28.10.2014 Views

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

agricultural land). The natural landscape of <strong>the</strong> borough is characterised by <strong>the</strong> Thames Basin<br />

Lowland and urban fringe location that maintains a rural appearance including tree and<br />

woodland cover. Its underlying geology is a mixture of light clay or sandy soils, Thames Valley<br />

gravels, and poor sandy, acidic solids in <strong>the</strong> heath and woodlands areas in <strong>the</strong> west of <strong>the</strong><br />

borough.<br />

16.42 Current indicator data suggests that <strong>the</strong> condition of this land and soil receptor is in overall<br />

favourable condition (see: Table 48). There appears to be scope (albeit small) <strong>for</strong><br />

revitalisation of town centres and supporting infrastructure, including transportation, to<br />

affect <strong>the</strong> quality and usability of land and soil, and <strong>the</strong> accessibility of mineral resources.<br />

However, Runnymede has no good quality agricultural land, in this respect <strong>the</strong> ability of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> to directly affect <strong>the</strong> land and soil receptor is low. The borough’s geology<br />

determines it is one of <strong>the</strong> few locations in Surrey <strong>for</strong> mineral resources. Primarily this<br />

consists of sands and gravels, which are considered an important input to <strong>the</strong> Surrey<br />

economy and protected by <strong>the</strong> Surrey Minerals <strong>Plan</strong> (2011).<br />

16.43 The <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> could have brought <strong>for</strong>ward policies to prioritise <strong>the</strong> minimisation of <strong>the</strong><br />

reduction in primary aggregates use in development and supporting infrastructure. Policies<br />

could have been included that requires aggregate developers to adopt a phased approach to<br />

working mineral resource locations and planning <strong>the</strong> eventual integration open space and<br />

leisure activities that provide additional capacity <strong>for</strong> climate change events such as flooding.<br />

The <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> makes no specific references to ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> protection, minimisation of use,<br />

extraction management or site restoration of land and soil resources.<br />

16.44 The pattern of potential impacts policies and <strong>the</strong>ir alternatives’ are expected to have on this<br />

environmental receptor is similar to those displayed in ER01 and ER02. This presents as a<br />

limited number of policies and some alternatives having potentially adverse effects on ER03.<br />

16.45 LP01 is considered to result in a neutral effect on this receptor, in comparison to <strong>the</strong> more<br />

positive mixed effect expected from both alternatives. The assessment team did not expect<br />

any difference between policy or alternatives in terms of SA.<br />

16.46 Policy LP02 and its six alternatives, exhibit a considerable mixture of effects overall <strong>for</strong> this<br />

environmental receptor. This is more pronounced in terms of <strong>the</strong> SEA particularly in respect<br />

of LP02‐A2(b) and LP02‐A3(a). The most severe effect was expected from LP02‐A3(a) which<br />

has been assessed as significantly adverse. This mix and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e differentiation is less<br />

evident in terms of SA where <strong>the</strong> effects range from uncertain to neutral.<br />

16.47 Policy LP08 and its three alternatives, all exhibit similar overall potential effects across <strong>the</strong><br />

range of assessments L2 – L5. In terms of SEA, policy LP08 and its three alternative is assessed<br />

as having <strong>the</strong> potential to result in a neutral effect. In terms of SA, LP08 scores equal to LP08‐<br />

A3 being considered to result in a neutral effect on ER03. Alternatives LP08‐A1 and A2 both<br />

score uncertain. The Level 5 assessment did not differentiate significantly between any of <strong>the</strong><br />

policies.<br />

16.48 Overall, <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>the</strong> accepted policies contained within this <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> on ER03 is<br />

considered to be neutral.<br />

ER04 – Water Resources & Management<br />

16.49 The water resources and management receptor covers effects on <strong>the</strong> biological and chemical<br />

quality of surface water and ground waters. It included consideration of safeguarding, use<br />

management and <strong>the</strong> management of flood risk.<br />

16.50 The South East <strong>the</strong> per capita consumption of water with data taken in 2008/9 showing an<br />

average usage of 156 litres per person per day (pppd). There are 31km of waterways within<br />

Runnymede with <strong>the</strong> water quality of <strong>the</strong> borough’s rivers generally good. The Thames region<br />

also records 100% compliance with EC Bathing Waters Directive (2009 data).<br />

16.51 In contrast it is noted that in February 2012; 21,603 residential and commercial properties<br />

within <strong>the</strong> borough were at risk of flooding.<br />

16.52 Current indicator data suggests (see: Table 53) that <strong>the</strong> condition of this environmental<br />

receptor overall is unfavourable. The data suggests particular concern regarding <strong>the</strong> SO01<br />

Page | 208 Runnymede BC FINAL <strong>Sustainability</strong> <strong>Appraisal</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – Feb 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!