Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
are numerous, only a few develop into mature<br />
pods and the kernel size is considerably smaller.<br />
Typical symptoms were observed in 3 to 4 weeks<br />
on healthy plants grafted with diseased scions.<br />
Using the buffer and antioxidant described earlier,<br />
mechanical transmission was made to several<br />
host plants. Chenopodium quinoa showed<br />
chlorotic local lesions and the infection became<br />
systemic. On soya (Glycine max cv. Bragg),<br />
systemic mosaic mottling occurred. When<br />
mechanically transmitted to groundnuts, the<br />
vein-banding symptom was produced but no<br />
axillary shoot proliferation, stunting, profuse<br />
flowering, or peg formation occurred and the<br />
subsequently formed leaflets were chlorotic and<br />
malformed. Mechanical transmission from C.<br />
quinoa and G. max back to groundnuts also<br />
produced these atypical symptoms. Small quantities<br />
of seed from infected seed remained healthy<br />
when germinated. The results at present indicate<br />
Figure 48. A rust-resistant groundnut cultivar<br />
growing at ICRISA T Center.<br />
that more than one agent may be involved in this<br />
disease. One component is a sap-transmissible<br />
virus. The profuse flowering, pegging, and axillary<br />
shoot formation are similar to symptoms<br />
produced by mycoplasma or Rickettsia-like<br />
organisms.<br />
Priority has been given to the two most<br />
important worldwide foliage fungi of<br />
groundnuts - rust (Puccinia arachidis) and leafspots<br />
(Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidiumpersonatum).<br />
Rust has spread at an alarming<br />
rate over the last few years to all the major<br />
groundnut-producing areas. However, little is<br />
known about its biology, the presence or absence<br />
of physiological races, or its methods of survival.<br />
Infected leaf debris collected in rainy season 1976<br />
and exposed to natural weather conditions was<br />
assessed at weekly intervals for viability of the<br />
uredospores. At the time of collection, germination<br />
was in the region of 70 percent, after one<br />
week this had fallen to 30 percent and in a further<br />
week to 1 percent; after that, uredospores did not<br />
germinate. In the 1976-1977 postrainy season,<br />
the results were similar. Only the uredial stage of<br />
the fungus was found, despite intensive searches<br />
for the telial stage which has been recorded in<br />
South America. None of the 37 weed plants and<br />
11 cultivated plants inoculated with rust produced<br />
symptoms.<br />
To assist the breeding program, a reliable<br />
screening technique for detecting rust resistance<br />
is urgently required. Plants 30 days old were<br />
inoculated with uredospore suspensions and<br />
kept at 100 percent relative humidity at 25 to<br />
30°C for 48 hours before being transferred to<br />
ambient conditions. Abundant uredosori were<br />
produced in 8 to 10 days. This technique will be<br />
standardized to provide a high inoculum source<br />
for field testing populations produced by the<br />
breeders in their rust-resistance breeding<br />
program.<br />
A detached-leaf technique for detecting sources<br />
of resistance is also being investigated. This<br />
technique will have the advantage of testing, with<br />
a known intensity of inoculum under controlled<br />
conditions, large amounts of material in a small<br />
area. During some initial tests, leaves which were<br />
detached 5 days after unfolding were found to be<br />
the most suitable. After detachment, the petioles<br />
were placed in various culture solutions with or<br />
without additives. The most suitable media for<br />
keeping the leaves in good condition were found<br />
124