Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In an experiment to determine the effect of plot<br />
size in detecting susceptibility differences between<br />
cultivars, trials with plots of 4.8 and 20.0<br />
m 2 were compared. Results of these trials, in<br />
which 13 cultivars were tested show the smaller<br />
plot size to be at least equal in efficiency in<br />
detecting differences, both in percentage of borer<br />
damage and in yield (Table 39). This was a<br />
welcome result, for it will permit additional<br />
replication without increased demand on seed or<br />
land. The susceptibility rankings of the cultivars<br />
were in good general agreement in the two trials;<br />
C-235 and L-345, both desi types, were the least<br />
susceptible while the kabuli types suffered most<br />
damage.<br />
In a preliminary attempt to screen the germplasm<br />
collection for susceptibility, 8894 lines<br />
were sown in unreplicated small plots, with two<br />
check cultivars alternating after every 20 lines. H.<br />
armigera attacks were scored at the green-pod<br />
stage, and the percentage of damage was recorded<br />
when the pods were harvested. There was<br />
a fertility gradient across the field and H. armigera<br />
was more common in the better growing<br />
areas. Pod damage ranged from 0 to more than<br />
50 percent in the check plots, so the individual<br />
records from the unreplicated germplasm lines<br />
can have little value, except perhaps in indicating<br />
the more obviously susceptible. Of the check<br />
plots, 28 percent of the C-235 (n = 219) and 19.5<br />
percent of the BEG-482 (n = 221) were free from<br />
H. armigera damage, but only 11 percent of the<br />
8 629 germplasm lines harvested had no damage.<br />
This is interpreted as an indication that C-235,<br />
and to a lesser extent BEG-482, are less susceptible<br />
than the majority of the germplasm cultivars.<br />
This was not unexpected, as both checks<br />
are well-adapted desi cultivars that have been<br />
grown generally without pesticide protection.<br />
Although the natural infestation of H. armigera<br />
in the screening trials was augmented by<br />
the release of laboratory-bred moths, infes-<br />
Table 39. Comparison of pod-borer damage and yields of 13 cultivars tested in small (4.8 m 2 ) and large<br />
(20.0 m 2 ) plots in randomized blocks with four replicates.<br />
% Borer damage a Yield<br />
Cultivars Small plot Large plot Small plot Large plot<br />
(arcsin scale) (g/m2) (g/m2)<br />
C-235 4.9 3.4 82.5 118.0<br />
BR-70 4.4 10.6 47.7 68.8<br />
L-345 3.0 2.6 60.4 74.6<br />
L-2937 7.0 6.9 79.8 91.4<br />
850-3/27 18.1 12.6 59.8 139.3<br />
JGC-1 7.5 8.3 76.9 113.0<br />
IC-6037 4.9 6.6 73.5 95.0<br />
RS-11 6.1 7.1 81.0 84.2<br />
NP-34 12.0 8.1 69.4 71.4<br />
P-3090 18.2 16.6 68.5 55.2<br />
NEC-143 13.3 11.0 44.4 79.1<br />
Rabat 13.6 14.5 61.3 72.2<br />
IC-682 9.5 9.3 77.3 86.0<br />
S.E.± 9.33 15.35<br />
c . v . ( % ) 21.5 22.0 27.4 34.8<br />
a percent borer damage, bated on arcsin transformation.<br />
10S