NTRAC Final Study - Nebraska Department of Roads - State of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX A – RIDERSHIP COMPARISONS as high as 55 percent 1 . The higher rail shares are for longer trips, and in general for trips to San Francisco, where high parking costs contribute to a high level of transit use for daily work trips. The results of the Caltrain analysis are shown below. Table A-2: Caltrain Current Rail Share of Morning Work Trips Station Pair Trains MTC AM Peak HBW Trips Caltrain Avg. Weekday Trips Rail Share Miles Burlingame-San Francisco 7 1,941 150.6 0.078 16.3 Redwood City-San Francisco 8 1,118 178.4 0.160 25.4 Palo Alto-San Francisco 11 447 95.9 0.214 30.1 Mountain View-San Francisco 11 359 197.9 0.551 36.1 Santa Clara-Palo Alto 12 2,141 62.4 0.029 14.6 Burlingame-Palo Alto 4 5,420 29.9 0.006 13.8 San Carlos-Mountain View 7 710 41.8 0.059 12.9 Hillsdale-San Jose 5 680 18.7 0.028 27.2 Palo Alto-San Jose 6 3,532 24.6 0.007 17.4 Totals 16,348 800.2 0.049 , (This space intentionally left blank. See next page for Table AC.) 1 The unusually high 55.1 percent rate for Mountain View-San Francisco may reflect greater availability of parking, which attracts more riders to Mountain View than normally would be anticipated based on home and work locations. 384180 NEBRASKA TRANSIT CORRIDORS STUDY Page A- 2 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX A – RIDERSHIP COMPARISONS Table A-3: Southeast High Speed Rail Study Estimate of Modal Demand Major Market Annual Person Trips Auto Air Rail Bus Total % Rail % Bus Washington, DC-VA-MD Richmond-Petersburg, VA 21,440,500 5,500 106,000 7,100 21,559,100 0.49% 0.03% Washington, DC-VA-MD Newport News-Norfolk-VaBch, VA 7,884,300 27,400 52,200 500 7,964,400 0.66% 0.01% Washington, DC-VA-MD Raleigh-Durham, NC 562,500 141,900 27,300 1,000 732,700 3.73% 0.14% Washington, DC-VA-MD Greensboro NC 409,200 56,100 8,400 600 474,300 1.77% 0.13% Washington, DC-VA-MD Charlotte, NC 152,300 105,100 7,900 700 266,000 2.97% 0.26% Washington, DC-VA-MD Greenville-Spartanburg, SC 52,200 37,700 5,600 300 95,800 5.85% 0.31% Washington, DC-VA-MD Atlanta, GA 119,700 512,200 17,400 700 650,000 2.68% 0.11% Washington, DC-VA-MD Columbia, SC 32,700 48,300 6,500 100 87,600 7.42% 0.11% Washington, DC-VA-MD Charleston, SC 61,700 103,300 7,100 - 172,100 4.13% - Washington, DC-VA-MD Savannah, GA 27,800 25,900 4,600 - 58,300 7.89% - Washington, DC-VA-MD Jacksonville, FL 14,900 81,000 1,300 - 97,200 1.34% - Richmond-Petersburg, VA Newport News-Norfolk-VaBch, VA 11,623,300 600 8,000 4,600 11,636,500 0.07% 0.04% Richmond-Petersburg, VA Raleigh-Durham, NC 488,000 8,200 2,500 400 499,100 0.50% 0.08% Richmond-Petersburg, VA Greensboro NC 251,500 12,400 1,100 400 265,400 0.41% 0.15% Richmond-Petersburg, VA Charlotte, NC 164,900 34,100 1,600 200 200,800 0.80% 0.10% Richmond-Petersburg, VA Greenville-Spartanburg, SC 40,400 12,100 - - 52,500 - - Richmond-Petersburg, VA Atlanta, GA 93,100 145,200 - 200 238,500 - 0.08% Richmond-Petersburg, VA Columbia, SC 33,600 7,800 1,100 - 42,500 2.59% - Richmond-Petersburg, VA Charleston, SC 26,800 13,300 2,400 - 42,500 5.65% - Richmond-Petersburg, VA Savannah, GA 15,400 - 200 - 15,600 1.28% - Richmond-Petersburg, VA Jacksonville, FL 19,600 22,700 1,100 - 43,400 2.53% - Raleigh-Durham, NC Greensboro NC 2,458,800 3,100 11,800 - 2,473,700 0.48% - Raleigh-Durham, NC Charlotte, NC 1,424,600 35,000 14,500 700 1,474,800 0.98% 0.05% Raleigh-Durham, NC Greenville-Spartanburg, SC 186,100 - - - 186,100 - - Raleigh-Durham, NC Atlanta, GA 158,300 205,500 - 100 363,900 - 0.03% Raleigh-Durham, NC Columbia, SC 39,800 2,900 800 - 43,500 1.84% - Raleigh-Durham, NC Savannah, GA 28,800 7,500 400 - 36,700 1.09% - Raleigh-Durham, NC Jacksonville, FL 5,600 21,800 600 - 28,000 2.14% - Greensboro NC Charlotte, NC 5,029,300 8,000 3,400 1,700 5,042,400 0.07% 0.03% Greensboro NC Greenville-Spartanburg, SC 304,400 9,200 300 - 313,900 0.10% - Greensboro NC Atlanta, GA 246,000 199,900 1,800 500 448,200 0.40% 0.11% Charlotte, NC Greenville-Spartanburg, SC 2,220,300 6,100 200 600 2,227,200 0.01% 0.03% Charlotte, NC Atlanta, GA 538,800 166,800 1,900 1,400 708,900 0.27% 0.20% Charlotte, NC Columbia, SC 3,353,100 7,500 - 1,000 3,361,600 - 0.03% Charlotte, NC Jacksonville, FL 45,900 40,600 - 200 86,700 - 0.23% Greenville-Spartanburg, SC Atlanta, GA 1,871,600 17,000 1,700 1,500 1,891,800 0.09% 0.08% Augusta, GA-SC Atlanta, GA 1,826,700 11,200 - - 1,837,900 - - Columbia, SC Atlanta, GA 561,400 38,700 - - 600,100 - - Columbia, SC Augusta, GA-SC 2,367,500 - - - 2,367,500 - - Columbia, SC Savannah, GA 80,000 - 200 - 80,200 0.25% - Columbia, SC Jacksonville, FL 69,300 3,000 500 100 72,900 0.69% 0.14% Charleston, SC Savannah, GA 152,700 400 2,000 - 155,100 1.29% - Charleston, SC Jacksonville, FL 94,500 15,400 1,000 - 110,900 0.90% - Savannah, GA Jacksonville, FL 396,500 100 700 500 397,800 0.18% 0.13% Total 66,974,400 2,200,500 304,100 25,100 69,504,100 AVE 1.81% 0.11% MEDIUM 0.98% 0.10% Source: "Southeast High Speed Rail Market & Demand Study," Final Report, August 1997. Authors: KPMG, et al. Exhibit 2-6, "Existing Person Trips by Mode Spring 1995 Surveys and other Data." 384180 NEBRASKA TRANSIT CORRIDORS STUDY Page A- 3 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
Page 3:
Nebraska Transit Corridors Study Co
Page 6 and 7:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY between 141,000 a
Page 9 and 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary
Page 11 and 12:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 8 Financi
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 STUDY PURPOSE AND METHODO
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION Table 1-1
Page 17:
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION services,
Page 21:
North Platte Lexington Kearney Gran
Page 25:
NEBRASKA CORRIDORS STUDY Figure 2-2
Page 29:
Page 32 and 33:
EXISTING CONDITIONS TRAVEL PATTERNS
Page 34 and 35:
EXISTING CONDITIONS Table 2-3: Summ
Page 36 and 37:
EXISTING CONDITIONS changing lanes,
Page 39:
Page 42 and 43:
EXISTING CONDITIONS expressway. Als
Page 44 and 45:
EXISTING CONDITIONS CORRIDOR RAIL L
Page 46 and 47:
EXISTING CONDITIONS airports, which
Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 3 RIDERSHIP POTENTIAL INTRO
Page 51 and 52:
CHAPTER 3 - RIDERSHIP POTENTIAL the
Page 53 and 54:
CHAPTER 3 - RIDERSHIP POTENTIAL Gre
Page 55 and 56:
CHAPTER 3 - RIDERSHIP POTENTIAL Tab
Page 57 and 58:
CHAPTER 3 - RIDERSHIP POTENTIAL 2.
Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 3 - RIDERSHIP POTENTIAL SUM
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 4 TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS INTROD
Page 63 and 64:
CHAPTER 4 - TECHNOLOGY OPITONS Sit
Page 65 and 66:
CHAPTER 4 - TECHNOLOGY OPITONS Sit
Page 67 and 68:
CHAPTER 4 - TECHNOLOGY OPITONS subu
Page 69 and 70:
CHAPTER 4 - TECHNOLOGY OPITONS Tabl
Page 71 and 72:
CHAPTER 4 - TECHNOLOGY OPITONS Trai
Page 73:
CHAPTER 4 - TECHNOLOGY OPITONS FIND
Page 76 and 77:
CHAPTER 5 - COMMUTER RAIL PLAN MINI
Page 78 and 79:
CHAPTER 5 - COMMUTER RAIL PLAN for
Page 80 and 81:
CHAPTER 5 - COMMUTER RAIL PLAN REVE
Page 82 and 83:
CHAPTER 5 - COMMUTER RAIL PLAN long
Page 84 and 85:
CHAPTER 5 - COMMUTER RAIL PLAN The
Page 86 and 87:
CHAPTER 5 - COMMUTER RAIL PLAN stri
Page 88 and 89:
CHAPTER 5 - COMMUTER RAIL PLAN OPER
Page 90 and 91:
CHAPTER 5 - COMMUTER RAIL PLAN Stre
Page 93: Chapter 6 EXPRESS BUS PLANS INTRODU
Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 6 - EXPRESS BUS PLANS Expre
Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER 6 - EXPRESS BUS PLANS Table
Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 6 - EXPRESS BUS PLANS Five
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 7 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL
Page 109 and 110: CHAPTER 7 - ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIA
Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 7 - ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIA
Page 113 and 114: Chapter 8 FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC AN
Page 115 and 116: CHAPTER 8 - FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC
Page 137 and 138: Chapter 9 NEXT STEPS TOWARD IMPLEME
Page 139 and 140: CHAPTER 9 - NEXT STEPS TOWARD IMPLE
Page 141: APPENDICES
Page 147: Appendix B COMMUTER RAIL COSTS Appe
Page 150 and 151: Coffee and water per month 100 Annu
Page 152 and 153: Advertising per month 4,000 Telecom
Page 154 and 155: Table B-2b Omaha Suburban Station E
Page 156 and 157: Table B-2d Lincoln at N. 48th St. S
Page 158 and 159: Table B-3a Lincoln Maintenance Faci
Page 160 and 161: Table B-4a Melia Siding Description
Page 162 and 163: Table B-4c Chalco Siding Descriptio
Page 165 and 166: Table C-1 Fremont Park-and-Ride Cos
Page 167: Appendix D NTRAC MEMBERS The follow
show all

NTRAC Final Study - Nebraska Department of Roads - State of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?