09.11.2014 Views

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144<br />

An evaluation of surface radiation budget over North America in a suite of<br />

regional climate models<br />

M. Markovic 1 , C. G. Jones 1 , P. Vaillancourt 2 , K. Winger 1 , D. Paquin 3<br />

1 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, UQAM, 550 Sherbrooke West, 19 th floor, West Tower, Montreal H3A 1B9,<br />

Canada, 2 Numerical Forecast Research Branch, Environnment Canada, 3 Consortium Ouranos, Montreal, Canada<br />

e-mail: markovic@sca.uqam.ca<br />

In this study we evaluate the components of the surface<br />

radiation budget (SRB) (downwelling longwave, DLR and<br />

incoming shortwave radiation, ISR) in three regional climate<br />

models (RCMs): CRCM (The Canadian Regional Climate<br />

Model), GEM-LAM (Regional version of Global<br />

Environmental Multiscale Model) and RCA3 (Regional<br />

model of Rossby Centre, Sweden) against surface<br />

observations. All three RCMs use different radiation and<br />

cloud schemes, characterizing systematic errors in the SRB<br />

as a function of climatic conditions will aid in model<br />

improvement.<br />

The RCMs will be directly compared with available surfacebased<br />

measurements (SURFRAD Network) over different<br />

conditions. We will determine the quality of the simulated<br />

radiation budget in the respective models and target the<br />

areas and climatic conditions where the models give the<br />

worst results. By evaluating the surface radiation budget in a<br />

variety of climate conditions, for cloudy and clear conditions<br />

separately and as function of season and time of day, we aim<br />

to isolate conditions and situations where the respective<br />

cloud and radiation schemes operate poorly and identify<br />

aspects of the parameterization schemes that are causing<br />

these simulation errors.<br />

While surface based radiation observations offer accuracy at<br />

high temporal resolution, they do not allow full evaluation<br />

of the simulated SRB and cloud cover across the entire<br />

North America. In order to compare the RCMs over wider<br />

geographical domain we first evaluate ISR, DLR and cloud<br />

cover for various possible observational surrogate datasets:<br />

ERA40 (ECMWF Reanalysis), NARR (North American<br />

Regional Reanalysis, NCEP) and ISCCP (International<br />

Satellite Cloud Climatology Project).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!