09.11.2014 Views

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142<br />

The linear correlation coefficients show that RegCM3 had<br />

superior performance than CPTEC/COLA to reproduce the<br />

inter-seasonal variability of precipitation (0.84 against 0.64)<br />

and air temperature (0.90 against 0.30) in the NDE area.<br />

This is associated to the correction by RegCM3 of the out of<br />

phase seasonal values of the CPTEC/COLA forecasts<br />

(Figure 2).<br />

(a)<br />

variability of seasonal rainfall similar to the analysis. For<br />

air temperature, RegCM3 seasonal mean also shows high<br />

correction with the analysis (0.89) and after the correction<br />

of it systematic cold bias the efficiency coefficient<br />

approximates of 1. This coefficient sensitize that RegCM3<br />

(CPTEC/COLA) is better (worse) preditor of the mean<br />

seasonal values of air temperature and rainfall than the<br />

mean of observations in the period analysed.<br />

5. Acknowledgments<br />

The present study was supported by CNPq and FAPESP<br />

(Grant #2001/13925-5). We thank the NCEP, CPC/NOAA<br />

and ICTP for providing the data set and model.<br />

Table 1 – Averages of the 27 quarter for the analysis<br />

(CPC or NCEP) and RegCM3 and CPTEC/COLA<br />

forecasts, coefficient of efficiency (E) and linear<br />

correlation (r) for precipitation and air temperature. The<br />

value in parenthesis is the E after bias correction.<br />

| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |<br />

(b)<br />

Precipitation Mean (mm/day) r E<br />

CPC 2.6 - -<br />

RegCM3 2.9 0.84 0.62<br />

CPTEC/COLA 5.2<br />

0.64 -1.86<br />

Air Temperature Mean ( o C)<br />

NCEP 25.4 - -<br />

RegCM3 23.7<br />

0.89 -2.27<br />

(0.80)<br />

CPTEC/COLA 25.2 0.30 -0.05<br />

| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |<br />

Figure 2. Seasonal averages over NDE of precipitation<br />

(a) and air temperature (b).<br />

The efficiency coefficient (E) for RegCM3 is positive (0.62;<br />

Table 1), what indicates that the model is better predictor of<br />

the seasonal rainfall than the average (calculated for all the<br />

27 seasons) of the analysis of the CPC. The systematic<br />

negative bias of air temperature in RegCM3 forecasts<br />

produces a negative E coefficient (Table 2). However, if this<br />

bias is removed of the time series, the efficient coefficient<br />

(E b ) increases to 0.8 indicating the superior forecast of<br />

RegCM3 over the mean of observations. The CPTEC/COLA<br />

presents negative E values for both precipitation and air<br />

temperature (Table 1) and this is justified by the bias and out<br />

phase seasonal values (Figure 2) found in these forecasts.<br />

Comparatively, the efficiency coefficient indicates that<br />

RegCM3 is better predictor of seasonal rainfall and air<br />

temperature over the NDE than CPTEC/COLA model.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

This study evaluated the seasonal climate forecasts on the<br />

Northeast of Brazil using the RegCM3 nested in the<br />

CPTEC/COLA AGCM. The 27 seasonal forecasts were<br />

compared with analysis of the CPC (precipitation) and<br />

NCEP re-analysis (air temperature). The most important<br />

result is that RegCM3 correct simulates systematic out of<br />

phase mean values of rainfall and air temperature that is<br />

found in the CPTEC/COLA AGCM forecasts. This implied<br />

that RegCM3 was better predictor of mean seasonal rainfall<br />

than the mean of analysis with efficiency coefficient near 1<br />

and temporal correlation of 0.84. This high correlation<br />

indicates that RegCM3 reproduces the inter-season<br />

References<br />

CAVALCANTI, I. F. A; MARENGO, J. A.,<br />

SATYAMURTY, P., et al. Global climatological<br />

features in a simulation using CPTEC/COLA AGCM.<br />

J. of Climate, Boston v.15, p. 2965-2988, 2002.<br />

CHOU, S. C.; Nunes, A. M. B.; Cavalcanti, I. F. A.<br />

Extended range forecasts over South America using<br />

the regional eta model. J. Geophys. Res., v. 105, n. D<br />

8, p. 10147-10160, 2001.<br />

CUADRA, S. V.; da ROCHA, R. P. Sensitivity of<br />

regional climatic simulation over Southeastern South<br />

America to SST specification during austral summer.<br />

International. J. of Climatology. v. 27, p. 793-804,<br />

2007.<br />

GIORGI, F.; MEARNS, O. Introduction to special section:<br />

regional climate modeling revisited. J. Geophys. Res.,<br />

v. 104, p. 6335-6352, 1999.<br />

KALNAY, E., et al 1996: NCEP/NCAR 40-year<br />

Reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437-<br />

471.<br />

MISRA, V. et al.: Dynamic Downscaling of Seasonal<br />

Simulation over South American. J. Climate, Boston,<br />

v. 16, p. 103-117, 2003.<br />

SEN, O. L., WANG, Y.; Wang, B. Impact of Indochina<br />

deforestation on the East-Asian summer monsoon. J.<br />

Climate, Boston. v. 17, p. 1366–1380, 2004a.<br />

MISRA, V. Understanding the predictability of seasonal<br />

precipitation over northeast Brazil. Tellus, v . 58A, p.<br />

307-319, 2006.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!