14.04.2014 Views

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

100-secd weight<br />

Pods per plant<br />

Y i e l d per plant<br />

irrigated<br />

non irrigated<br />

irrigated<br />

nonirrigated<br />

irrigated<br />

nonirrigated<br />

D e f o l i a t i o n (%)<br />

L.S.D.<br />

(0.05),<br />

L.S.D.<br />

(0.05)<br />

L.S.D.<br />

(0.05)<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Figure 38. Effect of different degrees of defoliation<br />

throughout the reproductive<br />

phase on yield and yield components of<br />

chickpea cv 850-3/27 and Annigeri<br />

(mean values shown) with and without<br />

irrigation.<br />

slightly by the treatments. Similar results with cv<br />

JG-62 were obtained in a separate experiment.<br />

These results suggest that leaf area was limiting<br />

yield. This conclusion contrasts with the<br />

results obtained this year in similar experiments<br />

with pigeonpea (see p 89 of this report), and also<br />

with results obtained last year (1975-1976) with<br />

chickpea, when we found that up to 50 percent of<br />

leaves could be removed without affecting the<br />

yield significantly. Last year the experiments<br />

were conducted with plants which were planted<br />

late. It seems possible that the discrepancy<br />

between the two sets of results may be explained<br />

in terms of the effects of moisture and/or heat<br />

stresses to which late-planted plants would be<br />

more exposed.<br />

Effects of flower removal. This year in experiments<br />

with early sown plants at ICRISAT Center<br />

we found that all the flowers could be<br />

removed from the plants for up to 4 weeks after<br />

onset of flowering without causing a decline in<br />

yield, if the plants were irrigated. Nonirrigated<br />

plants had a significantly reduced ability to<br />

compensate for flower removal. Both irrigated<br />

and nonirrigated plants were able to compensate<br />

more or less completely for the removal of up to<br />

50 percent of the flowers throughout the reproductive<br />

period. These compensations involved<br />

both an increase in the number of pod-bearing<br />

nodes per plant and an increase in the number of<br />

seeds per pod.<br />

Last year (1975-1976) we found that flower<br />

removal from late-sown plants resulted in a<br />

decline in yield and also in total dry matter<br />

production. The differences between the 2 years'<br />

results might be because of the greater moisture<br />

and heat stresses to which the later-sown plants<br />

were exposed; these stresses would have limited<br />

their ability to continue growing and setting<br />

pods.<br />

The "double-podded" Character<br />

Although most chickpea cultivars produce a<br />

single flower per node, some produce two flowers<br />

and are capable of setting two pods per node.<br />

Two pods are formed at only some of the nodes,<br />

usually at the more-basal earlier-formed nodes.<br />

We confirmed last year's observations that expression<br />

of this "double-podded" character is<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!