09.11.2014 Views

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

71<br />

Investigation of added value at very high resolution with the Regional<br />

Climate Model CCLM<br />

Martin Suklitsch and Andreas Gobiet<br />

Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change and Institute for Geophysics, Astrophysics and Meteorology, Institute of<br />

Physics, University of Graz, Leechgasse 25, 8010 Graz, Austria (martin.suklitsch@uni-graz.at)<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Based on a large ensemble of sensitivity simulations at a<br />

horizontal resolution of 10 km with the Regional Climate<br />

Model CCLM (Will et al., submitted), merits and<br />

shortcomings of this particular RCM have been<br />

demonstrated (Suklitsch et al., 2008). In this study we<br />

additionally deploy finer grids of 3 and 1 km horizontal<br />

resolution for single month simulations in a winter and a<br />

summer case in two test areas within the Alpine Region and<br />

analyze the added value due to finer spatial resolution.<br />

2. Method<br />

In order to reach the very high horizontal resolution of 1km<br />

a triple nesting approach is applied. Starting from ERA-40<br />

(Uppala et al., 2001) lateral boundary data at roughly<br />

120km horizontal grid spacing we first simulate the entire<br />

Greater Alpine region at 10 km (red rectangle in fig. 1), then<br />

the Eastern Alps (east of Innsbruck; green in fig. 1) at 3 km<br />

and finally the two test regions at 1 km (blue): One hilly<br />

region with relatively smooth orography, located in the<br />

southeastern part of Styria, and a mountainous one, with<br />

steep orography located in the “Hohe Tauern” region of the<br />

Alps.<br />

(1) There is a cold bias (area average in hilly region) at<br />

any resolution. The cold bias ranges from −0.9K (July) to<br />

−2.4K (January) at 10 km resolution, from −2.0K (July) to<br />

−2.6K (January) at 3 km resolution, and amount to −1.8K<br />

(July and January) at 1 km resolution. Qualitatively<br />

similar results for one location in the Hohe Tauern region<br />

are shown in figure 3, where the mean diurnal cycle of the<br />

three resolution steps is compared to observation data.<br />

(2) Precipitation (not shown) is overestimated at 10 and<br />

3 km resolution, but underestimated at 1 km resolution.<br />

The latter however strongly depends on the physical<br />

parameterization: in case of the setup where graupel is<br />

included in the microphysics scheme precipitation is<br />

Figure 1. Domains used for this study. Red: 10 km,<br />

green: 3 km and blue: 1 km horizontal resolution.<br />

Dashed lines indicate extended domains, solid lines<br />

the default ones.<br />

3. First results<br />

Figure 2 shows the 2m air temperature at each of the three<br />

resolutions for the Hohe Tauern region. Here it is clearly<br />

visible that the increased resolution yields more realistic<br />

results. The value of the increased resolution will be<br />

quantified using observational data of the Austrian Weather<br />

Service (ZAMG), of the avalanche warning services of<br />

Tyrol, Salzburg and Carinthia, and from the new high<br />

resolution observation network WegenerNet (Kirchengast et<br />

al., 2008).<br />

A preliminary evaluation of the resolution chain (based on<br />

selected examples) shows the following main features:<br />

Figure 2. 2m air temperature for the “Hohe Tauern”<br />

region in July 2007 as forecast by CCLM at 10, 3<br />

and 1 km horizontal resolution (top to bottom).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!