14.04.2014 Views

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00015.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 22. Transverse section of the leaf lamina<br />

of pearl millet hybrid HB 3 showing<br />

the characteristic bundle sheath cells<br />

of the C4 plant.<br />

cells). Surrounding these are the smaller mesophyll<br />

cells, also containing chloroplasts. Marked<br />

cultivar differences in the concentration of<br />

chloroplasts in the bundle sheath cells were<br />

noted.<br />

Effects of Drought-screening Treatments<br />

on Crop Growth and Yield<br />

In order to learn more about the effects of<br />

artificial stress treatments used in screening for<br />

drought resistance, detailed measurements of<br />

crop growth and yield were carried out on<br />

irrigated and on stress treatments during the hot<br />

dry season. The stress treatments used were a<br />

mid-season stress (from 30 to 64 days after<br />

emergence) and a terminal stress beginning at<br />

flowering (48 days after emergence).<br />

Crop duration was shortened by 10 days and<br />

the total crop growth reduced by about 30<br />

percent in the terminal stress treatment (Fig 23).<br />

The mid-season stress caused a marked reduction<br />

in crop growth during the treatment<br />

period, as well as an apparent depressive effect<br />

on growth rate following termination of stress.<br />

Total dry weight and maximum leaf area index<br />

achieved in this treatment were only approximately<br />

60 percent of those in the control, and<br />

crop maturity was delayed more than 20 days.<br />

Grain yields, similar in both stress treatments,<br />

were approximately 45 percent of those in the<br />

control (Table 20). The way in which yield<br />

reduction occurred, however, differed between<br />

the two stress treatments as different yield components<br />

were affected by the different timing of<br />

the two treatments.<br />

Yield reduction in the terminal stress treatment<br />

occurred because of the failure of the late<br />

tillers to develop (compare the differences in<br />

panicle numbers between this treatment and the<br />

control at 64 days and at maturity, Table 20) and<br />

because of a reduction in size of the grains filled<br />

under stress. Yield reduction in the mid-season<br />

stress treatment was due entirely to a reduction in<br />

the productivity of the average panicle. Tillers<br />

whose development was interrupted during the<br />

stress resumed growth after the stress was terminated<br />

(again compare panicle numbers at 64 days<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

Drought<br />

-period<br />

Drought period<br />

Control<br />

Terminal stress<br />

40 80 120<br />

Days after seedling emergence<br />

L.S.D.<br />

(0.05)<br />

Midseason<br />

stress<br />

Figure 23. Effects of stress treatment on crop<br />

dry-matter accumulation. Arrows indicate<br />

time of application of drought<br />

stress. The mid-season treatment was<br />

relieved on Day 65; the terminal stress<br />

treatment was not relieved, as the crop<br />

had senesced by Day 80.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!