Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Growth Studies in Controlled<br />
Environments<br />
Our field studies on growth of chickpea are being<br />
supplemented by work in the Plant Environment<br />
Laboratory at Reading University in England.<br />
Under a collaborative project financed by the<br />
Ministry of Overseas Development, R. J. Summerfield<br />
and his colleagues have completed initial<br />
experiments in which several cultivars were<br />
grown to maturity in controlled environments.<br />
With appropriate light sources, the plants closely<br />
resembled those grown in the field in India. At<br />
present an experiment involving different day<br />
and night temperatures and daylengths is in<br />
progress; this has already revealed very marked<br />
and distinct effects of both day and night<br />
temperatures.<br />
Insect Pest D a m a g e<br />
Most of the current chickpea entomology research<br />
is concerned with Heliothis armigera<br />
(Hub.) which is known to be the most damaging<br />
pest of this crop throughout Asia and Africa. In<br />
the 1976-1977 season at ICRISAT Center this<br />
insect was again the only really important pest on<br />
chickpea; during early growth of the plants the<br />
larvae were found feeding on the leaves and later<br />
they destroyed flowers and bored into the green<br />
pods.<br />
In an attempt to quantify the yield loss caused<br />
by these insects on the kabuli and desi types,<br />
plots in which the plants were sprayed with<br />
endosulfan and from which the larger H. armigera<br />
larvae were removed by hand were compared<br />
with nontreated plots. The percentage of<br />
pods damaged, number of pods harvested, and<br />
seed yields are shown in Table 38.<br />
Pest control gave a 55-percent increase in yield<br />
from the kabuli type; most of this clearly resulted<br />
from the increase in number of pods harvested.<br />
In the desi type there was no final reduction in<br />
pod-set in the nonsprayed plots and the small<br />
increase in yield from pest control was associated<br />
with the reduction in pod boring. These results<br />
confirm earlier observations that kabuli types are<br />
Table 38. Comparison of pod damage and yield<br />
in chickpea cultivars under sprayed<br />
and nonsprayed conditions at<br />
ICRISAT Center, 1976-1977.<br />
Borerdamaged<br />
Pods<br />
pods harvested Yield<br />
(%) (no) (kg/ha)<br />
JG-62 (desi):<br />
Sprayed 1.9 19096 1408<br />
Not sprayed 8.2 20804 1324<br />
L-550 (kabuli):<br />
Sprayed 2.5 12019 972<br />
Not sprayed 10.6 8153 626<br />
more heavily attacked by H. armigera, particularly<br />
during the flowering stage.<br />
Pesticide Residue Analysis<br />
D D T and endrin are the most commonly used<br />
insecticides for H. armigera control on chickpeas,<br />
but both of these chemicals have wellknown<br />
disadvantages. We used endosulfan,<br />
which has fewer disadvantages, but its relatively<br />
high cost will discourage most farmers. Insecticide<br />
use during the flowering and green-pod<br />
stage introduces the possibility of toxic residues<br />
in the harvested seed. Samples of seed from<br />
endosulfan-treated plots were sent to the Tropical<br />
Products Institute in England for toxicresidue<br />
analysis. Endosulfan sulphate levels of<br />
up to 0.34 mg/kg of seed were detected; such a<br />
level may cause acceptance problems.<br />
Screening for Susceptibility<br />
It has been established that kabuli-type chickpeas<br />
are generally more susceptible to H. armigera<br />
attack than are the desi types and there is<br />
some evidence to suggest consistent differences in<br />
susceptibility within those types. This has encouraged<br />
intensification of the work in developing<br />
a screening program for "resistance" to H.<br />
armigera.<br />
107