28.10.2014 Views

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16.63 Current indicator data suggests (see: Table 60 ) that <strong>the</strong> condition of this environmental<br />

receptor is overall unfavourable. A number of its sustainable development objectives are<br />

considered to be in a severely unfavourable condition, such as SO16 – Air quality<br />

improvement; SO17 – Addressing <strong>the</strong> causes of climate change. This condition assessment<br />

has also transferred to its SEA Factor status. It is accepted that protecting <strong>the</strong> quality of air in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Borough is exceptionally difficult due to <strong>the</strong> cumulative nature and geographic range of<br />

<strong>the</strong> stressor.<br />

16.64 The main background air quality in Runnymede is generally considered to be good; however,<br />

Runnymede has declared 2 Air Quality Management Areas (AQMA) as a result of poor air<br />

quality). One AQMA runs along <strong>the</strong> entire length of <strong>the</strong> M25 (north and south of junction 11)<br />

and <strong>the</strong> second is located in Addlestone town centre (see: Section 9 – ER05 Air Quality above<br />

and Appendix 14). The main air pollutants of concern are nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and<br />

particulate matter (PM 10 ) and potentially (PM 2.5 ). Particulate matter concentrations are<br />

assumed to follow <strong>the</strong> national decreasing trends, however nitrogen dioxide concentrations<br />

can be of concern close at busy roads and in town centres.<br />

16.65 Results from <strong>the</strong> roadside nitrogen dioxide diffusion tube network indicate that exceedences<br />

of <strong>the</strong> annual mean objective has occurred at several sites. The most likely causes are <strong>the</strong><br />

cumulative increases in emissions from traffic and energy use from residential and<br />

commercial developments which <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is proposing to increase. To counter likely<br />

cumulative effects <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> could have included policies that result in <strong>the</strong> management<br />

of traffic that will actually minimise demand so that <strong>the</strong> number of vehicles on <strong>the</strong> local road<br />

network. A positive reduction to ease congestion will in turn improve local air quality. The<br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> does not contain a specific policy on Air Quality.<br />

16.66 Road traffic vehicle emissions accounts <strong>for</strong> a high proportion of air pollution in <strong>the</strong> Borough.<br />

High levels of car ownership and use within and around Runnymede are <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e generally<br />

associated with poor air quality. Runnymede has high levels of car ownership with<br />

approximately 1.5 cars per household – based on <strong>the</strong> 2001 Census 75 , which equated to<br />

approximately 45,616 cars/vans in <strong>the</strong> borough. Between 2001 and 2011 this figure has<br />

increased by approximately 4% to 47,403 cars/vans 76 . Given <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

essentially promotes development that can only add to <strong>the</strong> overall Runnymede car and van<br />

fleet, it is unsurprising that a number of its policies and alternatives are identified as having<br />

potentially adverse effects on receptor ER05.<br />

16.67 The impact <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> could have in terms of air quality on two European sites – Thames<br />

Basin Heaths SPA and Thursley, Ash, Pirbright and Chobham SAC was also considered through<br />

a Level 6 HRA assessment. The Council’s HRA considered three particular <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> policies –<br />

LP01, LP02 and LP08 and <strong>the</strong>ir ability to adversely affect <strong>the</strong> integrity of <strong>the</strong> European sites<br />

due to contributions to poor air quality. Based on <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation available to it and against<br />

<strong>the</strong> advice of Natural England, <strong>the</strong> Council was able to ascertain that implementation of<br />

policies LP01, LP02 and LP03 would not alone or in combination with o<strong>the</strong>r plans or projects<br />

adversely affect <strong>the</strong> integrity of ei<strong>the</strong>r European site.<br />

16.68 Policy LP01 and its two alternatives are considered will result in significantly adverse effects<br />

on this receptor as all options will result in increased contributions of traffic volume and<br />

increased energy use from buildings and infrastructure once operational. These adverse<br />

effects are less when policy LP01 and its alternatives are considered in terms of <strong>the</strong> Level 3<br />

SA.<br />

16.69 Policy LP02 and its six alternatives, exhibit some similarity of effects overall where <strong>the</strong><br />

alternatives would result in increased volumes of traffic and energy use. Similar to policy LP01<br />

adverse effects are less when <strong>the</strong> policy and its alternatives are considered in terms of <strong>the</strong><br />

Level 3 SA.<br />

75 2001 Census – Key Statistics (Cars or Vans)<br />

76 2011 Census Data (Source: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011‐census/key‐statistics‐<strong>for</strong>‐local‐authorities‐inengland‐and‐wales/rft‐table‐ks404ew.xls)<br />

Accessed 29/01/2013.<br />

Page | 210 Runnymede BC FINAL <strong>Sustainability</strong> <strong>Appraisal</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – Feb 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!