28.10.2014 Views

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report for the Emerging Local Plan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.73 To summarise, Policy SP03 promotes <strong>the</strong> safeguarding of existing sites. It suggests additional provision<br />

between <strong>the</strong> years 2016 – 2026 be considered in a future DPD. This is in line with <strong>the</strong> requirements of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Government’s PPTS. SP03 –A1 does not provide any additional provision.<br />

Strategic Policy 4 (SP04) – Provision and Retention of Infrastructure and Services<br />

4.74 The provision and retention of infrastructure in <strong>the</strong> Borough will be key in delivering <strong>the</strong> development<br />

requirements set out in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Core Strategy and meeting <strong>the</strong> essential infrastructure<br />

requirement in <strong>the</strong> Infrastructure Delivery <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

4.75 The NPPF highlights that <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>s should be positively prepared, and based on a strategy that seeks<br />

to meet objectively assessed development and infrastructure requirements, and <strong>the</strong> Sustainable<br />

Community Strategy (SCS) supports <strong>the</strong> approach of <strong>the</strong> NPPF.<br />

4.76 As <strong>the</strong> Borough will inevitably see an increase in development over <strong>the</strong> plan period, <strong>the</strong> Council<br />

requires all new development required to mitigate <strong>the</strong>ir impacts will be required to contribute towards<br />

<strong>the</strong> delivery of social, physical and green infrastructure needed to support new development. A <strong>Local</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong> policy is deemed necessary to support a new charging schedule under The Community<br />

Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 and The Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment)<br />

Regulations 2011.<br />

4.77 The <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> considered one policy option <strong>for</strong> Policy SP04 to deliver its objective and this has been<br />

summarised in Table 26.<br />

Table 26 – SP04 Policy Options Considered<br />

Policy and Alternatives Considered<br />

Assessment<br />

ID.<br />

Policy/Alternative Policy Text CFR Comment<br />

Strategic Policy 4 (SP04) – Provision and Retention of Infrastructure and Services<br />

Policy SP04 requires new development to contribute to <strong>the</strong> delivery of infrastructure identified in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Infrastructure Delivery <strong>Plan</strong> whilst promoting partnership working secure <strong>the</strong> same.<br />

‐ Alternatives not considered relevant to this policy.<br />

4.78 The <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> promotes no alternatives to Policy SP04, stating that:<br />

“The policy provides a local perspective on <strong>the</strong> guidance set out in The NPPF<br />

which says in paragraph 179 that it is important that planned infrastructure<br />

is delivered in a timely fashion. It is important <strong>for</strong> local planning authorities to<br />

understand <strong>the</strong> borough wide development costs at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> are<br />

drawn up. For this reason infrastructure and development policies should be<br />

planned at <strong>the</strong> same time, in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. In paragraph 175 it says that<br />

where practical, Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) should be worked up<br />

and tested alongside <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. This is <strong>the</strong> proposed approach of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. Policy SP04 seeks to set <strong>the</strong> context <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Infrastructure Delivery<br />

<strong>Plan</strong> (IDP) that underpins <strong>the</strong> CIL charging regime with <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer being an<br />

integral part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> process. It is recognised that <strong>the</strong> development<br />

policies in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> will identify <strong>the</strong> quantum of development and<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> guidance <strong>for</strong> assembling <strong>the</strong> IDP.”<br />

4.79 As no alternative was put <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong> Provision and Retention of Infrastructure and Services policy,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> only policy made available <strong>for</strong> consideration to SA/SEA is SP04. The policy requires <strong>the</strong><br />

Council to work with its partners to secure appropriate contributions and provision of infrastructure<br />

and mitigation to support new development, secure <strong>the</strong> retention of existing infrastructure that meets<br />

local needs.<br />

4.80 At <strong>the</strong> Issues and Options stage considerable support was received <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposal that development<br />

should help fund infrastructure and services, <strong>for</strong> example <strong>the</strong> Council’s Yellow Bus Scheme (transport<br />

<strong>for</strong> school children), general bus services and traffic management measures.<br />

4.81 During <strong>the</strong> evolution of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Council considered <strong>the</strong> alternative to a policy on community<br />

infrastructure would be to rely on guidance as set out in Circular 05/05 and <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> Community<br />

Infrastructure Levy (CIL) when it is introduced. It concluded that this would leave <strong>the</strong> provision of<br />

infrastructure to be dealt with on a case by case basis through <strong>the</strong> planning application process. The<br />

Page | 59 Runnymede BC FINAL <strong>Sustainability</strong> <strong>Appraisal</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – Feb 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!