14.04.2014 Views

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Growth Studies in Controlled<br />

Environments<br />

Our field studies on growth of chickpea are being<br />

supplemented by work in the Plant Environment<br />

Laboratory at Reading University in England.<br />

Under a collaborative project financed by the<br />

Ministry of Overseas Development, R. J. Summerfield<br />

and his colleagues have completed initial<br />

experiments in which several cultivars were<br />

grown to maturity in controlled environments.<br />

With appropriate light sources, the plants closely<br />

resembled those grown in the field in India. At<br />

present an experiment involving different day<br />

and night temperatures and daylengths is in<br />

progress; this has already revealed very marked<br />

and distinct effects of both day and night<br />

temperatures.<br />

Insect Pest D a m a g e<br />

Most of the current chickpea entomology research<br />

is concerned with Heliothis armigera<br />

(Hub.) which is known to be the most damaging<br />

pest of this crop throughout Asia and Africa. In<br />

the 1976-1977 season at ICRISAT Center this<br />

insect was again the only really important pest on<br />

chickpea; during early growth of the plants the<br />

larvae were found feeding on the leaves and later<br />

they destroyed flowers and bored into the green<br />

pods.<br />

In an attempt to quantify the yield loss caused<br />

by these insects on the kabuli and desi types,<br />

plots in which the plants were sprayed with<br />

endosulfan and from which the larger H. armigera<br />

larvae were removed by hand were compared<br />

with nontreated plots. The percentage of<br />

pods damaged, number of pods harvested, and<br />

seed yields are shown in Table 38.<br />

Pest control gave a 55-percent increase in yield<br />

from the kabuli type; most of this clearly resulted<br />

from the increase in number of pods harvested.<br />

In the desi type there was no final reduction in<br />

pod-set in the nonsprayed plots and the small<br />

increase in yield from pest control was associated<br />

with the reduction in pod boring. These results<br />

confirm earlier observations that kabuli types are<br />

Table 38. Comparison of pod damage and yield<br />

in chickpea cultivars under sprayed<br />

and nonsprayed conditions at<br />

ICRISAT Center, 1976-1977.<br />

Borerdamaged<br />

Pods<br />

pods harvested Yield<br />

(%) (no) (kg/ha)<br />

JG-62 (desi):<br />

Sprayed 1.9 19096 1408<br />

Not sprayed 8.2 20804 1324<br />

L-550 (kabuli):<br />

Sprayed 2.5 12019 972<br />

Not sprayed 10.6 8153 626<br />

more heavily attacked by H. armigera, particularly<br />

during the flowering stage.<br />

Pesticide Residue Analysis<br />

D D T and endrin are the most commonly used<br />

insecticides for H. armigera control on chickpeas,<br />

but both of these chemicals have wellknown<br />

disadvantages. We used endosulfan,<br />

which has fewer disadvantages, but its relatively<br />

high cost will discourage most farmers. Insecticide<br />

use during the flowering and green-pod<br />

stage introduces the possibility of toxic residues<br />

in the harvested seed. Samples of seed from<br />

endosulfan-treated plots were sent to the Tropical<br />

Products Institute in England for toxicresidue<br />

analysis. Endosulfan sulphate levels of<br />

up to 0.34 mg/kg of seed were detected; such a<br />

level may cause acceptance problems.<br />

Screening for Susceptibility<br />

It has been established that kabuli-type chickpeas<br />

are generally more susceptible to H. armigera<br />

attack than are the desi types and there is<br />

some evidence to suggest consistent differences in<br />

susceptibility within those types. This has encouraged<br />

intensification of the work in developing<br />

a screening program for "resistance" to H.<br />

armigera.<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!