28.10.2014 Views

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

oundaries. The largest area of historic parks and gardens is represented by Windsor Great<br />

Park partially located within an area to <strong>the</strong> northwest of <strong>the</strong> borough.<br />

14.22 Data from <strong>the</strong> English Heritage’s at Risk Register in 2012 shows that Woburn Farm in<br />

Addlestone, a Grade II listed Historic Park and Garden is at risk and in declining condition.<br />

14.23 Historic parks and gardens are vulnerable to similar pressures as listed structures.<br />

Evolution of Baseline in Absence of <strong>Plan</strong><br />

14.24 Runnymede has a diverse heritage in terms of buildings, archaeology and landscapes.<br />

Situated in <strong>the</strong> densely populated South East, <strong>the</strong> trend in population growth <strong>for</strong> Runnymede<br />

can be expected to continue to increase (as exemplified by <strong>the</strong> latest Census data (2011))<br />

which in turn will result in increased demands <strong>for</strong> housing, employment space, and<br />

supporting infrastructure (e.g. transportation, schools, hospitals and health centres, retail<br />

provision etc). The demand <strong>for</strong> development will place <strong>the</strong> borough’s historic heritage assets<br />

at increased risk of disturbance, damage and irretrievable loss.<br />

14.25 In addition, likely effects will be amplified as a result of changes in <strong>the</strong> UK’s climate, which<br />

may be severe. Those changes include long periods of hot dry wea<strong>the</strong>r during <strong>the</strong> summer<br />

months and increased precipitation during winter periods. Coupled with extreme wea<strong>the</strong>r<br />

events and storminess all having cumulative and synergistic affects on both archaeological<br />

and built heritage assets (see Section 12).<br />

Potential Impact Pathways<br />

14.26 Historic Environment and Archaeology could be affected by several adverse potential<br />

pathways<br />

HE1 Impacts on heritage assets due to land take<br />

14.27 Depending upon where development is located and <strong>the</strong> type of development being<br />

proposed, adverse effects resulting from loss or damage to heritage and archaeological assets<br />

can occur.<br />

E2 Impacts on heritage assets due to inappropriate development in its proximity<br />

14.28 Similarly to HE1 <strong>the</strong> location of development coupled with its type can result in adverse<br />

effects due to siting.<br />

HE3 Impacts on heritage assets due to decreased air quality and related climate change<br />

14.29 The historic built environment can be adversely affected by <strong>the</strong> deposition of atmospheric<br />

pollution caused by carbon base energy use in transport and domestic consumption. The<br />

quality of Runnymede’s air is largely a product of its location and <strong>the</strong> fact that is has both <strong>the</strong><br />

M25 and M3 motorways running through it (see: Section 11).<br />

14.30 Changes in <strong>the</strong> wea<strong>the</strong>r from increased periods of dry wea<strong>the</strong>r as well as o<strong>the</strong>r climatic<br />

factors such as flooding have <strong>the</strong> potential to adversely affect heritage assets (see: Section<br />

12).<br />

HE4 Impacts on heritage assets due to disturbance<br />

14.31 Meeting <strong>the</strong> development pressure will lead to increased numbers of residents, employees,<br />

and visitors to heritage assets.<br />

Consideration of Policies and its Alternatives<br />

Policy LP01: Strategy <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Location of Development<br />

14.32 The policy options have an uncertain or neutral impact with regard to <strong>the</strong> SEA (Appendix 4).<br />

With regard to <strong>the</strong> pathways it is noted that LP01 has an adverse impact on HEA4 heritage<br />

disturbance. This recognises that some aspects of our heritage assets may be disturbed. This<br />

signals that consideration will need to be given to detailed submissions to ensure that such<br />

assets are given due consideration.<br />

14.33 Having regard to <strong>the</strong> conclusion of SA in Appendix 3, overall, all <strong>the</strong> policy approaches have a<br />

mixed beneficial impact. It is noted that <strong>the</strong> impact on <strong>the</strong> air quality is adverse (RSF 16),<br />

Page | 184 Runnymede BC FINAL <strong>Sustainability</strong> <strong>Appraisal</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – Feb 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!