NTRAC Final Study - Nebraska Department of Roads - State of ...
NTRAC Final Study - Nebraska Department of Roads - State of ...
NTRAC Final Study - Nebraska Department of Roads - State of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 5 – COMMUTER RAIL PLAN<br />
OPERATING AGREEMENTS<br />
The commuter rail service will need at least two agreements with the BNSF. One is an access<br />
agreement, whereby BNSF allows the commuter trains to run on its line for a fee. The other is<br />
an operating agreement, which specifies the terms and conditions under which the trains will<br />
operate on the BNSF. BNSF currently hosts commuter rail operations, and the agreements<br />
signed with the commute rail operators can serve as models for commuter rail service on BNSF<br />
in <strong>Nebraska</strong>.<br />
Access Agreement<br />
This analysis has assumed an access agreement along the lines that Metrolink in Los Angeles has<br />
with BNSF today. That agreement grants Metrolink commuter trains access to the BNSF main<br />
line between San Bernardino and Los Angeles for about $7.67 per train mile, <strong>of</strong> which 66 cents<br />
is for dispatching and $7.01 is for access and maintenance <strong>of</strong> way. The dispatching charge<br />
would likely remain constant, but the access and maintenance fee could be lower, as the Lincoln-<br />
Omaha service would operate far fewer and far lighter trains than Metrolink does (thus, the<br />
incremental cost for maintenance <strong>of</strong> way as compared to Metrolink would be less). This analysis<br />
assumes a combined charge <strong>of</strong> $5 per train mile for access, subject to negotiation with the<br />
railroad.<br />
The Metrolink/BNSF agreement also links increases in commuter trains to the capacity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
line. That is, more trains may trigger capacity improvements that would be the responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />
the commuter agency. This could be a feature <strong>of</strong> the Lincoln-Omaha service as well.<br />
Operating Agreement<br />
Such an agreement specifies at a minimum such things as the hours <strong>of</strong> operations for commuter<br />
trains, dispatching rules, and safety requirements for passenger trains operating on BNSF lines.<br />
There could be various other items also, ranging from training <strong>of</strong> crews to insurance<br />
specifications, depending on the preferences <strong>of</strong> the railroad.<br />
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE<br />
To negotiate these and several other agreements (i.e. for contract operator, fare inspection,<br />
custodial services, etc.) and carry on the running commuter trains, the service will require an<br />
institutional structure. One model is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA), composed <strong>of</strong> the<br />
jurisdictions served by the commuter operation. These could include the Cities <strong>of</strong> Lincoln,<br />
Omaha and Gretna, and Lancaster, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties. <strong>State</strong> agencies may even be<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the JPA. The primary responsibility <strong>of</strong> the JPA will be to sponsor the service – that is,<br />
sharing the costs <strong>of</strong> implementing and maintaining the commuter service. This will involve<br />
applying for any federal or <strong>State</strong> funds for which the service is eligible, raising the local match,<br />
and then securing local funding sources for covering the ongoing operating subsidies. A<br />
common vehicle for the subsidies is a local sales tax. Formation <strong>of</strong> JPAs may not require<br />
enabling legislation.<br />
Other models include Special Districts (e.g. Bay Area Rapid Transit District) and a Regional<br />
Transportation Agency (e.g. RTA in Chicago), which may require special enabling legislation.<br />
384180<br />
NEBRASKA TRANSIT CORRIDORS STUDY<br />
Page 5 - 14<br />
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES