28.10.2014 Views

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

effects on <strong>the</strong> environment of certain plans and programmes and <strong>the</strong> findings taken into account in <strong>the</strong><br />

decision making process. Under <strong>the</strong> European Communities Act 1972 (7) , <strong>the</strong> requirements of <strong>the</strong> SEA<br />

Directive are transposed into UK law in England in 2004 by virtue of <strong>the</strong> Environmental Assessment of<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>s and Programmes Regulation 2004 (SEA Regulations) ( 8) .<br />

2.7 Where an SEA is required under <strong>the</strong> Regulations, <strong>the</strong> authority responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> production of <strong>the</strong><br />

plan must follow a specified procedure during its preparation. A major deliverable of this procedure is<br />

<strong>the</strong> production of <strong>the</strong> ER. The ER must be prepared which examines likely significant effects of <strong>the</strong><br />

proposed plan, programme or strategy, including reasonable alternatives, as well as <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

listed in Schedule 2 to <strong>the</strong> Regulations and Annex I of <strong>the</strong> SEA Directive.<br />

2.8 SEA is not defined in law, however, <strong>the</strong> full requirements of an environmental assessment under <strong>the</strong><br />

SEA Directive are summarised in Box 1 below. The SEA process is frequently quoted as being:<br />

‘<strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal, systematic and comprehensive process of evaluating <strong>the</strong> effects<br />

of a proposed policy, plan or programme or its alternatives, including <strong>the</strong><br />

written report on <strong>the</strong> findings of that evaluation, and using <strong>the</strong> findings in<br />

publicly accountable decision making’.<br />

2.9 In order to avoid duplication of ef<strong>for</strong>t between <strong>the</strong> various assessment processes ( 9) work carried out in<br />

completing this SA <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> will not be replicated in subsequent RBC LDF DPDs or SPDs.<br />

2.10 The Council’s <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> and its accompanying SA <strong>Report</strong> incorporate <strong>the</strong> SEA ER. As required by <strong>the</strong><br />

regulations, <strong>the</strong> SA <strong>Report</strong> is being made available in two <strong>for</strong>mats ‐ a full report which includes<br />

technical appraisal and assessment detail, and a non‐technical summary (NTS). Both consider <strong>the</strong><br />

following:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

A description of <strong>the</strong> plan and analysis of its relationship with o<strong>the</strong>r relevant plans and<br />

programmes, and an outline of <strong>the</strong> alternatives to <strong>the</strong> proposed plan that will be subjected to<br />

an assessment in parallel to <strong>the</strong> plan to enable <strong>the</strong> comparative analysis of its impact on <strong>the</strong><br />

environment;<br />

A description of <strong>the</strong> current state of <strong>the</strong> environment in <strong>the</strong> area covered by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>,<br />

including aspects that are likely to be significantly affected and any relevant existing<br />

environmental problems, and an analysis of its likely future condition in <strong>the</strong> absence of <strong>the</strong><br />

proposed plan.<br />

Description and assessment of <strong>the</strong> likely significant effects of <strong>the</strong> proposed plan on <strong>the</strong><br />

following SEA Directive Factors. For <strong>the</strong> purposes of this assessment, <strong>the</strong> factors have been<br />

modified to facilitate a source‐pathway‐receptor method of assessment. The resulting<br />

modification is outlined in Table 1 – SEA Factors.<br />

The effects of <strong>the</strong> plan will be described and assessed in terms of <strong>the</strong>ir duration (short,<br />

medium or long term, and permanent or temporary), <strong>the</strong>ir consequence (beneficial or<br />

adverse), <strong>the</strong>ir status (direct, indirect or induced) and <strong>the</strong>ir capacity to contribute to<br />

cumulative and synergistic impacts. Summaries of <strong>the</strong>se assessments are presented in table<br />

<strong>for</strong>m.<br />

Description of measures that could be taken to prevent, minimise or compensate <strong>for</strong> any<br />

significant adverse effects that <strong>the</strong> proposed plan is expected to have on <strong>the</strong> environment,<br />

and of <strong>the</strong> steps that should be taken to monitor and report on <strong>the</strong> actual environmental<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>the</strong> plan when it is implemented.<br />

7 The European Communities Act 1972 (c. 68)<br />

8 The Environmental Assessment of <strong>Plan</strong>s and Programmes Regulations 2004, Statutory Instrument 2004 No. 1633, HM Government,<br />

London.<br />

9 Article 4(3) of <strong>the</strong> SEA Directive makes explicit reference to avoiding duplication of assessment where a plan or programme <strong>for</strong>ms part of a<br />

hierarchy as is <strong>the</strong> case with <strong>the</strong> RBC SCS and its CS DPD.<br />

Page | 23 Runnymede BC FINAL <strong>Sustainability</strong> <strong>Appraisal</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – Feb 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!