28.10.2014 Views

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 16.<br />

Introduction<br />

Conclusions<br />

16.1 As required by legislation, this SAR presents how <strong>the</strong> SEA assessment (see Appendix 4) and<br />

<strong>the</strong> SA appraisals (see Appendix 3) has been applied and carried out <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> production of<br />

Runnymede Borough Councils <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. It documents this process that commenced<br />

production in 2004. Both SA and SEA has been carried by in‐house by <strong>the</strong> Council’s impact<br />

assessment, policy and environmental health teams. This cross departmental working<br />

arrangement has provided <strong>the</strong> means of embedding <strong>the</strong> considerations of environmental,<br />

social, and economic impacts on a number of receptors and objectives as a result of<br />

implementing its plan into <strong>the</strong> Council. By doing so <strong>the</strong> Council has met <strong>the</strong> primary objective<br />

of both sustainable development practice and Article 1 of <strong>the</strong> SEA Directive with states that;<br />

“The objective of this Directive [SEA Directive] is to provide <strong>for</strong> a<br />

high level of protection of <strong>the</strong> environment and to contribute to <strong>the</strong><br />

integration of environmental considerations into <strong>the</strong> preparation<br />

and adoption of plans and programmes with a view to promoting<br />

sustainable development… (Emphasis added)’<br />

16.2 The process has nei<strong>the</strong>r been straight<strong>for</strong>ward, nor simple and <strong>the</strong> main issue related to <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that both plan and assessment/appraisal practice emerged around <strong>the</strong> same time ‐ 2004.<br />

The process was fur<strong>the</strong>r complicated due to an extremely long timeframe involved in <strong>the</strong><br />

production of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2004 ‐ 2013; <strong>the</strong> inevitable lack of clarity inherent within<br />

emerging preliminary drafts policies, coupled with a general lack of quantitative data to carry<br />

out <strong>the</strong> assessments resulted in a largely qualitative approach being employed. Issues around<br />

data and plan uncertainty and <strong>the</strong> risks associated are discussed in more detail in Sections 17<br />

and 18 below.<br />

16.3 The overall conclusions of both <strong>the</strong> SEA and SA of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> are now considered in <strong>the</strong><br />

remainder of this section.<br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Policy Context Conclusion<br />

16.4 Preliminary analysis of <strong>the</strong> strategic fit <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> has with <strong>the</strong> wider context of<br />

sustainable development policy (Table 13) indicates that <strong>the</strong> proposed plan had <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

to contribute to a wide range of strategic goals and objectives. A more detailed analysis was<br />

carried out within each of <strong>the</strong> 10 environmental receptors and showed that in general, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> implicitly ra<strong>the</strong>r than explicitly addresses relevant sustainability objectives. This is<br />

considered normal <strong>for</strong> such a plan at this level.<br />

16.5 It is also worth noting that <strong>the</strong>re are likely to be significant differences between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong>’s potential contributions to objectives and its actual contributions to <strong>the</strong> realisation of<br />

broader sustainability policy goals. The <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>’s actual contribution will be subject to <strong>the</strong><br />

influences of a range of factors outside both <strong>the</strong> Council’s and <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>’s control, including<br />

constantly evolving legislative and market conditions, partnership working and local<br />

governance and resource availability.<br />

SA <strong>Sustainability</strong> Objectives Conclusion<br />

16.6 The <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> was subjected to a total of a 1,025 individual appraisals in respect of its SA.<br />

The output of <strong>the</strong>se assessments are summarised in Appendix 3. Overall, and mindful of <strong>the</strong><br />

caveat outlined in paragraph 16.9 and 16.10 below, <strong>the</strong> accepted <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> policies are<br />

considered to be slightly more beneficial than adverse. This conclusion implies that<br />

implementation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> would nei<strong>the</strong>r ‘trail blaze’ <strong>the</strong> achievement of <strong>the</strong><br />

sustainable development objectives as set out in Table 5, nor significantly adversely affect <strong>the</strong><br />

environmental receptors considered by <strong>the</strong> SEA.<br />

16.7 The slight difference in <strong>the</strong> overall conclusions of <strong>the</strong> SEA (neutral) and SA (beneficial) <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

accepted policies is considered to be as a result of <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> SA includes wider<br />

consideration of social and economic objectives, were as <strong>the</strong> SEA largely considers<br />

environmental receptors (see Figure 4).<br />

Page | 203 Runnymede BC FINAL <strong>Sustainability</strong> <strong>Appraisal</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – Feb 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!