14.04.2014 Views

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

Chickpea ( p l a n t s / m 2 )<br />

13.3<br />

26.7<br />

40.0<br />

53.3<br />

One row safflower : One row chickpea<br />

genotypes and these were correlated with intercropping<br />

performance. Unfortunately, yields<br />

of pigeonpea and Setaria were poor and no<br />

correlations with these crops were significant.<br />

With sorghum, the best correlations were with<br />

difference in height and difference in maturity.<br />

These effects were substantiated by a yield trial<br />

which examined all intercropping combinations<br />

of four pearl millet genotypes x four sorghum<br />

genotypes (Table 54). For two crops so similar,<br />

the advantages of intercropping were remarkably<br />

high. Nine of the 16 combinations gave<br />

advantages ranging from 10 to 32 percent. The<br />

two highest advantages were from the combinations<br />

of latest sorghum with earliest millet<br />

and earliest sorghum with latest millet. The third<br />

highest advantage was from the tallest sorghum<br />

with shortest millet. But other advantages could<br />

not be explained in terms of height and maturity<br />

differences. It seems likely that there are many<br />

other factors involved, so these crop combinations<br />

will be studied further next season.<br />

0.7<br />

0<br />

One row safflower : T w o rows chickpea<br />

0 5 10 15<br />

Safflower ( p l a n t s / m 3 )<br />

Figure 73. Population effects on saffower/<br />

chickpea intercropping at two<br />

row arrangements on Vertisols at<br />

ICRISAT Center, 1976 (3-point moving<br />

average).<br />

little or no advantage when the planting pattern<br />

was one row safflower to two rows chickpea. The<br />

advantages in alternate rows may have been<br />

partly due to a beneficial effect of shading on the<br />

chickpea, an effect which has been observed in<br />

the chickpea physiology research.<br />

Genotype Evaluation<br />

In cooperation with the pearl millet breeders, 40<br />

pearl millet genotypes were subjected to initial<br />

intercrop screening with pigeonpea, Setaria, and<br />

sorghum. A large number of plant characters<br />

and yield determinants were measured on ail<br />

Three-crop Intercropping<br />

The effects of adding intercrops of Setaria (90<br />

days), groundnut (134 days), or both to pigeonpea<br />

(184 days) were examined on both soil types<br />

(Table 55). The Setaria/pigeonpea combination<br />

gave a large advantage on both soils; groundnut<br />

gave a large advantage on Alfisols, but less on<br />

Vertisols. The three-crop combination gave larger<br />

advantages than the two-crop combination<br />

on Vertisols, suggesting that the different maturity<br />

periods of the three crops allowed some<br />

complementarity in terms of the use of growth<br />

resources over time. However, on Alfisols, the<br />

three-crop combinations gave smaller advantages<br />

than did the two-crop combinations. In<br />

view of the dry period during September, these<br />

data suggest that three-crop intercropping may<br />

be beneficial only if there is sufficient moisture to<br />

support all three crops.<br />

Relay and Sequential Cropping<br />

In 1975-1976, there was good evidence that a<br />

rainy season as well as a postrainy season crop<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!