16.10.2014 Views

literacy for life; EFA global monitoring report, 2006 - Institut de ...

literacy for life; EFA global monitoring report, 2006 - Institut de ...

literacy for life; EFA global monitoring report, 2006 - Institut de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GOOD POLICY, GOOD PRACTICE / 245<br />

will work with UNESCO on <strong>literacy</strong> assessment<br />

and cost and financing analysis <strong>for</strong> <strong>literacy</strong>, <strong>for</strong><br />

which OECD and UNICEF can also be key<br />

partners.<br />

Potentially, this is important work, and<br />

UNESCO’s programme on <strong>literacy</strong> practices<br />

and environments, and <strong>literacy</strong> <strong>for</strong> all is another<br />

valuable resource. If the Literacy Deca<strong>de</strong> can<br />

generate political and technical visibility <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>literacy</strong> internationally, strengthen evi<strong>de</strong>ncebased<br />

research and serve as an advocate <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>literacy</strong> in education sector and poverty strategies,<br />

it will make a signal contribution to putting<br />

<strong>literacy</strong> back into the core of <strong>EFA</strong>.<br />

The second opportunity is provi<strong>de</strong>d by the<br />

UNESCO Literacy Initiative <strong>for</strong> Empowerment<br />

(LIFE) programme (2005–2015), <strong>de</strong>signed to<br />

operate within the framework of the Literacy<br />

Deca<strong>de</strong>. Its primary goal is to empower women<br />

and girls through <strong>literacy</strong> in thirty-four countries<br />

with a recor<strong>de</strong>d <strong>literacy</strong> rate of below 50% or with<br />

more than 10 million people without basic <strong>literacy</strong><br />

skills. This ambitious programme, relying on<br />

advocacy, capacity-building and the promotion of<br />

innovation, will need to be well coordinated within<br />

the framework of national sector policies and will<br />

almost certainly require significant levels of<br />

additional funding if the <strong>de</strong>sired impact is to be<br />

achieved. It is unlikely to be successful as a<br />

standardized mo<strong>de</strong>l but can serve as a framework<br />

<strong>for</strong> working flexibly in individual countries. There<br />

are obvious opportunities to work with the United<br />

Nations Girls’ Education Initiative (UNGEI) as well<br />

as with regional bodies and initiatives, such as the<br />

Association <strong>for</strong> the Development of Education in<br />

Africa (ADEA) and the African Union.<br />

Conclusion<br />

No one questions the goal of the literate<br />

society, but far too many people are <strong>de</strong>nied<br />

the opportunity to contribute and gain from its<br />

benefits. There is sufficient evi<strong>de</strong>nce around<br />

the world – historical and current – to show that<br />

the goal is attainable if the right policies are put<br />

in place, and sufficient national and international<br />

political, public and professional energy and<br />

resources drive the process. The policies are not<br />

an add-on to the Millennium Development Goals<br />

but a necessary if un<strong>de</strong>rstated part of their<br />

achievement. And they lie at the core of <strong>EFA</strong>.<br />

Table 9.11: Trends in major aid-financed <strong>literacy</strong> projects and programmes<br />

Survey Total Bilateral & banks UN agencies<br />

Description of target population 1<br />

Women<br />

Girls<br />

Youth<br />

Children<br />

Adults<br />

School-age<br />

Rural<br />

Out-of-school<br />

Teachers<br />

Poor<br />

Boys<br />

Trainers<br />

Indigenous<br />

Minority<br />

Ministry<br />

Parents<br />

Refugee<br />

Disadvantaged<br />

Regional distribution 2<br />

Arab States<br />

Central Asia<br />

Central and Eastern Europe<br />

East Asia and the Pacific<br />

Latin America and the Caribbean<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

South and West Asia<br />

Multiregional<br />

No data<br />

Type of partner/implementing organization 3<br />

Government<br />

NGO<br />

Government and NGO<br />

NPO<br />

United Nations 4<br />

Others and unknown<br />

65 25 40<br />

36 11 25<br />

35 21 4<br />

33 19 14<br />

23 11 12<br />

17 17 0<br />

15 14 1<br />

12 1 11<br />

9 7 2<br />

8 8 0<br />

6 6 0<br />

6 6 0<br />

5 4 1<br />

4 4 0<br />

3 3 0<br />

2 0 2<br />

2 1 1<br />

2 0 2<br />

19 6 13<br />

3 1 2<br />

8 0 8<br />

65 35 30<br />

36 19 17<br />

93 57 36<br />

43 33 10<br />

27 12 15<br />

4 0 4<br />

92 42 50<br />

99 84 15<br />

14 5 9<br />

5 5 0<br />

59 9 50<br />

29 18 11<br />

1. Derived from counting the frequency of words <strong>de</strong>scribing the characteristics of populations appearing<br />

in project <strong>de</strong>scriptions <strong>for</strong> 208 projects. Some projects had more than one target group.<br />

2. Project countries and regions are categorized by <strong>EFA</strong> region.<br />

3. ‘Government’ = central and local government and government institutions; NGO = local and international<br />

civil society organizations.<br />

4. Of 50 United Nations projects, 48 are UNESCO extrabudgetary programmes, financed by other private,<br />

bilateral or multilateral donors but executed by UNESCO. Some are implemented by government or NGOs.<br />

Source: <strong>EFA</strong> Global Monitoring Report Team.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!