28.10.2014 Views

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.83 SP06 has a neutral effect on impact pathway CC3 (associated with heating, electricity and<br />

waste management resulting <strong>for</strong>m proposed residential and commercial property in<br />

Runnymede), <strong>the</strong> same applies to <strong>the</strong> alternative. This is because any development that<br />

comes <strong>for</strong>ward would need to meet BREEAM standards and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e construction of new<br />

development would not have a negative effect on <strong>the</strong> impact pathway as it would need to<br />

reach <strong>the</strong> minimum standards of construction and it would be required to be energy efficient.<br />

11.84 Having regard to SA, overall, (Appendix 3) <strong>the</strong> preferred policy has a neutral effect on SA<br />

objectives, and <strong>the</strong> alternative has mixed effects. AP06‐A1 has a beneficial effect on RSF 17<br />

RSF objective 17 (to address <strong>the</strong> cause of climate change through reducing emissions of<br />

greenhouse gases), however SP06 has an adverse impact, as SP06‐A1 discusses tourism<br />

recreation and leisure to be accessible by public transport (and reduce <strong>the</strong> need to travel by<br />

car). Overall, <strong>the</strong> SP06 has a neutral effect on SA objectives, and SP06‐A1 has mixed effects.<br />

SP06 is not very different to SP06‐A1, as more hotel provision will be viewed positively, and<br />

existing facilities will be utilised more, making a contribution towards social aspects within<br />

Runnymede.<br />

Policy SP07: Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area<br />

11.85 There is no reasonable alternative to <strong>the</strong> policy, as it provides a tested mechanism to<br />

facilitate development. However, <strong>the</strong> overall impact on <strong>the</strong> receptor is mixed positive with<br />

regard to <strong>the</strong> SEA (Appendix 4)<br />

11.86 No discussion of SA<br />

Policy SP08: Employment Development<br />

11.87 With regard to <strong>the</strong> SEA (Appendix 4) <strong>the</strong> positive mixed impact of SP08 is noted,. The affect<br />

of LP08‐A1 on <strong>the</strong> pathways is generally benign. This is encouraging <strong>for</strong> a policy that<br />

promotes employment growth.<br />

11.88 Having regard to <strong>the</strong> conclusion of SA in Appendix 3, overall, all <strong>the</strong> policy approaches have a<br />

neutral/positive impact. However, <strong>the</strong>re is an adverse affect <strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> alternative SP08‐A1 on<br />

RSF 3 (reducing poverty) , RSF 6 (creating vibrant communities), RSF 9 and 11 (stimulating <strong>the</strong><br />

economy), and RSF 12 (developing a dynamic economy), RSF 13 (maintaining a skilled<br />

work<strong>for</strong>ce), RSF 21 (improving transport), The alternative SP08‐A1 is less acceptable in <strong>the</strong> SA<br />

analysis. The need to accommodate growth will have a consequence <strong>for</strong> all <strong>the</strong> receptors, but<br />

<strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> alternatives is different in a negative way and so <strong>the</strong> SP08 is clearly more<br />

acceptable.<br />

11.89 The preferred approach overall in <strong>the</strong> SA consideration does not have an overall different<br />

impact to <strong>the</strong> alternative but it is more positive.<br />

Policy SP09: Sustainable Transport<br />

11.90 With regard to SEA receptor ER06 (Appendix 4), <strong>the</strong> overall conclusion <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong><br />

policy on climate change is significantly beneficial. SP09 has a significantly beneficial effect on<br />

impact pathway CC1 (traffic on Runnymede’s roads), as <strong>the</strong> policy has a requirement <strong>for</strong><br />

relevant development to contribute where appropriate to new public transport, new<br />

development to be located in accessible locations, and reduce car use, <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> policy’s<br />

impacts on traffic will be significantly reduced.<br />

11.91 SP09 has a significantly beneficial effect on impact pathway CC2 (Greenhouse gases<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> construction and/or maintenance of transport, residential and<br />

commercial assets/networks and o<strong>the</strong>r infrastructure in Runnymede), as contributing<br />

positively to new transport-related infrastructure will reduce greenhouse gases.<br />

11.92 SP09 has a neutral effect on impact pathway CC3 (associated with heating, electricity and<br />

waste management resulting from proposed residential and commercial property in<br />

Runnymede), as SP09 requires <strong>the</strong> location of <strong>the</strong> relevant development to be sustainably<br />

located, and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e reduce energy consumption from vehicles, which are associated with<br />

new residential and commercial development. The combination of indirect benefits on this<br />

impact pathway results in a significantly beneficial effect.<br />

Page | 155 Runnymede BC FINAL <strong>Sustainability</strong> <strong>Appraisal</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – Feb 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!