views

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Relationship Among Plant Type,<br />

Population, and Planting Pattern<br />

Farmers' cultivars and landraces of millet include<br />

a wide variety of plant types and are grown<br />

in a wide range of planting geometries and plant<br />

populations. We have initiated studies to determine<br />

if there are interactions among plant<br />

type and planting system; if so, they might be<br />

important in variety selection and testing. In one<br />

such study three cultivars, of contrasting height<br />

and tillering habit, were grown at a range of plant<br />

populations from 3 to 25 plants per square meter<br />

in wide rows, narrow rows, and with all plants<br />

equally spaced.<br />

Population seemed to have no effect on grain<br />

yields, as all genotypes demonstrated a remarkable<br />

ability to adjust to changing crop competition.<br />

Individual plant yields increased sixfold<br />

as population declined from 25 plants/m 2 to 3<br />

plants/m 2 . The yield per plant was unaffected by<br />

planting pattern at high populations, but was less<br />

in the equidistant planting at the low populations.<br />

These results suggest that population<br />

per se, over a broad range, is not a determinant of<br />

millet yields, at least where fertility is adequate.<br />

Planting pattern, in contrast, had a highly<br />

significant effect on yield, which was independent<br />

of both genotype and of plant population. Grain<br />

yields were significantly different in the order of<br />

wide rows > narrow rows > equidistant planting<br />

(Fig 24). The yield differences were due to<br />

increases in dry weight of individual tillers, and<br />

to leaf area, grain number, and grain yield (tiller<br />

numbers per unit area were constant), emphasizing<br />

the role of tiller productivity in maximizing<br />

yield.<br />

These studies are now being expanded to<br />

include hill-planting systems, various fertility<br />

levels, and a wider range of cultivars.<br />

Millet Genotype Evaluation<br />

Analysis was completed on the large-scale experiment<br />

of 1976 in which relationships between<br />

yield, yield components, and length of the major<br />

growth stages were evaluated. Results were analyzed<br />

separately for the entire set of 50 genotypes,<br />

as well as for smaller subsets representing<br />

the high-tillering Indian hybrid type and the<br />

lower-tillering West African type. Differences in<br />

grain yield between the two subgroups were not<br />

statistically significant, but there were significant<br />

differences in tiller number per plant, seed number<br />

per plant, and harvest index (Indian types<br />

were superior); and in grain number per panicle<br />

and length of the GS 2 stage (West African types<br />

were superior).<br />

The relative contributions of different yield<br />

components in each group were assessed in a<br />

multiple linear regression model of yield on<br />

panicle number per plant, grain number per<br />

panicle, and grain size (100-seed weight). Over the<br />

entire set, seed number and grain size accounted<br />

fdr 45 and 42 percent, respectively, of the<br />

variation in yield, with panicle number account-<br />

3 500<br />

3 000<br />

2 500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

Equidistant<br />

37.5-cm<br />

row<br />

Seeding configuration<br />

cv 700250<br />

cv HB 3<br />

cv K 599<br />

L.S.D.<br />

(0.05)<br />

75-cm<br />

row<br />

Figure 24. Grain yield of three pearl millet cultivars<br />

as affected by geometry of<br />

planting. Mean data from a series of<br />

five planting populations ranging from<br />

3 to 25 plants/m 2 .<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!