Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 22. Transverse section of the leaf lamina<br />
of pearl millet hybrid HB 3 showing<br />
the characteristic bundle sheath cells<br />
of the C4 plant.<br />
cells). Surrounding these are the smaller mesophyll<br />
cells, also containing chloroplasts. Marked<br />
cultivar differences in the concentration of<br />
chloroplasts in the bundle sheath cells were<br />
noted.<br />
Effects of Drought-screening Treatments<br />
on Crop Growth and Yield<br />
In order to learn more about the effects of<br />
artificial stress treatments used in screening for<br />
drought resistance, detailed measurements of<br />
crop growth and yield were carried out on<br />
irrigated and on stress treatments during the hot<br />
dry season. The stress treatments used were a<br />
mid-season stress (from 30 to 64 days after<br />
emergence) and a terminal stress beginning at<br />
flowering (48 days after emergence).<br />
Crop duration was shortened by 10 days and<br />
the total crop growth reduced by about 30<br />
percent in the terminal stress treatment (Fig 23).<br />
The mid-season stress caused a marked reduction<br />
in crop growth during the treatment<br />
period, as well as an apparent depressive effect<br />
on growth rate following termination of stress.<br />
Total dry weight and maximum leaf area index<br />
achieved in this treatment were only approximately<br />
60 percent of those in the control, and<br />
crop maturity was delayed more than 20 days.<br />
Grain yields, similar in both stress treatments,<br />
were approximately 45 percent of those in the<br />
control (Table 20). The way in which yield<br />
reduction occurred, however, differed between<br />
the two stress treatments as different yield components<br />
were affected by the different timing of<br />
the two treatments.<br />
Yield reduction in the terminal stress treatment<br />
occurred because of the failure of the late<br />
tillers to develop (compare the differences in<br />
panicle numbers between this treatment and the<br />
control at 64 days and at maturity, Table 20) and<br />
because of a reduction in size of the grains filled<br />
under stress. Yield reduction in the mid-season<br />
stress treatment was due entirely to a reduction in<br />
the productivity of the average panicle. Tillers<br />
whose development was interrupted during the<br />
stress resumed growth after the stress was terminated<br />
(again compare panicle numbers at 64 days<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
Drought<br />
-period<br />
Drought period<br />
Control<br />
Terminal stress<br />
40 80 120<br />
Days after seedling emergence<br />
L.S.D.<br />
(0.05)<br />
Midseason<br />
stress<br />
Figure 23. Effects of stress treatment on crop<br />
dry-matter accumulation. Arrows indicate<br />
time of application of drought<br />
stress. The mid-season treatment was<br />
relieved on Day 65; the terminal stress<br />
treatment was not relieved, as the crop<br />
had senesced by Day 80.<br />
61