09.11.2014 Views

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

45<br />

Regional climate model skill to develop small-scale transient eddies<br />

Martin Leduc, René Laprise, Mathieu Moretti-Poisson and Jean-Philippe Morin<br />

Canadian Regional Climate Modelling and Diagnostics (CRCMD) Network - ESCER Centre - Université du Québec à<br />

Montréal, Montréal, Canada, leduc@sca.uqam.ca.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Over the last few years, the perfect-model approach has<br />

been used in several experiments to measure the sensitivity<br />

of the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) to<br />

various parameters characterizing its nesting technique.<br />

Leduc and Laprise (2008, hereafter LL08) recently<br />

conducted a domain-size experiment that highlighted a wellknown<br />

characteristic of RCM: the control of the lateral<br />

boundary conditions (LBC) on the large-scale component of<br />

the solution becomes weaker when using wide domains<br />

(unless spectral nudging at large scales is applied). Another<br />

effect measured after changes in domain size is related to the<br />

small-scale transient activity, not excited by the LBC but<br />

generated within the RCM domain by local forcing and<br />

through non-linear interactions. Evidence has been found<br />

that the generation of such variability can be highly<br />

penalized over a region of interest if located near to the<br />

inflow boundary. This region where small-scale transient<br />

eddies are deficient in intensity has been interpreted as the<br />

characteristic distance of spin-up that the large-scale inflow<br />

must travel to generate small-scale features with sufficient<br />

intensity. Similarly, de Elía (2006) measured the<br />

characteristic spin-up time for the small scales when<br />

developed from initial conditions containing only large-scale<br />

features.<br />

The LL08 experiment has been performed by running the<br />

CRCM for the winter season over midlatitudes. In order to<br />

generalize, we have extended this work to include the<br />

summer season, where the flow is rather turbulent and<br />

subject to strong convective processes. These new results<br />

give a homogenous spatial spin-up overall the domain of<br />

interest since summer circulation shows frequent changes in<br />

the domain ventilation regime.<br />

An additional experiment has been made by reproducing the<br />

winter experiment but including spectral nudging at large<br />

scales (SN). This technique strongly diminishes variations of<br />

the large-scale flow between two simulations using different<br />

domain sizes. It hence facilitates to unambiguously attribute<br />

differences in small-scale transient patterns to the distance<br />

traveled by the large-scale inflow from the lateral<br />

boundaries. In the following, the perfect-model approach is<br />

used to evaluate the skill of an RCM to develop small-scale<br />

features, for both winter and summer and under conditions<br />

of strong SN.<br />

2. Experimental framework<br />

The perfect-model approach consists of integrating an RCM<br />

over a large domain, called the Big-Brother simulation (BB).<br />

Secondly, BB is low-pass filtered to result in a coarsely<br />

detailed dataset, similar to what usually constitutes the LBC<br />

for driving an RCM. This filtered time series is used to drive<br />

the same RCM over a smaller domain, called the Little-<br />

Brother (LB), which is finally compared to the unfiltered<br />

reference (BB) solution.<br />

The BB simulations produced for winter and summer<br />

seasons are labeled BW and BS respectively. These short<br />

“climates” consist of appending four February (winter) and<br />

four July (summer) months by driving the CRCM with<br />

NCEP reanalyses for the years 1990 to 1993. The BB<br />

domain of integration covers 196x196 grid points with a<br />

center located over Québec, Canada. LB simulations for<br />

winter are named L1W, L3W and L4W for domains of<br />

144x144, 96x96 and 72x72 grid points respectively. Also,<br />

the smallest domain (72x72) has been integrated for the<br />

summer season (L4S). Finally, L1W have been repeated<br />

with the use of a strong SN (L1WN). In Tab. 1 are<br />

summarized the labels and characteristics defining the<br />

CRCM simulations analyzed here. A common domain of<br />

38x38 grid points is used for comparing the simulations.<br />

In the following, we focus on the small-scales features of<br />

the flow, which have been extracted by Fourrier filtering<br />

and correspond to the length scales smaller than 1080 km,<br />

including a smooth transition that reaches 2160 km.<br />

Reader is invited to refer to Leduc and Laprise (2008) for<br />

a detailed description of the experimental procedure.<br />

Name Season Domain<br />

size<br />

SN<br />

strength<br />

BW, BS W, S 196 2 no<br />

L1W W 144 2 no<br />

L3W W 96 2 no<br />

L4W, L4S W, S 72 2 no<br />

L1WN W 144 2 yes<br />

Table 1 Characteristics of the simulations where winter<br />

and summer are respectively represented by W and S and<br />

domain sizes are given in grid points.<br />

3. Small-scales features sensitivity to season<br />

The RCM skill to develop small-scale features are<br />

compared for winter and summer experiments. The<br />

transient eddies of the small-scales features are plotted on<br />

Fig. 1 for the 700-hPa relative humidity field. Virtual<br />

reference simulations (BW and BS) are displayed for both<br />

seasons (Fig. 1 a and b) with associated Little-Brother<br />

(Fig. c and d) integrated over a very small domain (L4W<br />

and L4S on Tab. 1). The first noticeable feature of LBs<br />

compared to BBs is that they display important<br />

underestimations of transient activity. Averaged over the<br />

displayed domain, L4W regenerates 46% of the BW<br />

transient variance while for L4S a value of 59% is<br />

obtained. When attention is devoted to the shape of<br />

patterns compared to the BBs, spatial correlation (R*) for<br />

L4W is poor (R* = 50%) compared to L4S which gives a<br />

value of 90%. The winter small-scale transient pattern is<br />

highly distorted due to a strong westerly inflow and<br />

proximity of the western boundary from the domain of<br />

interest. For the summer case, L4S retains the general<br />

features of the BS pattern, as the northern maximum and<br />

the south-north gradient of relative humidity. Better skill<br />

of the summer simulation to preserve BB pattern in both<br />

intensity and spatial correlation in comparison to same<br />

domain size in winter is partly due to the fact that summer<br />

inflow is weaker and often changes in direction over short<br />

periods (few hours). It results in a spatial spin-up that is<br />

homogenously distributed over the domain of interest,<br />

unlike the winter case where spatial spin-up is<br />

concentrated on a specific region. Also, a better ability to<br />

reproduce small-scale transient variability in summer may<br />

be related to stronger convective processes occurring in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!