Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
100-secd weight<br />
Pods per plant<br />
Y i e l d per plant<br />
irrigated<br />
non irrigated<br />
irrigated<br />
nonirrigated<br />
irrigated<br />
nonirrigated<br />
D e f o l i a t i o n (%)<br />
L.S.D.<br />
(0.05),<br />
L.S.D.<br />
(0.05)<br />
L.S.D.<br />
(0.05)<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
Figure 38. Effect of different degrees of defoliation<br />
throughout the reproductive<br />
phase on yield and yield components of<br />
chickpea cv 850-3/27 and Annigeri<br />
(mean values shown) with and without<br />
irrigation.<br />
slightly by the treatments. Similar results with cv<br />
JG-62 were obtained in a separate experiment.<br />
These results suggest that leaf area was limiting<br />
yield. This conclusion contrasts with the<br />
results obtained this year in similar experiments<br />
with pigeonpea (see p 89 of this report), and also<br />
with results obtained last year (1975-1976) with<br />
chickpea, when we found that up to 50 percent of<br />
leaves could be removed without affecting the<br />
yield significantly. Last year the experiments<br />
were conducted with plants which were planted<br />
late. It seems possible that the discrepancy<br />
between the two sets of results may be explained<br />
in terms of the effects of moisture and/or heat<br />
stresses to which late-planted plants would be<br />
more exposed.<br />
Effects of flower removal. This year in experiments<br />
with early sown plants at ICRISAT Center<br />
we found that all the flowers could be<br />
removed from the plants for up to 4 weeks after<br />
onset of flowering without causing a decline in<br />
yield, if the plants were irrigated. Nonirrigated<br />
plants had a significantly reduced ability to<br />
compensate for flower removal. Both irrigated<br />
and nonirrigated plants were able to compensate<br />
more or less completely for the removal of up to<br />
50 percent of the flowers throughout the reproductive<br />
period. These compensations involved<br />
both an increase in the number of pod-bearing<br />
nodes per plant and an increase in the number of<br />
seeds per pod.<br />
Last year (1975-1976) we found that flower<br />
removal from late-sown plants resulted in a<br />
decline in yield and also in total dry matter<br />
production. The differences between the 2 years'<br />
results might be because of the greater moisture<br />
and heat stresses to which the later-sown plants<br />
were exposed; these stresses would have limited<br />
their ability to continue growing and setting<br />
pods.<br />
The "double-podded" Character<br />
Although most chickpea cultivars produce a<br />
single flower per node, some produce two flowers<br />
and are capable of setting two pods per node.<br />
Two pods are formed at only some of the nodes,<br />
usually at the more-basal earlier-formed nodes.<br />
We confirmed last year's observations that expression<br />
of this "double-podded" character is<br />
104