04.11.2014 Views

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBILISI ... - LED

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBILISI ... - LED

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBILISI ... - LED

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Identification of competitive advantages of Tbilisi economy<br />

3.1. Identification of city products<br />

The first part of the assessment includes a list of products, services and goods<br />

offered by companies and institutions in Tbilisi. In order to estimate their attractiveness the<br />

following criteria have been chosen that are the most significant in the present situation of<br />

Tbilisi:<br />

• Market growth potential<br />

• Product growth potential<br />

• Job creation potential<br />

• Tbilisi specific advantages.<br />

While selecting these criteria we mainly focused on:<br />

Market growth potential: The likeliness of the market to grow has the impact on future<br />

opportunities for product development, geographical expansion and securing sufficient<br />

income to make the industry self-sustainable. Investments in rising markets are promising in<br />

terms of future growth of employment rates and of the number of developing companies<br />

cooperating with the industry.<br />

Product growth potential: Growth potential is one of the most critical factors in product<br />

analysis since high-growth industries tend to yield higher profits, more workplaces and higher<br />

wages. This is why it should be carefully analyzed, taking into particular consideration its<br />

future perspectives, crucial resources and international market assessment.<br />

Job creation potential: Market’s capability of creating high levels of employment in<br />

short to medium term.<br />

Tbilisi specific advantages: Tbilisi’s competitive advantages allowing the product<br />

market to develop and contribute back to the city’s growth.<br />

Over twenty products were evaluated. The final opinion was based on the number of<br />

points assigned to an individual product. The products that were least attractive according to<br />

a given criterion received zero points, medium attractiveness was rewarded with one point<br />

and the high one – with two points.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!