14.04.2014 Views

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 81.<br />

The BW8 tank partially filled following<br />

intense August storms.<br />

Water-balance Studies<br />

Runoff<br />

In watersheds on deep Vertisols, which were<br />

cropped in the rainy season and cultivated to<br />

graded beds, 7 to 10 percent of the seasonal<br />

rainfall ran off; while under flat-planted conditions<br />

runoff varied from 10 to 17 percent<br />

(Table 65). Runoff from the BW3 B watershed<br />

exceeded that observed from BW1 and BW3 A.<br />

These observations again confirm the hypothesis<br />

that a bed-and-furrow system can be effectively<br />

used to uniformly conserve moisture on the land.<br />

This is also evident from Table 66; in 1973 and<br />

1974, when the BW3 B watershed was cultivated<br />

to a 0.8- and 0.4-percent graded ridge-andfurrow<br />

system, respectively, runoff from this<br />

area was very similar to that on BW1 which has<br />

always been maintained in a 0.6-percent gradedridge<br />

treatment. In 1975 and 1976 when BW3 B<br />

was changed to a 1-percent graded-ridge system<br />

and flat field-bunded conditions, respectively,<br />

runoff was (in relation to BW1) considerably<br />

increased.<br />

Runoff under cropped contour-bunded conditions<br />

(BW6 C/D) was of a magnitude similar to<br />

the bed-and-furrow watersheds; however, in this<br />

situation additional infiltration occurred on only<br />

a small portion of the land and drainage problems<br />

frequently existed due to stagnant water<br />

above the bund. (See Land and Water Management<br />

subprogram.) Runoff on cropped, bedded,<br />

medium deep Vertisols (BW7 B,C,D, and F)<br />

amounted to about 10 percent with somewhat<br />

higher values on steeper (1.0%) slopes.<br />

The largest quantities of runoff were observed<br />

under rainy season fallow, field-bunded conditions;<br />

on BW4 C about one-third of the<br />

seasonal rainfall (and 74% of the 21 Jul and 18,<br />

19 Aug precipitation) ran off. A comparison of<br />

the "fallowed" watersheds BW4 C, BW5 BS and<br />

BW6 B indicates that broad beds in a rainy<br />

season fallow situation affect total runoff to a<br />

similar degree as contour bunds. However, the<br />

disadvantage of inadequate drainage on part of<br />

the land (Fig 82), associated with contour bunds,<br />

does not exist under ridged conditions; planting<br />

can be executed within a few days after rain.<br />

Although this management system is not suitable<br />

for Vertisols at ICR1SAT Center, this finding<br />

may be relevant in those areas where the early<br />

rainy season showers are less dependable and<br />

thus "dry planting" is more risky. Peak runoff<br />

rates observed this year (and also earlier) indicate<br />

that under cropped bedded conditions and under<br />

rainy season fallow, values of 0.05 to 0.1 and 0.1<br />

to 0.15 m 3 /sec per ha, respectively, are obtained.<br />

Except under contour-bunded situations,<br />

runoff on the Alfisols amounted to about 20<br />

percent of the seasonal rainfall (Table 67). On<br />

shallow soils runoff was considerably increased<br />

by beds and furrows (RW1 D); in case runoff is<br />

collected for later re-use, this may be desirable on<br />

light soils as long as erosion is not excessive.<br />

During high-intensity long-duration storms, almost<br />

50 percent of the rainfall was lost under flat<br />

as well as bedded planting. Peak discharge rates<br />

on these soils generally range between 0.15 and<br />

0.20 m 3 /sec per ha.<br />

Erosion<br />

Soil losses measured at watershed outlets are<br />

presented in Table 68. Although the observed<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!