30.08.2014 Views

Retinal Prosthesis Dissertation - Student Home Pages

Retinal Prosthesis Dissertation - Student Home Pages

Retinal Prosthesis Dissertation - Student Home Pages

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 28 Receptive field example<br />

3.6.3 Commonality of sub retinal and epi retinal approaches<br />

In Carver Meads 1990 invited paper “[200]” which refers to Mahowald’s “Silicon<br />

Retina” [201] a description is given of each node in the retina (photoreceptor) and<br />

the hexagonal resistive network between them. The effect of this network is to<br />

compute a spatially weighted average of photoreceptor inputs meaning the output<br />

from the circuit is the difference between the resistive network and that node. So this<br />

sub retinal approach using photodiodes as receptors replicates the centre surround<br />

processing of the vertebrae retina[202]. This centre surround processing is also used<br />

in epi-retinal approaches by using the particular edge detection method described<br />

below to process the received image from an external camera [40, 111, 200, 201,<br />

203, 204]. The receptive field concept is described by Difference of Gaussians<br />

(DOG) which for the centered two-dimensional case is,<br />

( )<br />

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )<br />

(1)<br />

Where x and y are the pixel co-ordinates, σ (standard deviation); pragmatically the<br />

diameter of the centre, and β (space constant) is the ratio of outer diameter to inner<br />

diameter of the receptive field function. To define the difference of Gaussian (DOG)<br />

i.e. f(x,y,σ)from the above description in image processing terms, that part of the<br />

equation relating to the inner circle i.e. the kernel is defined as g inner (x,y,σ) =<br />

( ) ( )<br />

( ) (2)<br />

65 of 200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!